DrRHCMadden
Loch Lomond 18 Year
Single Malt — Highlands , Scotland
Reviewed
October 13, 2022 (edited January 10, 2023)
I saw a three pack of 50 ml samplers for AUD$30. Thought, why not. Original was two nights ago and an acceptable launch point that set up an unceremonious fall last night with the 12. Now the 18 beckons. And I’m still sad from last night and my burnt palate!
N: off to a poor start with a weak profile. Some feint honey, dusty/musty oak and a little malty cereal. Drying and with a little acetone this is not the best.
P: Still some of the 12s burning inferno but its not nearly as bad, its definitely tempered. Abruptly malty and a little sour. There is a background iodine peat note but without any smokiness. It feels thin and a little watery, which is a shame as they’ve bumped it to 46%.
F: Moderate. The heat kicks about, but if you can be bothered to look there is more slightly sour malt to be found. Ever drunk water from a really old water fountain, probably at the back end of a high school corridor? That metallic coppery taste? Yeah, thats come to the party.
A good hit of water has lifted the nose and there is some welcome sweetness. The palate cools off and there is a pleasant smoke with an increase in body and fullness (thats odd). Water has killed off the finish leaving heat high and far back on the throat.
Ultimately another fail. Better than the 12, sure. Thats easily achieved by most things though, like dirty dishwater, or an oily puddle. I could offer more suggestions but it is making me sad again. For 18 years this is rough, lacks depth, flavour, or a well managed profile. If you need almost as much water in your glass as whisky to make it approachable then somethings very wrong indeed. My own fault I guess, the price of AUD$115 for an 18 year old should of set the alarm bells ringing for the Australian market. Stick with the LL Original at half the price; that at least is interesting (although I still don’t know if I like it).
(Kenyanthrops platyops in picture because thats just how I roll).
Distiller whisky taste #90
115.0
AUD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@hvalbuena it’s an odd one. Some people really seem to like it, I can’t understand why. Hopefully your trust in my comments is not misplaced. Would be good to see your thoughts though, so if you ever see the three pack of tasters it would be good to see your thoughts.
Thanks for this great review! I was considering it but now is off of my shopping cart
@cascode I suspect the community ratings are unnaturally high due to the effect of relative low cost for high age statement whisky combined with people who buy them for the age statement and rate them as of age = brilliance. There are a lot of scores from users who have no notes with them and only one or two tastings on their profile. 12 and 18 are objectively bad. Also, got your box this afternoon- very kind thanks. I’ll aim to get you a selection out tomorrow.
I think you nailed these three Loch Lomonds 👍 I tasted them from the same 3-sample pack a little while ago and came to very similar conclusions. It’s bizarre how the youngest and cheapest expression is the best, and I’m puzzled by the high ratings I see for the 12 and 18, which are blending quality whiskies IMHO - but that’s just my taste.
@PBMichiganWolverine noted at bottom of my review… I decided to go with some hominids for this three part series
What’s that geological specimen in the back?