cascode
Glenglassaugh Pedro Ximenez Sherry Wood Finish
Single Malt — Highland, Scotland
Reviewed
February 20, 2019 (edited February 28, 2022)
Glenglassaugh tasting evening, Sydney, Feb 19th. Whisky #4
Nose:
The good: Honeycake, current biscuits, strawberry shortcake, maple syrup, vanilla.
The bad: Rubber galoshes, fusty amontillado, baby sick, nail varnish, gentian violet (!).
Palate: A bold and full arrival with raisins, chocolate and salty caramel characteristics. As it developed there was a note of stewed fruits (apricots, peaches) and sticky date pudding. Water seemed to make the palate dryer (maybe uncovered tannin?).
Finish: Medium/long. Dry fruity notes that fade out into a sweet aftertaste.
One of the strangest malts I've tasted, and I'm convinced the sample we had was from a badly sulphured cask.
The nose had much more dry sherry than PX influence, and the oak notes and sherry seemed to be in a personal feud instead of contributing to the spirit. Overall the nose was sharply funky and confronting - way beyond an interesting challenge.
The palate fared much better and was somewhat Macallan-like, although bolder and darker. However I could not help but feel that the cask was a poor choice for the distillate - although as said above, maybe it was just this particular cask.
The group was sharply divided on this expression - most found it delightful and it was their favourite of the core-range expressions we tasted on the night. However a handful (myself included) thought it was repulsive on the nose. I would rate it 3.5 except for these odd aromas, but as it is I can't see any reason to give it more than 2. I would, however, be very interested to try this again at some stage from a different batch.
"Adequate" : 70/100 (2 stars)
125.0
AUD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
I thought that this one was seriously flawed too. They'd have been wise to blend this with something else IMHO.