ScotchingHard
Craigellachie 13 Year
Single Malt — Speyside, Scotland
Reviewed
August 28, 2020 (edited October 14, 2020)
Bottled in 2015.
This is one of my favorite widely available standard release single malts of all time. Not many people will share the same opinion because it can be difficult to appreciate this whisky because it’s ugly on the outside, but beautiful within. If you need either the pleasant simple sweetness of a Balvenie or the rich barbeque smoke of a Lagavulin in all of your whiskies, then Craigellachie is probably not for you.
The distinguishing character of Craigellachie is sulfur, which is intentional and embraced, even more so than with Springbank. The sulfur is that of a tinderbox and some very, very dry-aged meat. Other than that, Craigellachie is hard to describe other than admitting that it is indeed very complex. The labeling suggests Craigellachie is “anything but smooth” and “rivals whiskies twice its age.” So, if you fancy a feisty little old lady carrying around a tinderbox to smoke some unsauced bone-dry meats, then Craigellachie is probably for you.
This 13 year old is actually one of my favorite expressions, and certainly the only official release that offers value for money (older Craigellachies are rather hard to find and prohibitively expensive). There is little to no sherry influence here, and the whisky needs none. There are some light, floral, and fruity elements with apples and oranges, but there is definitely an interesting taint to these familiar flavors. Imagine a man named Glenfiddich smoking some peyote. The light fruitiness is warped by the earthy sulfury smoke of Craigellachie, and it starts to even be reminiscent of tequila and mezcal.
My only complaint is the wood has influenced this beautiful spirit too much. All of the releases from Craigellachie have prime number age statements, and an 11 year old Craigellachie in a spent bourbon cask would be perfect. The spirit has enough bombast to do without needing the bombast of some active American oak.
Score: ** (unimaginably good)
How much does a bottle cost?: $50-70
How much do I think a bottle is worth?: $95
64.0
USD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@ScotchingHard Great review! I have a bottle of Craigellachie 13 waiting patiently to be opened. Looking forward to pop the cork.
@cascode Wow, that's a lot for the 13 YO. It's about USD$55 over here. The 17 is around $140 though, so that lines up pretty well.
@ScotchingHard Yeah, it was! Didn't bother mentioning because I figured the odds of anyone being able to compare such an obscure bottle were slim. Thanks for that info.
Great review - I'd say that the 17 year old is also worth the money. Over here this 13 year old is AUS$125 and the 17 is AUS$175, and it's a better dram all-round for my palate (and the 13 is good to start with). I'd fully agree, however, that anything older from this distillery's OBs is absurdly overpriced.
@ContemplativeFox was that the Classic Cask Craigellachie? I have that 11 yo, and I like it even more than this one.
Huh, I always think of Craigellachie as something that gets thrown in blends, but apparently I had an 11 YO independent bottling of it that I thought was pretty good. The price on this one seems pretty good, but sadly despite being available from numerous sources it isn't available from anyone I've bought from before. Sounds worth seeking out though. Thanks for seconding the sentiment @Ctrexman
This shi* is thick, rich and flavorfull
Everything about this review says "mezcal", from the sulfur to the young age and desire for less aging. I see why it's hard to approach. There's definitely room for well executed sulfur in whisky just like there is for peat, but pretty much nobody gets it right. Delighted they worked it out here!