Erogers100
Balvenie DoubleWood 17 Year
Single Malt — Speyside, Scotland
Reviewed
January 4, 2017 (edited July 30, 2017)
I'm beginning to think I must just be a bourbon guy, because I cannot justify the price point on some of the single malts I've tried lately. This is another installment in the sample collection I received as a gift this Christmas.
I jotted some notes while tasting and compared them to my review of the Balvenie Doublewood 12-year from a few months back. It definitely has some similarities.
On the nose, I picked up some cherry vanilla ice cream, orange pekoe tea with lemon and a dusting of cinnamon. The palate expressed the grain in a more biscuit like fashion as opposed to the cereal notes I found in the 12. Some spice and dried fruit are there, along with that faint wisp of pipe smoke. The finish is a bit longer, with moderate burn and a slight bitter edge that isn't unpleasant. Dry glass is pipe tobacco.
In all, it is good, but not great. A 750 mL bottle costs US $137.99 locally, more than double the cost of the 12-year Doublewood (at $55.99) and only $2 less than Highland Park 18. For a nice, drinkable dram, the 12 is a much better value in my opinion. Or perhaps I am missing something.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
Appreciate the feedback, Lee.
I purchased the 12 and 17 year DoubleWood together just to do a nice, comparative side by side tasting and found both to be very mundane. The fact that the 17 was $70 more only made matters worse. I have been, and will continue, to avoid Balvenie for the foreseeable future. They aren't worth the price tag IMO.
Thanks, Pranay. Good to know that it is t just me.
I agree----I think Balvenie is recently in the category of "makes a nice name brand Scotch gift to the non-Scotch drinker". Too expensive for what it offers