LeeEvolved
Serendipity
Blended Malt — Islay, Speyside, Scotland
Reviewed
August 6, 2019 (edited August 10, 2019)
So, you may have noticed that I haven’t written a review in almost 3 weeks. Why? Well, my buddy @Generously_Paul started a whisky review channel on YouTube and asked me to help create some content to help get the channel, Dapper Drams, off the ground. I made the decision to combine my 500th Distiller review and a segment on the channel, called Fresh Takes, simultaneously. This was the bottle I used to kick things off. The video is also live so check it out: https://youtu.be/yncYKtWFxHc
Anyway, a little about Serendipity: it’s a blend of very old Ardbeg and some Glen Moray 12. Why would they choose to blend those you might ask? They didn’t. It was an accident at the bottling plant: while bottling Ardbeg 17 back in 2005 the vat operator accidentally dumped the Glen Moray into the vat BEFORE the Ardbeg was done. Well, Ardbeg wasn’t about to dump all that whisky (14,000+ bottles worth) so they bought out Glen Moray’s part and bottled it as a blend for their Committee Members. It was offered at £30 back in early 2006. Needless to say, many bottles have found their way to U.K. retailers and auctions. That’s where I got my bottle for around $170.
Serendipity is straw gold and makes some thick, undefined legs in the Glencairn. It leaves behind a watery rim without any droplets after a quick spin. The nose begins with some very faint oak, light sherry and some grape must. There’s little to no smoke, initially, along with no heat- because it’s bottled at 40% ABV. After some significant time, over an hour, the sweetness faded and some BBQ smoke was finally released.
The palate is all Ardbeg: BBQ brisket and bacon that seems heavily salted. It’s ultra smooth with some minerality lingering well past mid sip. There’s a tiny amount of zesty lime and a faint sweetness on the back end (from the Glen Moray, I presume). Again, no heat whatsoever, so don’t add water at all (why would you at 40% anyways). The finish is medium length and quite buttery and tame. It leaves behind an oily mouth coat with a little bit of smoke and ash to contend with, but it’s very mild. It’s the dram’s only possible fault IMO.
Overall, it’s not the 5 star-surprise, smoked sherry bomb I was hoping for, but the two malts do play well together. There’s one major surprise I discovered about this malt while researching it, but I’m not going to tell you what it is here in an effort to blackmail you faithful readers and followers to check out the Fresh Take video on Paul’s YouTube channel- Dapper Drams. Please go check it out, give it a like and maybe subscribe to his channel. Tell a friend and check out some of the other videos we’ve done, as well. You can even check back often as we try to post a new video every 9-10 days. Thanks.
As for a score, well I think it’s easily a 3.75 star dram, and after you find out the secret about this bottle, I think that’s worthy of a .25-.5 star bump. So I’m giving this 4.25 stars. Thanks for reading and following me through my 500th official whisky review. I look forward to 500 more (if my liver can take it, lol). Cheers, my friends.
170.0
USD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
Congrats on 500 reviews! That's quite an achievement. I always enjoy reading your reviews.
@Richard-ModernDrinking yeah...I totally mislabeled the blind samples. Made for a very interesting challenge.
@Rick_M SEO...search engine optimization. Cost a bit though.
Nice review and worthy of 500. Cheers, and here’s to 500 more !
Great review, very interesting backstory. Never heard anything like it! Will have to check out the video now. Congrats on 500!
@LeeEvolved Congrats and thanks for contributing 500 great reviews to Distiller! A great choice for the landmark review. Cheers!
Do a search for a popular scotch followed by the word “reviews” and often ralfy or the guy from whisky.com videos will pop up on the 1st page. I suppose if you do a couple hundred of these you guys may pop up along with them.
@Rick_M I am completely inept in that department. So far it’s just us trying to spread the word. I’m sure there are plenty of options if you are willing to spend money, which I am not.
@LeeEvolved - yes, it flowed very well.
@Generously_Paul - how do you plan on driving traffic to your channel? There is some black magic needed for success with this stuff (search engine seeding).
@Rick_M - thanks- we’ve been trying to listen to everyone’s inputs. Shorter is better and I tried filming longer sections so that Paul wouldn’t have to overly edit them. It does flow much better that way.
@Rick_M you’ve got to be the most critical of my edits. I’m working on it, but it all depends if the execution of the lines by the “actor”. @LeeEvolved is better at it than I am, therefore fewer edits needed. Myself not so much
@LeeEvolved @Generously_Paul - excellent job on the video. Everything worked. Perfect length; minimal edits; lots of interesting info delivered in an interesting fashion.
Congrats on 500! With the amount of time I’m putting into these videos I’ll be lucky to hit 400 by New Years 2021
I’ve been enjoying the videos, especially the one where @Generously_Paul confidently declares that @PBMichiganWolverine mislabeled the blind samples.
How do you keep a fool in suspense? I'll tell you on my YouTube channel. Congrats on the milestone 🎉