LeeEvolved
Tullibardine 228 Burgundy Finish
Single Malt — Highlands, Scotland
Reviewed
February 10, 2018 (edited April 10, 2020)
Not only was this the final sample I had remaining from our last round of group samples, I also decided to do a little comparison with another burgundy wine finished whisky from another friend: the Springbank 12 Burgundy Cask. It only took a small sip to realize that was a bad idea so I abandoned the comparison and decided to let them both speak for themselves. First up, the Tullibardine 228 Burgundy finish.
This one comes in at 43% ABV and is a beautiful pinkish-gold in the taster. Spinning it reveals quick forming water droplets and skinny legs. Plenty of water used to bring down the percentage- I hope it doesn’t dull the flavor.
The nose was heavily oak and alcohol astringency in the beginning. I had to let this one breathe for over a half an hour before the more subtle notes appeared. When they did it was mostly ripened berries and vanilla. The oak had really faded into the background and that was a welcome experience. It was way too overpowering in the beginning. Patience on the nose is very necessary.
The palate arrives with a peppery, oak blast but by mid sip it has settled down nicely and the mild, fruitiness takes over: pears, strawberries and green grapes. The vanilla notes usher in the finish.
The finish is where this one shows its flaws. It’s especially hot for a 43 percenter. Black pepper, oak and clove that go down a tad hard. This is not only evidence of the base whisky’s youth but probably the shorter finishing time in the wine cask. It doesn’t ruin the overall experience, but it definitely makes me want to dock it’s total score considerably. It should finish much better than it does.
Thanks again to @Generously_Paul for offering up this one for the group. It’s a fantastic nosing whisky that just falls on its face towards the end. 3.5 stars seems about right to me. Cheers.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
Correction bad casks or crap new make that should have been :-)
Yeah their aged stuff is great...20 yr i salute you. Their basic range is really rotten...dunno if crap casks, bad casks or both..
@PBMichiganWolverine - I remember that Omaruvian. You sent me a pour and I thought it was incredible. The Springbank was just funky on the nose and a bit too strong on the palate. It really did seem like a brandy. It was good, make no mistake, I just think the Springbank characteristics were overpowered and lost. I posted a full review if you want to read it.
@LeeEvolved. Was the Springbank burgundy too winey? I remember having a New Zealand Oamaruvian that spend 6 years in a wine cask. Was 5 years 6 months too much.
I think I may have enjoyed this one more had I not had the Springbank Burgundy 12 alongside it. They were two different levels of wine cask scotches (which is to be expected when one spends its entire life in the cask.)
I loved it. Well, I liked it a lot. It was pretty good. Shut up ☹️