1901
Bunnahabhain 12 Year
Single Malt — Islay, Scotland
Reviewed
October 17, 2020 (edited April 29, 2021)
Nose: nut, sherry trifle, raisin, blackberry, new leather, light brine and oak
Palate: sherry, vanilla, dark berry
Finish: long, sweet, lightly salty and a bit too tannic
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Last 16, Match 8:
Bunnahabhain 12yo versus Speyburn 10yo
I thought it had a shy nose, but was richer than the Speyburn. They are very different and I preferred the Speyburn’s cleaner, lighter perfume this evening. The same applies for the palate and finish. The Bunna is one to savour with a velvet mouthfeel and a warming rich sherried palate. It’s a very good whiskey but the Speyburn is airier and more pleasing on this occasion.
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
The intolerable torment of a whiskyphile. I have too large a backlog of samples and miniatures to go through. Selecting a dram can make my head spin like Linda Blair. So, I developed a plan so clever you could put a tail on it and call it a fox. I have picked sixteen scotch whiskies that are 12yrs or younger or NAS to battle it out in a Scotch Deathmatch. It’s my incentive to lighten the logjam. Follow along if you care (and really why should you?). Oh the drama!
https://challonge.com/ScotchMadness
Create Account
or
Sign in
to comment on this review
@Slainte-Mhath yeah bit on an anomaly,that one. In the next round, which Speyburn lost, i questioned whether i made the right call on it. Still like the Speyburn though.
@1901 You preferred Speyburn 10 over Bunnahabhain 12? Now that's a rare find.