Reviews

My final entry in the Laphroaig core lineup is the expression that comes with the training wheels. The Select. The bare bones offering. Not a ton to say here other than this is the budget option. Let’s check it out. Nose: Heavy hazelnut. Campfire smoke and bandaid. Ash and rubber. Some salted caramel. Wintergreen. Milk chocolate. Apple cider. Black pepper and cinnamon. Palate: A little ballpark soft pretzel and hookah. Sea salt and brine. Caramel, vanilla, and toffee. Milk chocolate. More apple cider. Spearmint. Finish: Hazelnut. Vanilla and caramel. Heavy on the salted caramel and saltwater taffy. Bandaid and iodine. Cinnamon and black pepper. Spearmint. Sea salt. Very standard Laphroaig profile. Just a bit watered down. I like this. But I can also see how this would be designed for use in smoky cocktails. Because the 10 is their entry level, flagship offering, and it does everything better than this. At $48, it’s not a bad value. I think this should be capped at $40, but I guess this isn’t out of line with inflation. You can absolutely skip this one and go right to the 10 year, but this is by no means a bad whisky. 2.75/5.

Entry #3 for me in the Tale series. Winter was pretty solid, Forest was a bit of a miss. High vanillin cask is a new element. This one features that and bourbon. Very interested in seeing how this plays out. Nose: A bit orange citrus pop right out of the gate. Followed by vanilla, butterscotch, and toffee. Orange cream soda. Floral notes and fruit, apple, pear, and apricot specifically. Some green grape and golden raisin. Coconut and macadamia. Almond and walnut. Nonparelis and chocolate biscotti. Sugar cookie and vanilla frosting. Palate: Plush. A hit of date and fig. Golden raisin. Apple, pear, and apricot. There’s some chocolate and ice cream cake—and I promise that’s not informed by the packaging. Graham cracker and vanilla frosting. Sugar cookie. Orange citrus. Honey sweetness and big time toffee. Caramel and brown sugar. Finish: A heavy hit of mocha right out of the gate. Almond and walnut. Apple, pear, and apricot. Toffee and vanilla. Cinnamon clove, and nutmeg. Moderate length. This is definitely the winner of the bunch. The first entry in the Tale series that really has me excited for the next one. The Vanillin cask is a very interesting touch here and added an incredibly rich and deep profile. This was absolutely worth the price of admission. Even at $100–which is quite a bit of an NAS. I’m looking to get another and I would highly recommend getting one of if you can still find it. It’s high quality and it offers a touch that you really won’t find anywhere else. 4.25/5.

I clocked my review of the Rendezvous Rye a few months back, so it’s great to get this one in while that’s still relatively fresh in my mind. Batch: 21D06. Pre-rebrand. Nose: Black licorice. Dill. Gala apple. Black pepper, clove, allspice, and nutmeg. Vanilla and toffee. Cotton candy. Spearmint. Palate: Cinnamon Apple Jack’s. Peach tea. Cotton candy. Honey, toffee, and vanilla. Rye spice. Black pepper, clove, and nutmeg. A touch of orange citrus. Cocoa. Finish: Gala apple. Cinnamon Apple Jack’s. Vanilla, toffee, and honey. Cocoa. Rye spice, cinnamon, black pepper, clove, and nutmeg. Moderate to short in length. This is a perfectly enjoyable sipper. The profile is pleasant and balanced and there isn’t one negative note to be detected here. However, this is missing the power and the flair that the Rendezvous Rye offers. The notes don’t jump out of the glass and you’ve got to work hard to adequately describe this. It’s surprisingly meek for a 46% ABV whiskey. Still, at $35, this quite easily hits its mark in terms of VFM. That’s about as cheap as I can find a true sipper these days, and although I’m not blown out of the water by this one, I can still appreciate a great deal for a fine whiskey—which contributes to the overall score here. 3.5/5.

This is an interesting blend of a rye and bourbon. I generally like what I’ve tried from WW so I’m looking forward to a more unique expression from these guys. Let’s check it out. Nose: Black pepper. Baked apple. Brown sugar. Toasted almond. Pistachio. Ginger snaps. Clove, nutmeg, and oak. Cream soda. Wintergreen. Newspaper. Sugar cookie and vanilla frosting. Palate: Caramel and brown sugar. Ginger snaps. Pistachio. Apple. Vanilla. Dried apricot and raisin. The red grape I get from every WW. Newspaper. Hazelnut and pecan. Finish: Cranberry, raisin, and dried apricot. Red grape. Newspaper. Cinnamon red hots hit in waves. Black pepper, clove, nutmeg, and plenty of oak. Toasted almond and macadamia. Long finish. This is a fun experiment from a distillery primarily known for its wheated bourbon. This is a unique profile, but the Wyoming Whiskey character definitely shines through. It’s not a ground-breaking whiskey, but it’s unique, and it’s quality. At $52, this is a solid value. Sitting at a strong 50%, and delivering a unique blend of standard rye notes, with heavy nut and dried fruit influence, this is a worthy effort from WW. I’ll buy one more if I can still find it. 4/5.

One of my all-time favorite whisky lines. This one is aged in refill casks and PX/Olorosso casks. It’s essentially a younger version of the Distiller’s Edition on steroids—with a couple added elements. Nose: Sea salt and brine. Coastal peat notes. Seaweed and iodine. Tennis ball. Black pepper. Lemon citrus. Pencil shavings. Vanilla wafer. Floral. Some grapefruit. A bit of soapiness. Palate: Vanilla custard. Sea salt and brine. Saltwater taffy. Salted caramel. Campfire smoke and ash. Big-time oyster. Toasted almond. Cinnamon. Rich milk chocolate. Sugar cookie. Graham cracker. Plum and red grape. Bandaid. Finish: Cinnamon, clove, nutmeg. Some hay. Hazelnut. Bandaid. Baking soda. Clove, nutmeg, and white pepper. Sea salt. Black pepper and oak. Cola. This is another awesome addition in a long line of Lag 12s. Not my favorite, but objectively a great whisky. It’s a fruity affair compared to its predecessors, but that’s to be excepted to with the cask selection. At $160, these are starting to get expensive, but it’s worth it. It offers a great profile that packs a hell of a punch. Well done, Lag. 4.5/5.

If memory serves me right, this was the second sipper rye I ever purchased. It’s been too long since I’ve had one of these—my last bottle before this predates my review-writing days. It’s a foundational whiskey in my journey and one that got me into the rye genre—it’s about time I get around to a formal review. Nose: Vanilla and pistachio. Rye spice. Brown sugar. Toasted almond. Plenty of clove, nutmeg and black pepper. Leather. A touch of lemon citrus. Cotton candy and bubblegum. Irish soda bread. Palate: More of rather vanilla and pistachio. Dill. Black licorice. Big time Cinnamon Apple Jack’s note. Irish soda bread. Caramel. Cacao, pecan, almond, walnut. More of the black pepper and lemon citrus. Clove, nutmeg, and oak. Finish: Gala Apple, vanilla, and caramel. Black pepper and some cocoa. Cinnamon, clove, and nutmeg. Pistachio. Dill. Plenty of oak. Lemon citrus. Irish soda bread. Moderate length. This is as good as I remember. It’s a great introductory rye but can keep an experienced sipper entertained. It’s a fairly standard rye profile, beautifully executed. Personally, this edges out the bourbon for my favorite entry-level Michter’s expression—which is an excellent core range. As far as value goes, this hits the mark. At $48, this is well worth the price of admission. It’s a very modest increase from a paid almost a decade ago, almost $1/yr exactly, which is very meaningful when you’re talking value. I’ve got this at a 3.75 boosted to 4/5 with consideration to VFM. Great stuff.

Balcones has been on my list for a long time. There wasn’t any particular expression that was a greater priority than the rest—I just like the bottles and found it to be an intriguing. Took almost a decade after discovering them to actually get a bottle, but we can’t just buy everything that we see, can we? Looking forward to this one,and, in doing so, I’m reviewing my first Texas whiskey as well. Let’s check it out. Nose: A little sickly sweet out of the gate. Beyond that is a nice mint chocolate note—as well as rich dark chocolate. Cranberry/craisin and dried apricot. Flax seed. Root beer. Almond, macadamia, and hazelnut. Sugar cookie. Clove and nutmeg. White pepper. Palate: The mint and dark chocolate combo is strong here as well, along with vanilla and caramel. Raspberry Valentine’s chocolate as well. Black licorice and salt water taffy. Brown sugar. Almond and pecan. Plenty of oak. Ginger snap. Cornbread. Finish: Heavy flaxseed. Dried apricot. Raspberry Valentine’s chocolate again. Brown sugar and caramel. Cinnamon, clove, nutmeg, and oak. Cornbread. Heavy cinnamon, white pepper, oak. Moderate-long finish. I really didn’t enjoy this one all too much on the first couple tastings. And now that I’ve given it some time to go through oxidation and really dug into it, I think this is awesome. It really opened up, and until I try some more Texas-based—or maybe other Western states—distillery—I really couldn’t compare this to anything else. Looking back over these notes, this really is an eclectic profile. Dry, dark, and oak-driven. And notes are just notes. One whiskey with the same notes an another may be infinitely more interesting than another—this leans toward the former. It’s a profile that isn’t inherently compelling, but everything comes together extremely nicely with this one. At $39, this was an absolute steal. A 100-proof, quality heavy hitter shy of $40? These are absolute rarity today. This is a phenomenal effort from Balcones. I need to start doing some research because I’m definitely getting another bottle from these guys. 4.5/5 after VFM boost.

5 years ago I probably wouldn’t have hesitated to call Jim Beam the premier bang for buck distillery in the US. There were a couple other contenders even then, but I think the variety of options and the cost of entry stood out most with JB. Their quality hasn’t declined in my opinion, but the prices have jumped. Enter Wild Turkey. It’s one of the other contenders I had considered at the time, and probably the only one on that short list that has seen only a modest price hike in that time. So what better way to herald the era of the new US VFM king than to try to finally review its most budget-friendly offering of all? This is the old label pictured, meaning it’s a slightly older bottling at the time I’m writing this. Nose: Heavy on the ginger and peppercorn. Black pepper and pipe smoke. Sawdust. Cocoa. Vanilla and orange citrus. Gala apple. Caramel and brown sugar. Palate: There’s some ginger, but more muted than on the nose. A bit of orange citrus. Vanilla and toffee. Cinnamon, black pepper, clove, and nutmeg. Gala apple and raisin. Apricot. Some dill and rye spice. Finish: More ginger and peppercorn. Gala apple and caramel. Clove, nutmeg, cinnamon, and black pepper. Dill and rye spice. Some apricot and peach. Moderate to short length. Wild Turkey 101 is probably the closest expression to this one across the board in terms of comparability. I must admit, as the internet experts will tell, that is clearly the superior budget option here. But this is fine. Relatively innocuous but also a lot less memorable than its higher-proof counterpart. There is a direct correlation there. This bottle cost a mere $24. It’s one of the cheapest you can find that makes for an acceptable supper. The VFM is there—by a mile. It’s a 3.25 boosted to a 3.5 for VFM. That is pretty damn good for a bottom shelf offering. Hats off the value king, WT.

I was pleasantly surprised by the Dewars 12. It was a substantially better experience than the White Label for a very minimal price bump. I jumped over the 15 for this one—for no reason at all. It’s a odd that I would skip and I’m not sure what my rationale was when I purchased this. But smoke ‘em if you got ‘em. Nose: Butterscotch, honey, toffee, and vanilla. Pear and apricot. Golden raisin. Some of the soapy notes I often get in blends. Sugar cookie. Almond and walnut. Cinnamon and white pepper. Palate: Apple, pear, golden raisin raisin, and a heavy apricot note. Heaps of cereal grain. Some milk chocolate, vanilla, and toffee. Almond is prominent, along with walnut. Honey. Coconut flakes. Butterscotch in heaps. Apple cider. Sugar cookie. Finish: Apple, pear, apricot. Golden raisin and some green grape. A bit of apple cider. Light cinnamon and white pepper. Moderate to short length. We’re not re-inventing the wheel. This is an amazingly easy-drinker. It’s the oldest blend I’ve reviewed to date, and the pronounced rough edges I get from blended Scotch are blunted to the point that they present as notes as opposed to the crux of the profile. You just get a subtle reminder from time to time that it’s a blend. But it’s really quite pleasant. At the same time, it isn’t all that interesting. There were plenty of notes, and I’m not calling it non-descript, but it’s definitely generic and walks a well-traveled path. At $75, it’s still a hell of a volume for the significant age statement. The 40% ABV is what kills it here. I understand that this is budget juice, but if you’re going to through the trouble of aging it for almost two decades, what is a slight kick in ABV really going to do to their bottom line? Probably more than Bacardi would stand to lose, but even a slight increase would allow this to develop into something a little more impactful. 3.25/5.

So this is essentially an 8-year from Calumet after their rebrand. Not too sure what to expect, but it’s my first go at the revamped line. Lets check it out. Nose: Caramel and honey. Butterscotch and brown sugar. Flinstone vitamins. Almond. Raisin. Cola. Cinnamon AppleJacks. Welsh’s White Grape Juice. Nutmeg, clove, and black pepper. Some background rye, cocoa, black tea. Palate: Caramel, vanilla, and nougat. Toffee. Heavy on corn. Some of those chalky, vitamin notes. Huge butterscotch and brown sugar notes. Some sawdust and a tingle of rye spice. Finish: Pistacchio and oak. Wintergreen. Mint chocolate. Raisin, fig, date. Cinnamon Apple Jack’s. Caramel and vanilla. Light heat and oak. Moderate-short. I’ve never really seen a distillery actively advertise two separate age statements as prominently as this. Sure, I’ve had some Little Book batches where the 6-part component breakdown includes all of the individual ages, but never one like this, where they really leave up to your imagination with so little context. My verdict? I’d say the 8 is more heavily represented despite not getting top-billing on the label. Not that this tastes overtly green. 8 years is actually a respectable age statement for a bourbon—you’ll often see lower numbers boasted about on the label. This initially feels like a corn dominant bourbon, but the rye pokes its way in there from time to time in the form of these spicy and cocoa notes. It’s by no means revolutionary but it embodies a classic bourbon profile, done quite well here, and offers solid value, especially considering its age statement(s.) 3.75/5.