islay_emissary
Lagavulin 16 Year (White Horse Distillers)
Single Malt — Islay, Scotland
Reviewed
July 26, 2018 (edited February 16, 2024)
Historical Footnote:
I recently contacted the Lagavulin distillery seeking information on Lagavulin 16, first introduced in 1988. They confirmed what I had learned earlier, but offered some additional details. Since 1974, all Lagavulin distillates have utilized the same malted barley sourced from nearby Port Ellen Maltings. The malt comes in with a phenol count (smokiness) between 34 and 38 ppm and does not vary outside this range. This expression has enjoyed a nice 30-year run; however, the distillery has made little effort differentiating between bottlings, and this has left whisky enthusiasts scrambling to zero in on the different eras of production. The name "White Horse Distillers" traces its roots back to 1924 when the distillery was owned by the Mackie family. The "White Horse Distillers" designation has remained on Lagavulin products well into the 20th century despite ownership changes. Its removal from product labels and boxes has been a source for debate here recently on Distiller. Since this occurred during the lifespan of Lagavulin 16, knowing the actual year would become a good point of demarcation for gauging release dates. For this information, Lagavulin recommended I contact a couple of UK auction houses whose names they supplied. I contacted these 2 along with 6 others and received responses from 6 of the 8 within 24 hours, so many thanks to Whisky Auctioneer, Whisky.Auction, Whisky Hammer, Just Whisky, McTear's Auctioneers, and Scotch Whisky Auctions for their prompt replies. The findings were very consistent. The "White Horse Distillers" designation was removed from the Lagavulin box and label circa 1999 and not long after the Diageo merger of 1997. Bottles from the late 80's and early 90's are considered the most desirable, since they likely contain whisky made from malted barley dried in-house when Lagavulin hosted their own floor malting operation and kilning. They can be distinguished by gold lettering on bottle at both sides of narrow vertical label. The gold lettering spells "1816" (left) and "Isla" (right). The earliest bottles do not display the "Classic Malts" logo at top of bottle’s green carton. The next oldest show "Classic Malts" logo on top-left of box (mid-1990's). The late-90's releases of White Horse feature "1816" and "Isla" lettering molded/embossed into glass and "Classic Malts" logo on top-middle of box. The Lagavulin 16, White Horse edition, I reviewed earlier was part of the later bottlings.
200.0
USD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@Rick_M no—I’ve never bought anything from auction. Just refuse to pay the premiums and do bidding wars on popular bottles. I bought it ages ago during my business trips to EU / UK, but definitely not in the 90s...was still in college then.
@PBMichiganWolverine - how did you find the earlier one? Auction?
@Rick_M yeah but I won’t sell either one of them. Will drink it...hopefully with a side by side comparing to a modern era 16
@PBMichiganWolverine - if you search the auctions you will see the earlier bottles bring over $300 whereas the later bring $200 and over. This tells me that there’s a lot of folks out there that know a lot about whiskey that don’t necessarily hang around here.
@Rick_M I just spent some time researching my bottle—-late 80s / early 90s version on one, late 90s on the other one.
@Rick_M I eat it up so please keep sharing!
@Whiskali - glad you liked it! I’ll add you to the list with myself and the other 3 people in the whole world that cares about that information. :)
Wow, this is fantastic info; thanks for sharing!
@PBMichiganWolverine - great article, thanks! The author brings up a great point about availability of these bottles. They can still be had in the $200 range. I think this is a tremendous buy, but I also realize these sentiments are biased based on my love of Lagavulin and the historian in me.
@Soba45 @cascode @Rick_M interesting article today on Malt-review.com on this one
Impressive perseverance! The journey you took to get the info was very interesting
@Rick_M Useful information - thank you for following up on this.
@PBMichiganWolverine - sorry, current releases “do not” have logo at top of green box.
@Rick_M damn it. Then I have no idea...I threw that away years ago...since I thought this was a regular 16.
@PBMichiganWolverine - no, I’m referring to the physical box the bottle comes in. Current releases do have the logo on box. It was only there for a handful of years.
But my back label has Classic Malts in the middle. So, I’m guessing I’m late 90s too
@Rick_M you’re the man! I’m impressed by your perseverance and determination. By “Classic Malts” logo on Box, you mean that rectangular box bottom part of bottle, below the oval? I don’t have Classic Malts in that rectangular box at all.