ctbeck11
Van Winkle Special Reserve Lot "B" 12 Year
Bourbon — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed
February 14, 2021 (edited February 25, 2021)
Nose - cherry, candied watermelon, tart apple, caramel, clove, allspice, cinnamon, banana bread, plum, ginger, sweet oak, black pepper, nutmeg, brown sugar, cola, almond, honey, leather, tobacco, mild to moderate ethanol burn.
Taste - cherry cola, vanilla, cinnamon, nutmeg, watermelon, clove, black pepper, leather, tobacco, sweet and spicy oak, apple, honey, plum, almond, brown sugar, moderate alcohol bite, finishing medium length with sweet oak, cherry, and baking spice flavors.
After trying the 10 and 15 year Van Winkles, this one was a bit of a letdown. Don’t get me wrong, it was definitely good bourbon. Just not quite as full flavored as its siblings, possibly due to the lower proof at which it’s bottled. Both the nose and the palate are brighter and lighter than the others. The fruit notes are fresh, rather than dark and dried. And the nuttiness that was very present on the 10 and 15 was more subdued. The candied watermelon note is really interesting though. Almost like eating a Sour Patch Kids gummy.
I’m happy to be taking another Van Winkle intermission between vodka tastings. Overall this is good bourbon, but for the money I’d rather have the 10 year old. Obviously it’s not worth the secondary price, but is something I’d recommend paying the price of entry for at a restaurant during a nice dinner out.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
Nice reward after all of your vodka efforts!
@Bourbon_Obsessed_Lexington I’ve never had a cask strength Maker’s Mark, but do have a bottle of Larceny BP. While the profile is much nuttier on the Larceny, I agree that the Van Winkle doesn’t significantly outclass it. I think I slightly prefer the Van Winkle, but probably not enough to rate them differently. And it’s also fairly easy to find at $50, so the value winner is clear.
I recall this being hot and flavorful but no more so than a Larceny BP or even a MM cask strength.