pkingmartin
Springbank 21 Year
Single Malt — Campbeltown, Scotland
Reviewed
January 16, 2022 (edited February 12, 2023)
It’s officially 2022 and I’ve decided to “Spring”bank into it with a series of samples. Continuing on my Springbank series, I have the 21-year from the 2019 release from @ctbeck11 that was matured in 55% ex-Rum casks and 45% ex-Port casks and bottled at 46%.
The nose is deep and rich starting with a mix of well-aged old oak, bold berries, citrus fruits and light farm funk followed by candied pineapple and white chocolate macadamia nut cookies then a mild smoke appears as a smoldering campfire on an oceanside that fades to the background of fruits of sautéed apples, candied orange peel and cherries jubilee that transitions to vintage leather and old polished mahogany with medium ethanol burn.
The taste is a rich mouthfeel starting with a mix of well-aged old oak, bold berries, citrus fruits and light farm funk followed dark chocolate, moderate ash and a mild drying spice that slowly fades to vanilla creme brûlée, fruits of caramelized mango, candied pineapple and cherries jubilee that transitions to vintage leather and old polished mahogany with medium ethanol burn.
The finish is long with white chocolate macadamia nut cookies, charred orange, strawberry jam on toast, dark chocolate, mild ash, vintage leather and polished mahogany.
For the proof, this is a big, bold and thick Springbank that really showcases old wood with a balance of tropical, berry and citrus that doesn’t overpower those traditional Springbank funk, smoke and minerality. The taste veers towards a moderate drying spice that throws off the balance but fades to those rum and port cask fruits before a long finish with baked sweets, dark chocolate, citrus, berries and that old oak.
This was another incredible whisky by Springbank and a huge thank you to @ctbeck11 for being generous enough to provide a sample of this rarity.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@pkingmartin yeah, I think so—-those two are the most bang for buck. Used to be 18 ..:but now that’s too high as well
@PBMichiganWolverine @ctbeck11 It seems that the 12 and 15 are the best value for money. This one was delicious but the Batch 19 of their 12 year was better IMHO.
@ctbeck11 I’m in the same mindset —- I bought one Springbank 21, but I can’t ever justify getting another at this pricing. The older CS versions though are mortgage level high. That’s a one way ticket to a divorce lawyer.
@PBMichiganWolverine I get the high pricing. Maybe this particular batch wasn’t perfection and the others are be closer to it, but I won’t be buying another bottle to find out. If I came across an old single cask, cask strength bottling, I’d think hard on it though.
@ctbeck11 @pkingmartin Springbank can do no wrong. ( well…maybe that price)
Excellent whiskey indeed. And great review. Still, I’d take a random 12 Year over a random 21 Year if they were priced the same. And I could buy 3-4 of them for what I paid for this one.