Nose: Sharp and rubbery with alcohol clearly detectable. There is a confusion of generic “scotch whisky” aromas including an indeterminate sherried fruitiness, but the rubbery presence that betrays a heavy dose of young sub-par grain whisky is constant. It reminds me of Grant’s Reserve but it's marginally better as there is a very mild fragrant cereal note, like the smell of a muesli bar.
Palate: Sweet and hot on the arrival, turning towards a sweet astringency on the tongue. Gritty (yes gritty - not gristy) cereal notes and a vague suggestion of some sort of fruit as it sits in the mouth. The texture is fairly neutral. Again it reminds me of a thin-bodied version of Grants. There are also times when the taste of ethanol is clearly discerned on the palate.
Finish: Short. Hard semi-sour cereal notes that trail off into a surprisingly sweet aftertaste. One thing I will admit, it avoids the common bitter metallic finish of many cheap blends. It gains a quarter-star for that.
This is a very cheap blended scotch – the cheapest you can buy in Australia at AUS$33 a bottle – and it only requires a cursory nose and taste to realize that it is very grain-heavy. I’d be surprised if there is more than 5% malt content in this blend. What you are experiencing here is pretty much just grain spirit that has matured for the requisite 3 years in old tired casks that were on their final legs, plus a spattering of various young malt whiskies.
You'll never see this anywhere except Australia as it is only produced for the domestic market by Pinnacle Drinks, a Sydney-based company that markets a range of bargain priced sourced drinks under house names (eg Nelson County bourbon, Buckeye rum, Houndstooth gin, etc.). Their business strategy is to undercut the bottom-shelf “name” brands by a few dollars and they sell exclusively through supermarkets and supermarket-owned liquor shops.
The whisky is distilled, blended and bottled in Scotland but the source is unidentified - it could be a major producer or a third-party blender/broker and it's entirely possible that exactly the same stuff is sold elsewhere under a different name.
It's a better whisky than some of the other bottom-shelf blends like Label 5, Castle Rock or Highland Earl, but it isn’t quite as good as the next shelf up where you'll find whiskies like J&B and Vat 69.
By the way – dilution does this no favours as it unveils bitter and harsh notes. It's just barely acceptable but personally I’d find a few dollars more and buy something worth drinking.
“Inferior” : 65/100 (1.5 stars)
33.0
AUD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@jonwilkinson7309 & @geologyjane Whenever I finish a whisky that was in an interesting bottle I hang onto it for use as an infinity bottle of for experiments like this. For some odd reason all my bottles of this type are former bourbon or rye bottles. Those Scots are just too conservative.
@cascode I love those experiments as well, and I keep a good stock of 4 ounce bottles on hand to blend on a very small scale. Always interesting.
I love a Frankenmalt experiment that works out - seems very appropriate for Halloween!
An added note to this tasting. Last night I tried some remedial blending using it and had very good results. I poured 300ml of 1495 into an empty whisky bottle (one of my infinity bottles that I was not currently using). To this I added 30ml of Blair Athol 12 year old. The addition of just this small amount of robust malt made a remarkable difference, rounding out the profile of the blend substantially. The result is a little like Bells Original but softer and fruitier. I’ve tried such experiments before but this was the most surprising in the degree to which such a small adjustment improved the base blend. It also confirmed my opinion that 1495 blended scotch is a fundamentally good product that has been stretched too far and needs a little more malt to top-dress the grain. Next, I split the 300ml that remained after I’d taken a tasting dram and to one half I added 5ml (about a teaspoon) of Ardbeg 10. The result was vaguely similar to Johnnie Walker Double Black. It’s amazing how little smoky whisky needs to go into a blend to have a profound effect.