skillerified
Dewar's 18 Year The Vintage
Blended — Scotland
Reviewed
October 11, 2020 (edited July 11, 2021)
N: Cola, sweet and dark red cherries, peach and pear, dried peat (but no smoke), caramel, vanilla, bread pudding with maybe a faint chocolate drizzle. Tried different glasses for this one (above is rocks with one ice cube, my normal preference as I like to see how a dram opens as it both warms and waters). Glencairn reveals some interesting characteristics: bacon and then s'mores - like, fully cooked, right off the campfire, not the component parts. I still don't get actual smoke, just smoked things. Very intriguing. Neat glass is a disappointment - fruit is more pronounced, but nothing is really added.
P: Creamy, smooth and rich. Vanilla creme and/or custard, dark red fruit, hints of chocolate, and (yeah) Graham crackers (there's the s'mores, minus the smoke). Little corner hits of caramel and sea salt. A little woodsy and bitter at the start of the finish, then moves spicy. Spice doesn't seem to have a taste per se, just lingering heat (like capsaicin). The tannins and bitterness stick around, but at acceptable, maybe even pleasant, levels. Over time, there's more chocolate on the finish, but it's less pronounced than on the 15 year. (Also, no real difference on the palate between glass types.)
Bought this thinking intentionally to compare it to the 15 year that I reviewed a few weeks back. Thought that was a great blend for the money and a substantial step up from the 12. This, however, is really more just different from the 15, not inherently better. This is, no doubt, subtler and perhaps more nuanced, particularly in the nose, but the overall experience is probably not worth the extra 10 bucks - unless you really like packaging that feels fancy, but is still cheap plastic and cardboard. This bottle has that in spades - overly large box with a side slide opening and a heavier, more ornate bottle. Tossed the box immediately and have no intention of keeping the bottle.
Begin rant: (Actually, there's a hint of pretension (and waste) in all that that kinda annoys me, now that I think of it. It's all designed to be kept after drinking as some special prize, but it's a widely available $50 blended scotch, man! If you're keeping this for the display case... Never mind. I don't keep any bottles. Pictures of half empties are good enough for me.) End rant.
50.0
USD
per
Bottle
Mission Wine & Spirits
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@skillerified Wow! I'm looking forward to your tasting when you get there and can compare it with the others :)
@skillerified That’s a whisky geek’s whisky; I’m sure you’ll let us know when you’re done :-)
I have the 21 year Double Double sitting on a shelf as well. That's partially why I've gone through the 12, 15, and now 18, to build some background experience for when I get to that bottle. Not in a rush on that one, so might be a little while.
@CKarmios I really like when blends list their constituent distilleries and there's only a few of them because I figure if it has a couple of distilleries I like then the blend has a good shot :) Sometimes they make a big deal that there's some Macallan or such included and I'm like "yeah, right, a teaspoon I'm sure" though.
Thanks for comparing with the 15. I've been thinking of picking up a bottle of Dewar's since I've only ever had the White Label and it's been ages, but I was still on the fence.
I like the fact they list the constituent single malts, all five owned by them, of course