SpartaTodd
Edradour 2009 10 Year Un-Chillfiltered Collection (Signatory)
Single Malt — Highlands, Scotland
Reviewed
January 6, 2021 (edited January 23, 2021)
Edradour 10-year-old Signatory Vintage: A Tale of Two Edradours...
This is a cautionary tale! I am a big fan of SV and have had some really outstanding cask strength offerings from them so far. I had heard a lot about Edradour so I dipped my toe in the water and got a bottle of the 10 year from the SV unchill-filtered collection. It is proofed down to 46% and unceremoniously marketed. The bottle I got was 2008 cask 359. Because SV owns Edradour I assume they have access to picking out the best casks and blending the rest. This bottle was wonderful. It is the kind of nutty/jammy sherried scotch that I like (I assume Oloroso), not a sherry bomb like Aberlour A'bunadh or Glendronach 21. It reminds me of Benrinnes Flora and Fauna which I love (alas I have not had the legendary 22/23 Benrinnes).
I have a different bottling than this bottling in Distiller. This is the actual bottling: https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/132958/edradour-2008-sv
Nose: baking spices, cinnamon, dark fruit
Palate: Sweet, Rich and semi-viscous. A little spicy. Coats the mouth. Berry jam.
Finish: Medium, spices and dark fruit
Rating: 4.25 out of 5 stars
This was the Edradour I had heard of. A really great and affordable whisky that was young but had made the most of those 10 years. I loved it so I bought another bottle but I was unaware of the perils of single casks...
This is the next bottle I got. It was actually from an earlier bottling: https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/147758/edradour-2007-sv
Nose: baking spices, cinnamon, dark fruit, a little sulphur
Palate: spicy, some sulphur, the dark fruit is muted
Finish: Very bitter and too much wood.
Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
I went from the highs to the lows with these bottlings and I have learned my lesson about the variability of single cask offerings. However, it makes me wonder... there are many stories of bad single casks such as the sulphurous "ditch water" of Highland Park, etc. Why would a distillery put out such a bad or borderline bad offering? Why not try to bury it in a blend instead? I get that they need to make money on as much of their production as possible. It is always about money. Does anyone know what happens to sub-par casks? I assume they try to finish some in some type of cask to try and fix them or put them in a blend to hide their characteristics. Do distilleries ever dump aged stock as just unpalatable? I am always wary of IBs because I assume the distilleries will ditch their less successful product on them. I assume that sometimes it can be salvaged but I have read many examples of bad IB bottlings. Please comment and discuss!
80.0
USD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@chrisc8888 I wonder if your 2007 was the same as mine. I have seen that all across the US a SV release is usually the same barrel. I like SV and find them generally good so I am perplexed why they dump mediocre bottlings on their customers. It seems like they should be hidden in a blend. I also believe that a really good 10 year sherried Edradour is close to the pinnacle of affordable Scotch. The good ones are amazing.
I’ve also found these are really hit or miss. I picked up a bottle from a shop in Scotland (mostly because of the rich dark color). It was absolutely phenomenal. I then picked up 2 similar bottles in the US, 2007 and 2008 vintage. 2007 wasn’t great, 2008 was good but not as good as the 2009. I then a bought a few bottles online from the 2009 series thinking it would be like the cask from my standout bottle. They’re very good but not quite the same. Unfortunately checking the color of the bottle to somewhat estimate the cask quality is difficult to do online shopping!