Tastes
-
Dingle Single Malt Batch No. 4
Single Malt — Ireland
Reviewed November 27, 2021 (edited March 3, 2022)Nose - grilled peach, apricot, fig, toffee, vanilla, orange, sultana, milk chocolate, hazelnut, mint, strawberry, sweet floral notes, straw, cinnamon, nutmeg, moderate ethanol burn. Taste - apricot, fig, peach, mint, cherry, butterscotch, sultana, sweet floral notes, cinnamon, ginger, orange, lemon oil, chocolate, ash, chili pepper, spicy oak, pineapple, mango, moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium length with sweet stone fruit, baking spice, strong citrus, and spicy chili pepper flavors. I’ve been interested in trying Dingle for a long time now. It’s a very small distillery, producing only about four casks a day. Some of their past releases were hyped and became close to unattainable. This fourth batch is the first I’ve seen in the stores near here. Unfortunately, it hasn’t gotten the same love some of the older releases did. The nose is very fruit-forward and juicy. Stone fruit, strawberry, sultana, and fig dominate, no doubt due to the sherry and port cask influences. The palate is rather sour and spicy. The fruits are still very much in the mix, but more citrus, pepper, and an interesting ashy note present. This is giving me strong American Single Malt vibes. Specifically, this drinks like a spicier, more sour Balcones Lineage. And I like the Lineage slightly more. The dominant citrus and background ash produce an almost metallic note that dampens an otherwise positive experience. I opened the bottle a few days ago, so maybe some of this will work itself out in the next couple months. I’ll check back in later, but for now this is good but not great. And at $90 a bottle, that’s pretty disappointing. -
Tyrconnell 16 Year Oloroso & Moscatel Cask Finish
Single Malt — Ireland
Reviewed November 26, 2021 (edited April 16, 2022)Nose - underripe banana, sour apple, pineapple, sweet floral notes, honey, mint, tangerine, caramel, vanilla, lemon, cinnamon, cocoa, clove, dry oak, apricot, fig, grape, mild to moderate ethanol burn. Taste - tangerine, lemon, sour apple, sweet floral notes, caramel, vanilla, honey, allspice, clove, mint, ginger, chili pepper, pineapple, underripe banana, leather, cocoa, peach, apricot, moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium length with tangerine, baking spice, chili pepper, and underripe banana flavors. The second and final Tyrconnell I’m tasting is this 16 Year expression finished in Oloroso and Moscatel casks. The nose is sweet, sour, and decadent. It’s not quite as syrupy as the 15 Year I tried yesterday, but there’s tangerine, dried fruit, a strong floral quality, and some nice underripe banana aromas a la Green Spot. The palate is very sour, but not in a totally unpleasant way. More tangerine, pineapple, juicy peach, and some leathery tannins. This is really good, but I find some of the same issues I did with the 15 Year. It’s extremely sweet and probably too sour as well. If I had to choose, I’d pick this one over its counterpart, because it’s less syrupy and cloying, and there’s a bit more oomph here with the leather and green banana notes. And another huge thank you to @ContemplativeFox for the generous sample! I enjoyed my Tyrconnell experiences and will keep them on my radar in the future. These aren’t your average, boring Irish whiskies. -
Tyrconnell 15 Year Madeira Cask Finish
Single Malt — Ireland
Reviewed November 25, 2021 (edited November 22, 2022)Nose - honey, fig, apricot, sultana, peach, grape, white pepper, apple, ginger, butterscotch, vanilla, pecan, cocoa, cereal grain, cinnamon, bitter herbal notes, orange, mild to moderate ethanol burn. Taste - peach, honey, apricot, vanilla, caramel, fig, pecan, lemon, chili pepper, cinnamon, allspice, ginger, sweet floral notes, sour apple, mint, cereal grain, mild to moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium length with honey, sweet stone fruit, and ginger flavors. I have to admit that Tyrconnell is a distillery about which I know close to nothing. When I stuck my nose in the glass, I was expecting another highly grain-forward Irish whisky, but that’s not what you get here. It’s sweet, syrupy stone fruits, floral citrus, and decadent caramelized nuts. The palate is equally desert-like with boozy nuts and fruits, creamy vanilla, and a spicy, gingery zing. In a blind tasting, I’m sure I would have pegged this for a heavily finished Highland single malt. Specifically, this is very reminiscent of my experience with Glenmorangie Nectar D’Or. I think this is slightly better actually, but it’s pretty close in quality for me. Overall this is not my favorite profile, and it veers slightly into sour territory. However, it’s a quality dram and has satisfied my food coma sweet tooth this evening. Happy Thanksgiving, everyone! And a big thank you to @ContemplativeFox for providing the sample! -
Glendalough Double Barrel Single Grain
Single Grain — Ireland
Reviewed November 24, 2021 (edited December 1, 2021)Nose - cereal grain, dusty corn, fig, cashew, bitter herbal notes, caramel, orange zest, vanilla, ethanol, oat, cinnamon, honey, apple, mild to moderate ethanol burn. Taste - cereal grain, honey, vanilla cream, caramel, cinnamon, fig, bitter herbal notes, ethanol, white pepper, corn bread, ginger, apple, cherry, cashew, mild to moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium short with cereal grain, light caramel, and drying herbal flavors. I’m generally not a fan of young Irish whiskies or single grain whiskies, so I don’t have high hopes for this. The nose is very grainy and corny, with some light baking spices, caramel, and a hint of sherried fruit. The palate is equally grainy, with some nice vanilla cream and nutty notes before turning dry and bitter on the finish. This isn’t great, but it’s not terrible either. It’s better than the Proper Twelve I tried yesterday, and it’s probably closer in quality to Jameson and Bushmills Original for me. There are nice, honeyed fruity and nutty aromas and flavors, but the overwhelming, youthful grainy and drying qualities hold this back from receiving anything higher than an average score. Another big thank you to @ContemplativeFox for providing the generous sample! -
Proper No. Twelve Irish Whiskey
Blended — Ireland
Reviewed November 23, 2021 (edited December 1, 2021)Nose - cereal grain, ethanol, lemon, shortbread, green apple, peach, bitter herbal and floral notes, cinnamon, vanilla, mild to moderate ethanol burn. Taste - light caramel, vanilla, cereal grain, cinnamon, ethanol, lemon, apple skin, orange zest, shortbread, bitter herbal notes, dusty corn, mild to moderate alcohol bite, finishing short with shortbread, bitter citrus, and light baking ethanol flavors. Coming off the heels of Blue Spot, I’m ready for a disappointment with this one. And I got one. Well, maybe it’s not a disappointment if I was expecting it, but I digress. The nose is quintessential cheap, young Irish whisky. It’s mild, grainy, slightly citrusy, moderately bitter, and blandly sweet. There’s really not much to say about this one. It’s a worse version of Bushmills Original and Jameson, and probably closer in quality to the Total Wine Busker miniature I tried a while back. It’s not undrinkable, but I wouldn’t actively choose to drink this again. Thank you to @ContemplativeFox for providing the sample! -
Blue Spot 7 Year Cask Strength Single Pot Still
Single Pot Still — Ireland
Reviewed November 22, 2021 (edited July 6, 2022)Nose - cereal grain, shortbread cookie, light toffee, vanilla cream, green apple, orange, yogurt covered raisins, mango, lemon meringue, fig, sweet dough, powdered sugar, caramel corn, cinnamon, dry herbal notes, moderate ethanol burn. Taste - shortbread cookie, caramel, vanilla, lemon oil, grapefruit, ginger, chili pepper, cinnamon, allspice, orange zest, milk chocolate, pineapple skin, green apple, mint, bitter herbal notes, moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium length with shortbread cookie, lemon, and sour tropical fruit flavors. During a recent virtual tasting with @PBMichiganWolverine @pkingmartin and @Richard-ModernDrinking , I had the rare opportunity to taste this elusive Irish whisky. The nose is classic Irish, but cranked to eleven. Buttery shortbread cookie, sherried fruits, lemon, and some sweet tropical fruits. Juicy, effervescent, and sparkling come to mind with the palate. It’s richly citrusy, tropical, buttery, and fruity. This is great Irish whisky. Some of the best I’ve tried. The closest comparison I have is Redbreast 12 Year Cask Strength. I like this slightly more, but it’s in the same category of tastiness for me. It’s absolutely worth the ~$100 retail price, as was the Redbreast, but good luck finding this unicorn. Don’t pay the secondary markup for this. It’s a great example of the category, but it’s not mind-blowingly good. A massive shout-out to @PBMichiganWolverine for sharing this. It’s inspired me to dedicate my next few reviews to knocking out the small backlog of Irish whiskies I’ve accumulated. -
CHÂTEAU DE LAUBADE BAS-ARMAGNAC 1979
Armagnac — Bas-Armagnac, France
Reviewed November 20, 2021 (edited November 26, 2021)Nose - grape must, brown sugar, date, fig, dark chocolate, coffee, raisin, tobacco, molasses, banana, hazelnut, nutmeg, cinnamon, orange, rich oak, lemon, mild to moderate ethanol burn. Taste - tart grape, orange, date, nutmeg, clove, lemon, pineapple, fig, molasses, cocoa, tobacco, leather, raisin, polished oak, walnut, molasses, overripe banana, moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium long with musty raisin, baking spice, dark fruit, and citrus flavors. This is the final Laubade and Armagnac of my review series, and it’s an old one at around 40 years. The age is easily detectable on the nose. Dark fruits, chocolate, nuts, and interestingly some rummy molasses and banana aromas as well. The palate is musty with more of the same notes and a pleasantly lingering finish. I think I like the 1988 the most from the set of five. The 1979 is woodier and a bit more closed off than the other. Nonetheless, this is great Armagnac and a pleasure to experience. And I’ll give one last huge thank you to @ContemplativeFox for providing these for me to review. It’s been a great learning experience to do a deep dive into these progressively older Laubade expressions. -
CHÂTEAU DE LAUBADE BAS-ARMAGNAC 1988
Armagnac — Bas-Armagnac, France
Reviewed November 18, 2021 (edited November 26, 2021)Nose - grape must, toffee, brown sugar, nutmeg, clove, bitter herbal notes, coffee, black cherry, plum, lemon, vanilla, polished oak, fig, mint, anise, dark chocolate, hazelnut, mild to moderate ethanol burn. Taste - tart grape, black cherry, plum, fig, ginger, white pepper, toffee, orange, allspice, nutmeg vanilla, floral notes, mint, anise, walnut, sweet oak, chocolate, brown sugar, mild to moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium length with toffee, musty grape, nut, and chocolate flavors. Day four of my Laubade journey brings me to this 1988 vintage, bottled at the ripe old age of 31 years. Now this is starting to smell more like the really good, old Armagnacs I’ve tried previously. It’s super dark. Dark fruits, dark chocolate, oak, toffee. It’s decadent and highlights that great Armagnacs can easily hold their own against some of the best whiskey noses. As expected, the palate doesn’t quite match the nose, but it’s easily better than its younger counterparts’. And fortunately, the bitterness and sourness are kept in check. This is great Armagnac, further highlighting that 30 years seems to be inflection point between good and great examples of the category, at least to my preferences. There are still flaws here, and as expected I wish this were less diluted, but I’d happily drink it any day. Tomorrow, I’ll wrap up the series with a 40 Year version from the brand. And once again, a big thank you to @ContemplativeFox for the sample! -
CHÂTEAU DE LAUBADE BAS-ARMAGNAC 1995
Armagnac — Bas-Armagnac, France
Reviewed November 17, 2021 (edited November 26, 2021)Nose - grape must, apricot, toffee, vanilla, fig, orange, plum, coffee, ginger, jalapeño, anise, earthy floral notes, almond, mint, clay, brown sugar, nutmeg, clove, milk chocolate, mild to moderate ethanol burn. Taste - tart grape, apricot, pineapple skin, orange, lemon pith, ginger, white pepper, clove, nutmeg, caramel, mint, anise, tannic oak, vanilla, fig, plum, chocolate, mild to moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium length with dark fruit, bitter citrus, spicy pepper, tannic oak flavors. We’re adding three years of age on top of the 1998 vintage I reviewed yesterday, which makes this one around 24 years old. Right off the bat, the nose is richer and more interesting than its younger counterparts’. The grape and dried dark fruit aromas are very present, and there’s something earthy and herbal I can’t quite identify as well. Although not unpleasant, it starts to head in that direction. The palate is darkly fruity with some bitter, peppery citrus and drying oak alongside hints of tropical fruit and baking spices. I like this better than the 1998 and 2000 vintages, but it’s not a revelation. There’s more complexity in both the nose and palate, and the finish is slightly longer and spicier as well. The mouthfeel is still on the watery side, making me wish it weren’t diluted down to 40%. Although flawed, this is good Armagnac and deserves the higher score over the others. Many thanks to @ContemplativeFox for the generous sample! -
Château de Laubade Bas-Armagnac 1998
Armagnac — Bas-Armagnac , France
Reviewed November 16, 2021 (edited November 27, 2021)Nose - grape must, plum, fig, grilled peach, salted caramel, vanilla, brown sugar, coconut, orange, lemon, apple, nutmeg, cinnamon, sweet floral notes, milk chocolate, walnut, mild ethanol burn. Taste - tart grape, apricot, fig, date, lemon, orange zest, pineapple, caramel, vanilla, cinnamon, nutmeg, brown sugar, sour apple, ginger, chili pepper, mint, bitter oak, light sulphur, mild to moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium short with tart grape, dark fruit, and bitter citrus and oak flavors. With the second Chateau de Laubade review, we add two years of age which makes this one around 21 years old. The nose is expectedly richer, with more dark fruits presenting and less bright sourness. The palate isn’t quite as sour as the 2000 vintage’s, but there’s still an unpleasant brightness and bitterness to the experience. And interestingly, a bit of sulphur sneaks into the mix as well. The nose is better than its younger sibling’s, but the palate is about equal for me. The finish is slightly better, and the profile is much fruitier and less citrusy. It still tastes underproofed, but not as obviously as the 2000 did. Also, I’m not sure if it’s actually sulphur I’m tasting or whether I’m interpreting another flavor incorrectly, but I find that it does detract from the overall experience. Another big thank you to @ContemplativeFox for providing the sample!
Results 81-90 of 510 Reviews