Whiskey_Hound
West Cork Glengarriff Series Peat Charred Cask Single Malt
Single Malt — Ireland
Reviewed
January 17, 2020 (edited November 21, 2021)
A while back, I expressed interest in trying some unique Irish whiskies. @LeeEvolved gave me a nice list of Irish whiskies that stray from the norm. On this list were a handful of West Cork bottlings, a distillery I've been seeing more and more but have yet to try. Upon finding this, I decided to buy. It's a very interesting concept (not peated like Connemara but aged in peat-charred casks) and comes in one of the coolest of whiskey bottles I've seen to date.
Nose: Very green and grassy. Some vanilla sweetness. A bit of spearmint. Some rubber; somewhere between tire rubber and the rubber on a turf football field. Cinnamon and black pepper. Hay, wet grass, and tree bark. Citrus notes of orange and grapefruit, along with banana. Faint smoke. Confusing nose, but has grown more cohesive as I've worked through the bottle.
Palate: Vanilla and caramel. More of the grassy, earthy, green notes. Tree bark and hay. Some more spearmint. An interesting cured ham note. Pear, and, instead of apple, I'll go with Mott's apple sauce. More banana and grapefruit. Toffee and malt. Cinnamon, black pepper, and oak. Faintly smoky and ashy. Like with the nose, this has improved significantly since I've opened it. I initially got the rubbery notes from the nose, but am not getting them on this tasting.
Finish: Almost like banana Laffy Taffy. Toffee, vanilla, and honey sweetness. More banana. Spearmint and wintergreen. Cinnamon, black pepper, and oak carry out this surprisingly long finish.
Tough one to score. Admittedly, I came into this tasting ready to beat this one up. I had tried on three separate occasions, including earlier this week, and had not enjoyed it all. Yet, tonight, I had a very different experience with this one. Apart from the rubbery nose, everything just seemed more cohesive, balanced, and interesting.
Not for nothing, this is the first time I've tasted this out of glencairn. I've said this before, but glassware can have a massive impact on your experience with a particular expression, some more than others. For this reason, I only write my reviews when using a glencairn.
I've got a little over half a bottle left to figure this one out. Initially, I had this pegged at 2 stars flat. After having the benefit of time and a tasting from a glencairn, I've settled on a score of 2.75. I will likely update this review at least once. It's certainly a unique whiskey. Maybe not one I'd recommend, but it's growing on me.
42.0
USD
per
Bottle
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@1901 Thanks! I don't think I'll be dumping this but I'm certainly not impressed
@PBMichiganWolverine Hawaii is awesome. My wife desperately wants to return. Usually we do winter holidays to get some sun however sadly Tasmania is just as miserable that time of year!
@Soba45 our summer vacation this year seems to be Hawaii...unlike the fast 4 vacations ( Norway, Iceland, Lake District UK, and Oregon coast), it’ll be tropical hot and...no distillery visits.
@PBMichiganWolverine Nice! Should be exactly the same I'm thinking I paid $135. If it's good lll be getting another this year. I had waaay to much alcohol due it being the same trip as us visiting the Aussie vineyards and distillery's. Next time may however be South Africa when we get extensive house renos done so I'm thinking I'll be in exactly the same situation!
@Soba45 the redbreast 21 in duty free was about 1/2 as in the U S retail. I grabbed two bottles two years ago, at $125/each. I’m wondering if quality isn’t different ?
Connemara 22 yr peated was a very nice drop. Not sure how cheap and easy it is to get these days. The spot range: green, yellow and red definitely different from normal irish. Really enjoyed Dingle I had (batches vary). Got hold a bottle of Redbreast 21 quite cheap in Duty Free so that I'm looking forward to trying!
Nice review. I had the bog oak charred cask from the same series. Thought it rotten and had to dump. You're right about the age, I reckon
Exactly. I think this is just too young to accomplish its goal. If this was aged 10-12 years (which I'm guessing it's not even close to that range), I think this would be a fantastic product
Interesting concept but lacking in grade.