John-Gargo
Grant's Family Reserve
Blended — Scotland
Reviewed
November 6, 2016 (edited August 25, 2017)
I spotted a handle of this blended scotch in a friend's kitchen and my interest was piqued... after all, I'm a huge fan of two of the component single malts in this blend - Balvenie and Glenfiddich. There's a minor (and amusing) controversy regarding this blend... Jim Murray awarded it a ludicrously high score in his contentious Whisky Bible, and I've read more than a couple of online blogs penned by Single Malt partisans who scoff and call this bottom-shelf swill. As always, the truth is somewhere in between. I sampled Grant's out of a tumbler (no glencairn glass at my friend's apartment, I'm afraid) and I was immediately surprised by the pleasing and aromatic nose that the scotch gives off. On the palate I also got some vanilla notes (perhaps from the Balvenie?) and also some pear and green apple (doubltess from the Glenfiddich). The component grain whiskies do their part to fill in and the finish is pretty decent and slightly sweet (never cloying), without the harsh burn that you often get from blends in this price range. As a point of comparison, this is slightly cheaper (and much better) than Johnnie Walker Red. Its light and unassuming Speyside style also makes it, in my mind, the most versatile of the bottom shelf scotches that I've sampled (Cutty Sark being a more summer drink, and Ballantine's a more winter dram). Grant's I think would be at home in either season.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
Excellent summary - Grant's is certainly not as good as Jim Murray claims, but also not as bad as some whisky connoisseur believe. It's a decent and honest Scotch blend and better than many of its competitors.