LeeEvolved
Highland Park Fire Edition
Single Malt — Islands, Scotland
Reviewed
September 23, 2017 (edited October 21, 2024)
I originally opened both Highland Park Fire and Ice edition bottles at a get together with a few friends to coincide with the season 7 finale of Game of Thrones. I have been sipping on both since then and I think I'm ready to get my thoughts and impressions down, starting here with the Fire Edition. It's 15 year old whisky that spent its entire life in refilled, port wine casks. It comes in at 45.2% ABV and there were just under 4,400 bottles available for the U.S. market.
In the glass, it appears very oily. Give it a spin and it creates a thick, oil slick that sticks to the walls and only slowly grows thin legs as it settles. It's not as dark as I'd expected a port wine finished whisky to be. Some reviewers claim there's a reddish hue in there but I suspect they may have sat the glass close to the bright red bottle and are picking up its reflection, lol.
It was a very surprising tasting from start to finish, and not necessarily in a good way. On the nose, even after 15-20min, I still get mostly oak. There's cinnamon notes in abundance, too. It masks any sweetness I expected from the wine barrel. I also don't get any smoke. Strike One.
The palate is pretty lively, especially for Highland Park. I seem to recall most of the HP juices I've tried always seem well aged, smooth with a heavier-than-most mouthfeel. Fire feels young, like a NAS whisky bottled a bit too soon. Citrus peel and spicy oak lead the way into a lightly smoked mid-sip. The mouthfeel is thinner and causes all the flavor to fade somewhat quickly. Subtle smoke finally shows up on the exhale and that saves this from being a complete letdown. Strike One-and-a-Half.
The finish is medium-long with some strong, bitter chocolate notes mingling with the smoke. A balanced warmth settles across your mouth and is this whisky's saving grace. That's the Highland Park I know and love.
Did you notice not much was said of the port finish? It's because it's non-existent to me. All of the magic that may have been in those barrels must've been summoned elsewhere. That makes this offering so disappointing. I absolutely adore peated, port finished whisky, so even though I may have expected the impossible, this doesn't come close to delivering. Strike Two.
The ridiculous packaging and price tag are Strike Three. I can't recommend this one when you can purchase almost 3 bottles of the awesome 18 year old for the price of this one. 3 stars. Try it if you can find it in a bar for a reasonable price, but I'd avoid buying a bottle until the price drops significantly. Cheers.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
I've had a bottle of the HP 25 tucked away for about 6 months now waiting for the proper time to open it. I've shifted my focus away from buying to invest and I think I'll slowly be opening everything, even for life's littlest of accomplishments. I woke up before noon today! Time to open that Laphroaig 30, lol.
Nailed it. I tasted both Ice & Fire recently, and although they were an interesting experience, I never even considered buying a bottle. I rather used the cash I could have spent on Ice & Fire to buy HP 25. Never regretted that choice!
@ Pranay- IMHO, this one seems like something they had really high hopes for but as they kept sampling it over the last few years they realized the casks were spent. Being as it isn't a finished whisky, but rather a completely port cask aged juice tells the real truth here, I think. Letting it sit another 3-5 years wouldn't have improved it and ate up valuable warehouse space. Once they realized this was as good as it was gonna get, they bottled it. The marketing gurus worked their magic and made it part of a series, bedazzled the packaging, and BAM! here it is. The fact it's still sitting on shelves everywhere tells the real tale.
Totally agree...it's good, but not $300-400 good. Wondering if it's targeted more towards collectors to keep on their shelves than drink?