ScotchingHard
Compass Box This Is Not a Luxury Whisky
Blended — Scotland
Reviewed
September 6, 2018 (edited October 2, 2023)
This is not a review.
The bottle is very interesting. The contents are interesting too. But not as much as the bottle, which is ironic. The bottle misses the irony, as well. It should be labeled “This is not luxury.” The famous painting this Compass Box release draws inspiration from is a Rene Magritte painting of a cigar pipe that reads “Ceci n’est pas une pipe (This is not a pipe).” And it’s not a pipe. The painting is an abstraction of the object. This bottle of whisky is an object, and luxury is the abstraction. Hence, potentially, Compass Box could have had the clever, artful flip, scrutinizing an object representing the abstraction; the opposite of Magritte’s painting. But they missed the cleverness. “This Is Not a Luxury Whisky” is just a clunky reference that feels like a gimmick. And the message telling you that a whisky is about the liquid, and it should be drank is nauseating exposition. “This Is Not Luxury” would have been the perfect name. No exposition. I mean, you can include notes and objective information. But I hate being told how to interpret something.
And it’s not luxury. It’s got grain in it. 40 year old grain whisky, but it’s grain whisky, and I’m not into it. Not my thing. Most of this whisky is 19 year old Glen Ord malt, and that gives this blend a Highland fruity and floral base. But I can’t escape the feeling that when you mix 40 year old grain with a 19 year old malt, you get something that tastes like a 15 year old whisky. It’s those acetone, banana notes. It’s richer and more oily here, but it’s not something I immediately am going to like.
Yeah, I’m not sure about the grain. It’s one of those things that is interesting for me, but not necessarily attractive. Like dwarves. Anyways, the grain loses its grip on the spotlight quickly, and things get better. The finish is one of the most dynamic and complex of any whisky I’ve had. The Islay minority that was suppressed on the nose, and the arrival, starts to unpretty this whisky, and it just goes back and forth between salty and savory, and sweet and toffied for a long time. And at 53.1% ABV, you get some great aftertastes if you exhale the right way.
Water in a blend generally kills the oldest components first. So, on the one hand, I may actually enjoy this more without the obvious contribution from the grain; on the other hand, adding water makes this more common, and less worth the price tag. This is a great whisky. Is it worth two Flaming Hearts? No.
PRESUMPTIVE MARK: 94/100.
235.0
USD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
Well done. Love the Magritte reference, and the verbification of "unpretty."
@SolanaRoots yes, that is a good price. This is definitely a distinctive whisky and a conversation piece.
@SolanaRoots 220!? Buy them all!
Great review...what do you think this bottle worth per your new rating system? I saw a dusty box for $220ish and am a bit tempted
The name of the painting that is referenced is actually ”La Trahison des images“ (“The Treachery of Images” in English) and that’s really Glaser’s point – deception. This release is really an excuse to promote his ongoing arguments in favour of full and accurate component disclosure being printed on the bottle, and perhaps it’s also a tongue-in-cheek snipe at his own typically luxurious and artistic printed labels. I don’t think it can be taken much more seriously than that, and to be honest I thought it was far from being the most luxurious Compass Box blend anyway. Maybe that was also intentional and the whole point?
@ScotchingHard King Julien from Madagascar
@Generously_Paul. You got me. Not ringing a bell
After much deep and profound brain things inside my head, I have decided to thank you for thoroughly overthinking a simple play on an obscure painting used to sell whisky. And to make you feel good I am going to give you this lovely parting gift... No, it’s not worth it, stick with Flaming Heart. (Bonus points if you can name the movie I’m paraphrasing without googling it)
@ScotchingHard - it’s a good thing you explained yourself because now I’m only 90% confused. 😊
@ScotchingHard. I like the irony of “this is not a review” 😊