BDanner
Elijah Craig Small Batch Bourbon
Bourbon — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed
December 18, 2018 (edited January 30, 2019)
This is my first review of this one since the Age Statement was dropped. Elijah Craig 12 was probably not the best bourbon, but if someone were to ask me 5 years ago to name the most bourbon-ish bourbon, I'd have said EC12 without hesitation. The toffee, butterscotch, vanilla, with a hearty oak backbone was my baseline for all other bourbons. I've had one other bottle of this, but it was a NC ABC single Barrel selection that was just over 8 yrs old if I recall. For that reason I didn't review it, but I remember it being fairly decent for the money. Let's see how the regular NAS Small Batch fares, shall we?
Nose: When first poured I get lots of alcohol and oak. Give it a few minutes to open up and a nice sweetness develops on the outer edges. Toffee, butterscotch, Karo Syrup, wrapping around the alcohol and oak in the center. You also get a touch of peanut brittle, orange peel and a little barrel funk. Very pleasant if you spend some time with it and allow it to breath a bit.
Neat: Prickly heat and a little on the thin side are my first thoughts. The sweetness from the nose carries over in vanilla and caramel. Dry roast peanut, orange peel and white pepper spice. Initially, a lot of heat for a 94 proofer, but that dissipates after a few sips. Finishes with a medium warmth, coating the palate with a slight bitterness and tingly pepper. A little (not enough for my taste) musty barrel note that I like in my older Heaven Hill stuff. I also remember my single barrel selection having a little creamier mouthfeel.
Splash: A few drops of water adds an herbal note to both nose and palate. Adds a little more vanilla, amplifies the barrel funk, and tames the heat. Weirdly, the musty oak note that I love in Henry Mckenna 10yr finally shows up when I nose the empty glass. This makes me think that some interaction with the oxygen in the bottle might make it more prominent in future pours.
Verdict: Man, I miss the 12 year old, but there are only a handful of bourbons better than this one in the $25-$30 range. My problem here is at the $29 regular price, it's only $6 less than the newly price increased personal favorite Henry Mckenna 10yr at $35. I got this bottle on sale for $25 which definitely helps. I still might consider this a "baseline" bourbon if someone were to ask (I think the HMcK10 is a little too unique to be a bourbon-ish bourbon) for a recommendation. It's a solid 4 Star choice.
29.0
USD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@WhiskeyMike901 ...I know. I cringe every time someone sings the praises of HMcK10. I could get it on sale occasionally here for around $26, but it just jumped to $35 in my ABC control state.
Great review sir! I think I could rotate between the McKenna and EC and be happy as a lark. Totally agree that the HMcK is a bit special/unique to be labeled a typical bourbon profile. I've noticed the McKenna must be gaining popularity, as prices are steadily increasing. A few months ago I could snag a bottle easily at about $32 but its creeping up closer to $40 at some stores. I really hope it doesn't end up suffering the same fate as B Trace bourbons with insane scarcity with prices to match. Maybe it's time to tell everyone McK sucks! :) Cheers!
@MountainRoot Thank you, sir!
Excellent review, sir!
Totally agree! Store Picks are a bonus as well.