LeeEvolved
Highland Park 10 Year Rebus
Single Malt — Islands, Scotland
Reviewed
August 21, 2019 (edited August 30, 2019)
Oh, Highland Park! I thought to myself when my buddy @Generously_Paul sent me a pour of this themed, 10yo release from 2017. Is this another subpar release where they use some crazy, Viking-esque type of label and packaging? Well, sort of, but I can give them a pass this time for the theming- and I actually thought the whisky was okay, as well. Rebus 30 is a 10 year old whisky (kind of confusing, ain’t it?) that was released to honor a fictional crime novel character who was celebrating his 30th year of existence. Highland Park joined with writer Ian Rankin for the 20th anniversary release back in 2007 with a release called Knots & Crosses- so, this line of bottles isn’t HP’s way of cashing in like the Viking lineage. There is an established history with this release- so, I’ll give them a pass on the theming. How is the actual whisky? That’s what we’re here to find out...
First of all, it’s bottled at 40% ABV and it’s chill filtered and probably has added coloring. It’s new gold in color and very oily. Slow forming, skinny legs fall down the sides of your Glencairn followed by heavy, runny drops after a healthy spin. The nose has an odd, barnyard funk right off the bat, smoke is also mysteriously absent. Sherry cask flavors and honey-dipped berries and cereal malt form the crux of the whisky after a few minutes resting in the glass. Like a good mystery novel, this whisky is leading you down a strange path in its early chapters.
The palate strikes right away with honeycomb, toasted almonds, dry roast peanuts and very light, sherry sweetness. Again, the smoke is still MIA on the front end. Some minerality and earthy peat creep in on the backside of the tongue. There’s no campfire smoke or briny characters in the mix. It’s oily and full on the tongue but lacking in barrel spice and heat because the ABV is too low. Drinkability is up, but it doesn’t feel as though there’s much whisky in my whisky, and that’s the ultimate reason this whisky gets lower marks.
The finish should be where the novel (whisky) reveals its twist, but this isn’t M Night Shamalayan, it’s a British guy so...it’s still rather tame. There is a tiny bit of smoke, but it’s closer to barrel char than smoldering, campfire embers. It’s also short, weak and a little unfulfilling. Some lingering berry sweetness is detected but it fades quickly and rather harmlessly.
So, how do I score this thing? Well, I don’t want to penalize it for it’s theming- I’m cool with paying homage to a British crime author. At least it’s a break from the unrelenting Viking stuff. The 10yo age statement doesn’t add or hurt the score either. The best part about this is that it’s funkier than most HP stuff. I can appreciate that, I guess. I can’t give it a boost for complexity because thats not in the cards, either. All these factors accounted for- I say this is a 3-3.25 star release. This whisky just isn’t mysterious enough to make you read more into it (puns galore). It’s a cool enough bottle for the HP fanboys, but everyone else can shrug this one off and look elsewhere. Thanks again Paul, for the sample. Cheers.
• also, Paul has a humorous, video review for this very whisky over on his YouTube channel- Dapper Drams. Check it out if you’d like to see (better) tasting notes from him and watch his brother just struggle, in general, with being new to scotch whisky.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
Always remember that HP and Macallan never add colorant, it’s one thing you can always count on from them.
@PBMichiganWolverine Yeah I agree. For me the 40% is often an indication the target market maybe more the 'I don't like anything to strong and I drink old school blends like Grants' or they are going for cheap bulk however I've had great ones at 40% and if it's a highly rated one I have no compulsions buying. Often it's a great dram it's just at 40% cos that was what the mkt was used to donkeys ago and they never changed. Bushmills 21, Kilbeggan 21, Glenfiddich age of discovery, Redbreast 12. Having said that looking at my average scores for the 40% ones they are quite low.
@Rick_M so true. I used to buy Yamazaki 18 for $80. Now, we’ll over $600?!? That’s silly money. I can fly to Japan for that price.
For their good stuff, that is. Stuff selling for $80 or more.
@PBMichiganWolverine @LeeEvolved. A few short years ago that $160 bottle was selling for $120 and good whisky could be had for $30 to 40 bucks. You wanna charge me an arm and a leg for whiskey.....fine, but put something in the damn bottle. Compass Box has the right idea. Nothing under 46% ABV.
@Rick_M @LeeEvolved why is the 40% a deal breaker? I sort of view 40-46% as “ If I need water, it’s a few drops only”, and 46%+ as “ I need to figure out the sweet spot of water addition”
@Rick_M - are you sure that the “ah-hah” moment you experienced wasn’t the fact you realized that you were about to spend $160 on an Irish whiskey, more than the 40% part? 😜
@LeeEvolved - yes, i agree, but it’s a matter of principle with me. Recently, I was ready to spring $160 for a Midleton Very Rare and the 40% abv killed the deal on the way to the register.
@Rick_M - honestly, I’ve had some damn fine 40 “percenters”. I can look passed the weaker ABV if there’s depth or some other surprises. Initially, it’s always a red flag when I spot it, though. Teaser- my next Fresh Takes video on Paul’s channel will be another 40 banger. Fingers crossed it delivers the age statement it represents.
@LeeEvolved - I’m surprised the 40% abv didn’t piss you off more. :)
@Soba45 totally agree——their generic Viking themed ones - stay away. The Ice and Fire were very good, anf I’ve found their mid-age full sherry matured are really good.
@Slainte-Mhath Yeah unless it is a very highly reviewed one like Ice I stay away. So many boring middling NASs they pump out these days
Great review, @LeeEvolved. Living in Norway, I am especially annoyed that Highland Park uses (or better abuses?) the Viking theme for marketing purposes. I liked Highland Park back in the days, but all this rebranding and flood of subpar NAS expressions is really putting me off.