ContemplativeFox
Booker's Bourbon Batch 2019-04 "Beaten Biscuits"
Bourbon — Kentucky , USA
Reviewed
March 1, 2022 (edited November 5, 2023)
Rating: 16/23
I go back and forth on how premium Booker's is. There's no argument that it's young (it says so on the label), but I've quite enjoyed a fair number of Booker's releases. At the same time though, there are certainly duds. Let's see how this one is.
N: High proof: the alcohol hits first. After that, I get minerals, a bit of youthful meatiness, a small bit of sweet corn aged on wood, a touch of dusty sawdust, and just the faintest herbal funk and vanilla scents.
P: Minerals with some cherry, a bit of vanilla and licorice, very mild nuttiness, and a substantial alcohol bite. Substantial spices, with ginger, black pepper, clove, and cinnamon leading it. Possibly a hint of chili pepper. The black licorice grows. There's plenty of viscosity here to drive the proof home. Beyond the sour mash tartness, there's a little richness from the sweet corn, but it isn't very strong. I want to believe that there's some real complexity going on here, but I don't. There is eventually a nice bit of musty peanut though. A bit of tangerine as well. Perhaps sort of a clover honey bitterness and sweetness.
F: The spices get earthier with more dust and chili pepper. Occasional wafts of musty, funky peanut and black licorice.
- Conclusion -
I'm pretty confident that Booker's Shiny Barrel (19/23) is better than this is. This strikes me as one of the less compelling Booker's releases. So it's not higher than an 18. And an 18 seems a bit high.
Side by side, my bottle of Resilient 15 (18/23) seems just as complex but also more mature and balanced. There are things to like better about this, but between the two, I think that the Resilient is better. This is funkier, which I can certainly appreciate, but the alcohol bit and minerality really bring it down.
Going for a lower bound here, I think that this is a bit better than Russell's Reserve 10 (15-16/23), but it isn't a whole lot better. This is going to be a 16 or 17. I'd probably give this a slightly higher score than Uncle Nearest 1856 (15/23), reinforcing that it's in the 16 to 17 range.
George Dickel Bottled In Bond (2005) (16/23) is mellower with a nicer, sweeter richness, albeit with less interesting, funky complexity.
Corsair Ryemageddon (17/23) stands out as being more complex and tasty with better balance, while also tasting a bit more mature. somehow.
In the end, I think it's that bit of meatiness here that pushes this down to a 16. This, unfortunately, is not one of the better Booker's batches.
Thanks for sharing this @ctbeck11 ! With Booker's prices through the roof, getting to try a release is a rare treat these days.
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@ContemplativeFox I have a Donahue’s open, maybe I can send you a sample?
@ctbeck11 Yeah, Tagalong was a standout. Wish I'd gotten to try Donohue's.
That’s been my experience as well…brash and hot. I had a small pour of the 30th anniversary one, which was amazing. But that asking price is silly.
I’d love to try a bunch of Booker’s side-by-side. Most are good, but pretty hot. Tagalong was great though.