Tastes

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2023 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A123 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B523 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C923 Continuing to work through ECBPs in my collection. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; my only complete years for all three releases are 2017 and 2023. I’ve previously reviewed the ECBP A123 in a showdown with its Heaven Hill cousin, Larceny Barrel Proof A123 (October 11, 2023); but I’ve yet to review all three 2023 releases in “Showdown” format. In 2017, Elijah Craig introduced a new bottle and label. For the A117 release to the A123, the label at the bottom had three boxes: one for proof, one for ABV, and one for batch (i.e., A123). Each bottle carried a 12-year age statement. This changed with the B523 release, and thus far continues with the C923. These labels continue to show the proof in the first box, but the second box now shows the age statement, which is no longer only 12 years. The B523 is 11 years and 5 months; the C923 is 13 years and 7 months. I’ve gone through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and averaged the 21 averages themselves to establish a community mean for the seven-year period 2017-2023. This will enable us to quantify what the group things about a particular release relative to the overall average (mean). As of roughly a week ago: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 standard deviation is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% of the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A123 Like each of these 2023 releases, the A123 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. caramelized sugar, root beer, pineapple upside down cake, barbecue sauce, caramel, maple syrup, chocolate pudding pie, and vanilla. There is a faint vegetal note like celery seed, but this only makes it more interesting. The amazing depth and breadth on the nose doesn’t miss a step on the palate, which is sweet and spicy. Some drying leather and lots of vanilla on the long finish. When I did a Showdown between the ECBP A123 and the Larceny Barrel Proof A123, I rated the ECBP 4.25 vs the LBP at 4.5. If that was accurate, I can’t wait to taste the LBP A123 again! Th ECBP A123 is very, very good. Would I buy it again? Yes. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof is the best value in all of bourbondom. And it’s not that $80 is “cheap”; rather, it is inexpensive relative to bourbon-price insanity, and represents amazing value in its combination of price, flavor, and proof. Easy 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.42, z=1.13, n=49 (well above all ECBPs) 125.6 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B523 Like each of these 2023 releases, the B523 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. Muted nose compared to the A123 (although it does open up after 15+ minutes). Cocoa, pecan pie, marzipan, deep sandalwood, and a dusty dry leather note. It becomes much more assertive on the palate, with cola syrup and a deep honeyed sweetness, and the 124.2 proof (the lightest of the bunch) makes an appearance. That same assertiveness continues on the finish, with the dusty dry leather note making a second appearance, along with some slight bitterness and a hit of vanilla. As of last week, the Distiller community has ranked the B523 at 4.47, second only to the C523’s 4.49. I can’t agree with that. The nose is a wallflower compared to its A123 and C923 siblings, and that same nose is incongruous with its own palate as well. To be fair, these are high-class problems, manifest from high expectations. Would I buy it again? Yes. Of course I would. I’ve never been disappointed with any release of Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, and the fact that they can be found at $80 is just incredible. 4.25 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.47, z=1.49, n=69 (well above than all ECBPs) 124.2 proof. 11-year, 5-month age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C923 Like each of these 2023 releases, the C923 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. Effusive, penetrating nose shows banana bread, brown sugar, rich apple pie, caramel, sweet and sour sauce, the same very light celery-seed note that I got on the A123, and a cooling hint of licorice. On the palate, the flavors coat the tongue, and the robust flavor intensity keeps the high 133 proof in check. Toasted marshmallow—including some that you let catch on fire and get a little burnt—on the finish, along with a little root beer and vanilla. Wow. Transcendent. ECBP C923 is on another level. Insofar that I can recall, this is my favorite release of ECBP. This bourbon can be found for $79.99, which is the best bourbon value I’ve ever come across (the A123 is not too far behind). Would I buy it again? Yes. Please, if you see any at retail, leave a comment below and I’ll be there ASAP. 4.75 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.75 Community: m=4.49, z=1.64, n=69 (significantly better than all ECBPs) 133.0 proof. 13-year, 7-month age statement. Overall, the B523 is the softest of the bunch, and was the easiest of the three to rank. It has the lowest age statement, and the lowest proof (just slightly lower than the A123). But that’s not a ding; it is very good. “Softest” is relative to the other two, and tasted alone, that same descriptor could come across as “smooth.” But the nose is AWOL in comparison. The A123 and C923, however, are on a different level, with robust aromatics and flavors from start to finish. As I’ve stated before, these “Showdown” formats aren’t necessarily meant to declare winners and losers, but rather to establish some context amongst various themes. For the 2023 releases of ECBP, however, there is a clear hierarchy: C923, closely followed by A123, and then B523. I’d happily drink the B523 neat and enjoy every sip. And to be clear, I’m not influenced by the fact that the May release is somewhat lower (11 years, 5 months) than ECBP’s typical 12-year age statement. It simply lacks the unbelievable intensity of the January and September 2023 releases. At some point down the road, I’ll do a Showdown between the ECBP B523 and the Larceny Barrel Proof B523; perhaps the ECBP will show differently against that backdrop. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2023 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A123 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B523 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C923 Continuing to work through ECBPs in my collection. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; my only complete years for all three releases are 2017 and 2023. I’ve previously reviewed the ECBP A123 in a showdown with its Heaven Hill cousin, Larceny Barrel Proof A123 (October 11, 2023); but I’ve yet to review all three 2023 releases in “Showdown” format. In 2017, Elijah Craig introduced a new bottle and label. For the A117 release to the A123, the label at the bottom had three boxes: one for proof, one for ABV, and one for batch (i.e., A123). Each bottle carried a 12-year age statement. This changed with the B523 release, and thus far continues with the C923. These labels continue to show the proof in the first box, but the second box now shows the age statement, which is no longer only 12 years. The B523 is 11 years and 5 months; the C923 is 13 years and 7 months. I’ve gone through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and averaged the 21 averages themselves to establish a community mean for the seven-year period 2017-2023. This will enable us to quantify what the group things about a particular release relative to the overall average (mean). As of roughly a week ago: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 standard deviation is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% of the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A123 Like each of these 2023 releases, the A123 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. caramelized sugar, root beer, pineapple upside down cake, barbecue sauce, caramel, maple syrup, chocolate pudding pie, and vanilla. There is a faint vegetal note like celery seed, but this only makes it more interesting. The amazing depth and breadth on the nose doesn’t miss a step on the palate, which is sweet and spicy. Some drying leather and lots of vanilla on the long finish. When I did a Showdown between the ECBP A123 and the Larceny Barrel Proof A123, I rated the ECBP 4.25 vs the LBP at 4.5. If that was accurate, I can’t wait to taste the LBP A123 again! Th ECBP A123 is very, very good. Would I buy it again? Yes. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof is the best value in all of bourbondom. And it’s not that $80 is “cheap”; rather, it is inexpensive relative to bourbon-price insanity, and represents amazing value in its combination of price, flavor, and proof. Easy 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.42, z=1.13, n=49 (well above all ECBPs) 125.6 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B523 Like each of these 2023 releases, the B523 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. Muted nose compared to the A123 (although it does open up after 15+ minutes). Cocoa, pecan pie, marzipan, deep sandalwood, and a dusty dry leather note. It becomes much more assertive on the palate, with cola syrup and a deep honeyed sweetness, and the 124.2 proof (the lightest of the bunch) makes an appearance. That same assertiveness continues on the finish, with the dusty dry leather note making a second appearance, along with some slight bitterness and a hit of vanilla. As of last week, the Distiller community has ranked the B523 at 4.47, second only to the C523’s 4.49. I can’t agree with that. The nose is a wallflower compared to its A123 and C923 siblings, and that same nose is incongruous with its own palate as well. To be fair, these are high-class problems, manifest from high expectations. Would I buy it again? Yes. Of course I would. I’ve never been disappointed with any release of Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, and the fact that they can be found at $80 is just incredible. 4.25 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.47, z=1.49, n=69 (well above than all ECBPs) 124.2 proof. 11-year, 5-month age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C923 Like each of these 2023 releases, the C923 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. Effusive, penetrating nose shows banana bread, brown sugar, rich apple pie, caramel, sweet and sour sauce, the same very light celery-seed note that I got on the A123, and a cooling hint of licorice. On the palate, the flavors coat the tongue, and the robust flavor intensity keeps the high 133 proof in check. Toasted marshmallow—including some that you let catch on fire and get a little burnt—on the finish, along with a little root beer and vanilla. Wow. Transcendent. ECBP C923 is on another level. Insofar that I can recall, this is my favorite release of ECBP. This bourbon can be found for $79.99, which is the best bourbon value I’ve ever come across (the A123 is not too far behind). Would I buy it again? Yes. Please, if you see any at retail, leave a comment below and I’ll be there ASAP. 4.75 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.75 Community: m=4.49, z=1.64, n=69 (significantly better than all ECBPs) 133.0 proof. 13-year, 7-month age statement. Overall, the B523 is the softest of the bunch, and was the easiest of the three to rank. It has the lowest age statement, and the lowest proof (just slightly lower than the A123). But that’s not a ding; it is very good. “Softest” is relative to the other two, and tasted alone, that same descriptor could come across as “smooth.” But the nose is AWOL in comparison. The A123 and C923, however, are on a different level, with robust aromatics and flavors from start to finish. As I’ve stated before, these “Showdown” formats aren’t necessarily meant to declare winners and losers, but rather to establish some context amongst various themes. For the 2023 releases of ECBP, however, there is a clear hierarchy: C923, closely followed by A123, and then B523. I’d happily drink the B523 neat and enjoy every sip. And to be clear, I’m not influenced by the fact that the May release is somewhat lower (11 years, 5 months) than ECBP’s typical 12-year age statement. It simply lacks the unbelievable intensity of the January and September 2023 releases. At some point down the road, I’ll do a Showdown between the ECBP B523 and the Larceny Barrel Proof B523; perhaps the ECBP will show differently against that backdrop. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2023 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A123 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B523 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C923 Continuing to work through ECBPs in my collection. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; my only complete years for all three releases are 2017 and 2023. I’ve previously reviewed the ECBP A123 in a showdown with its Heaven Hill cousin, Larceny Barrel Proof A123 (October 11, 2023); but I’ve yet to review all three 2023 releases in “Showdown” format. In 2017, Elijah Craig introduced a new bottle and label. For the A117 release to the A123, the label at the bottom had three boxes: one for proof, one for ABV, and one for batch (i.e., A123). Each bottle carried a 12-year age statement. This changed with the B523 release, and thus far continues with the C923. These labels continue to show the proof in the first box, but the second box now shows the age statement, which is no longer only 12 years. The B523 is 11 years and 5 months; the C923 is 13 years and 7 months. I’ve gone through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and averaged the 21 averages themselves to establish a community mean for the seven-year period 2017-2023. This will enable us to quantify what the group things about a particular release relative to the overall average (mean). As of roughly a week ago: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 standard deviation is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% of the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A123 Like each of these 2023 releases, the A123 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. caramelized sugar, root beer, pineapple upside down cake, barbecue sauce, caramel, maple syrup, chocolate pudding pie, and vanilla. There is a faint vegetal note like celery seed, but this only makes it more interesting. The amazing depth and breadth on the nose doesn’t miss a step on the palate, which is sweet and spicy. Some drying leather and lots of vanilla on the long finish. When I did a Showdown between the ECBP A123 and the Larceny Barrel Proof A123, I rated the ECBP 4.25 vs the LBP at 4.5. If that was accurate, I can’t wait to taste the LBP A123 again! Th ECBP A123 is very, very good. Would I buy it again? Yes. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof is the best value in all of bourbondom. And it’s not that $80 is “cheap”; rather, it is inexpensive relative to bourbon-price insanity, and represents amazing value in its combination of price, flavor, and proof. Easy 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.42, z=1.13, n=49 (well above all ECBPs) 125.6 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B523 Like each of these 2023 releases, the B523 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. Muted nose compared to the A123 (although it does open up after 15+ minutes). Cocoa, pecan pie, marzipan, deep sandalwood, and a dusty dry leather note. It becomes much more assertive on the palate, with cola syrup and a deep honeyed sweetness, and the 124.2 proof (the lightest of the bunch) makes an appearance. That same assertiveness continues on the finish, with the dusty dry leather note making a second appearance, along with some slight bitterness and a hit of vanilla. As of last week, the Distiller community has ranked the B523 at 4.47, second only to the C523’s 4.49. I can’t agree with that. The nose is a wallflower compared to its A123 and C923 siblings, and that same nose is incongruous with its own palate as well. To be fair, these are high-class problems, manifest from high expectations. Would I buy it again? Yes. Of course I would. I’ve never been disappointed with any release of Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, and the fact that they can be found at $80 is just incredible. 4.25 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.47, z=1.49, n=69 (well above than all ECBPs) 124.2 proof. 11-year, 5-month age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C923 Like each of these 2023 releases, the C923 color is a clear mahogany, like Pantone 159. Effusive, penetrating nose shows banana bread, brown sugar, rich apple pie, caramel, sweet and sour sauce, the same very light celery-seed note that I got on the A123, and a cooling hint of licorice. On the palate, the flavors coat the tongue, and the robust flavor intensity keeps the high 133 proof in check. Toasted marshmallow—including some that you let catch on fire and get a little burnt—on the finish, along with a little root beer and vanilla. Wow. Transcendent. ECBP C923 is on another level. Insofar that I can recall, this is my favorite release of ECBP. This bourbon can be found for $79.99, which is the best bourbon value I’ve ever come across (the A123 is not too far behind). Would I buy it again? Yes. Please, if you see any at retail, leave a comment below and I’ll be there ASAP. 4.75 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.75 Community: m=4.49, z=1.64, n=69 (significantly better than all ECBPs) 133.0 proof. 13-year, 7-month age statement. Overall, the B523 is the softest of the bunch, and was the easiest of the three to rank. It has the lowest age statement, and the lowest proof (just slightly lower than the A123). But that’s not a ding; it is very good. “Softest” is relative to the other two, and tasted alone, that same descriptor could come across as “smooth.” But the nose is AWOL in comparison. The A123 and C923, however, are on a different level, with robust aromatics and flavors from start to finish. As I’ve stated before, these “Showdown” formats aren’t necessarily meant to declare winners and losers, but rather to establish some context amongst various themes. For the 2023 releases of ECBP, however, there is a clear hierarchy: C923, closely followed by A123, and then B523. I’d happily drink the B523 neat and enjoy every sip. And to be clear, I’m not influenced by the fact that the May release is somewhat lower (11 years, 5 months) than ECBP’s typical 12-year age statement. It simply lacks the unbelievable intensity of the January and September 2023 releases. At some point down the road, I’ll do a Showdown between the ECBP B523 and the Larceny Barrel Proof B523; perhaps the ECBP will show differently against that backdrop. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2021 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A121 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B521 Continuing to work through whiskies in my collection that I’ve yet to review. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; however, my only complete year for all three releases is 2017. For 2021, I was never able to find C921, so this showdown will compare the A121 to the B521. I’ve gone through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and averaged the 21 averages themselves to establish a community mean for the seven-year period 2017-2023. This will enable us to quantify what the group things about a particular release relative to the overall average (mean). At the time of yesterday’s review: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 standard deviation is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% of the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A121 The A121 presents as a deep, dark amber, much like Pantone 152. Effusive nose shows toasted oak, peanut brittle (this later after going back and forth between the two), cherries, pomander (both the dried orange and clove components), some corn pudding, vanilla, and a little anise at the end. The palate is wonderfully sweet and the alcohol is quickly noticeable on the back end, bringing some spice. Charred oak, just a smidgen of tannic bitterness, and nice vanilla on the finish. Caveat lector: I’m a huge ECBP fan, and I’m certainly not alone there. Where else are you going to find rich, bold flavors at 125-ish proof for $75? Larceny Barrel Proof (another Heaven Hill product) is getting there (it’s actually a little cheaper). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof has no competition in this space. Would I buy it again? Yes. Over the course of half an hour, the A121 just kept getting better and better. It’s amazing. 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.24, z=-0.16, n=239 (marginally worse than all ECBPs) 123.6 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B521 Like the A121, the B521 is a clear version of Pantone 152. Nose exhibits crème brûlée, toasted oak, clove, apple cider, and a little bit of a dusty element. Palate is sweeter than the nose, with chocolate-covered cherries. I even thought I got a touch of pineapple, with some coconut: not quite a piña colada, but coconut is not uncommon from oak. . The alcohol seems a little more integrated (to be fair, it is 4.6 proof points lower than the A121), but teh spice is there. Roasted marshmallow, a little oak, and a long pull of vanilla on the finish. This is beginning to sound like a broken record: complex nose, rich and robust flavors, barrel-proof strength, and $75. Would I buy it again? Yes. Every time. 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.15, z=-0.81, n=190 (moderately worse than all ECBPs) 118.2 proof. 12-year age statement. Both of these ECBP releases have without-a-doubt bourbon profiles, with the volume pushing full blast. They’re not perfect exemplars—my benchmarks are the 2019 William Larue Weller and George T. Stagg for higher proofs—and these fall short of that smoothness and the warm, enveloping, even soothing experiences that those bourbons provide. While I’ve listed some different descriptors—which are subjective and often times overlap and are not explicitly distinct—the two releases are more similar than they are different, and consistent with typical ECBP offerings. I rate them higher than the Distiller community. How many bourbons are that much better? Not many. I’ll happily savor these neat: like all ECBP releases, they offer both hedonistic and intellectual pleasure. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2021 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A121 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B521 Continuing to work through whiskies in my collection that I’ve yet to review. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; however, my only complete year for all three releases is 2017. For 2021, I was never able to find C921, so this showdown will compare the A121 to the B521. I’ve gone through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and averaged the 21 averages themselves to establish a community mean for the seven-year period 2017-2023. This will enable us to quantify what the group things about a particular release relative to the overall average (mean). At the time of yesterday’s review: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 standard deviation is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% of the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A121 The A121 presents as a deep, dark amber, much like Pantone 152. Effusive nose shows toasted oak, peanut brittle (this later after going back and forth between the two), cherries, pomander (both the dried orange and clove components), some corn pudding, vanilla, and a little anise at the end. The palate is wonderfully sweet and the alcohol is quickly noticeable on the back end, bringing some spice. Charred oak, just a smidgen of tannic bitterness, and nice vanilla on the finish. Caveat lector: I’m a huge ECBP fan, and I’m certainly not alone there. Where else are you going to find rich, bold flavors at 125-ish proof for $75? Larceny Barrel Proof (another Heaven Hill product) is getting there (it’s actually a little cheaper). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof has no competition in this space. Would I buy it again? Yes. Over the course of half an hour, the A121 just kept getting better and better. It’s amazing. 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.24, z=-0.16, n=239 (marginally worse than all ECBPs) 123.6 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B521 Like the A121, the B521 is a clear version of Pantone 152. Nose exhibits crème brûlée, toasted oak, clove, apple cider, and a little bit of a dusty element. Palate is sweeter than the nose, with chocolate-covered cherries. I even thought I got a touch of pineapple, with some coconut: not quite a piña colada, but coconut is not uncommon from oak. . The alcohol seems a little more integrated (to be fair, it is 4.6 proof points lower than the A121), but teh spice is there. Roasted marshmallow, a little oak, and a long pull of vanilla on the finish. This is beginning to sound like a broken record: complex nose, rich and robust flavors, barrel-proof strength, and $75. Would I buy it again? Yes. Every time. 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.15, z=-0.81, n=190 (moderately worse than all ECBPs) 118.2 proof. 12-year age statement. Both of these ECBP releases have without-a-doubt bourbon profiles, with the volume pushing full blast. They’re not perfect exemplars—my benchmarks are the 2019 William Larue Weller and George T. Stagg for higher proofs—and these fall short of that smoothness and the warm, enveloping, even soothing experiences that those bourbons provide. While I’ve listed some different descriptors—which are subjective and often times overlap and are not explicitly distinct—the two releases are more similar than they are different, and consistent with typical ECBP offerings. I rate them higher than the Distiller community. How many bourbons are that much better? Not many. I’ll happily savor these neat: like all ECBP releases, they offer both hedonistic and intellectual pleasure. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2019 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A119 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B519 Continuing to work through whiskies in my collection that I’ve yet to review. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; however, my only complete year for all three releases is 2017. For 2019, I was never able to find C919, so this showdown will compare the A119 to the B519. I’ve gone through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and averaged the 21 averages themselves to establish a community mean for the seven-year period 2017-2023. This will enable us to quantify what the group things about a particular release relative to the overall average (mean). At the time of yesterday’s review: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 standard deviation is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% of the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A119 Color is a clear russet mahogany, consistent with Pantone 153. Prominent cherries on the nose, orange marmalade, caramel apples, oaky vanilla, and noticeable alcohol. Just the slightest bit of creaminess on the palate, with caramelized sugar and spicy cinnamon with the alcohol kick, finishing with some tobacco, leather, toasted oak, and lots of vanilla on the medium-long finish. For $75-80, the age statement, barrel proof, and consistent good- to-great quality of ECBP makes this bourbon a no-brainer. Unfortunately, they get scarce pretty quickly, and I’m typically not able to secure all three releases for any given year—though I definitely try. ECBP always represents a great value. This particular batch is very good: complex, robust, and approaching hazmat proof, which doesn’t overwhelm the depth and richness of flavor. Give me a campfire in the woods on a cool fall evening, and this (and a good woman). 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.36, z=0.70, n=270 (moderately better than all ECBPs) 135.2 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B519 Bourbonesque clear mahogany (Pantone 153) is indistinguishable in color from the A119. Nose begins with a soft cocoa powder followed by fruity cherries, grilled peaches, and strawberry preserves, and a whiff of cool licorice. The palate has a little sweetness, quickly revealing some espresso bitterness, woody tannins, char, roasted marshmallow, and burnt caramel, before fading to vanilla. Tasted after the A119, the B519’s lower proof is evident: this is a kinder, gentler ECBP. “Gentler,” but not “gentle.” It’s softer than the A119, but has the gusto to wear the ECBP banner proudly. While the community rates this as slightly below all ECBPs over the past seven years, I’d rate it just slightly above, but given the quarter-point increments of the Distiller rating system, there’s not enough to push it to a 4.5 like the A119. Great value as always. Would I buy it again? Yes. I buy every ECBP release that I see. 4.25 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.23, z=-0.23, n=305 (slightly worse than all ECBPs) 122.2 proof. 12-year age statement. For the most part, comparing ECBPs is like comparing BMWs with Mercedes, or critiquing any luxury car brand and debating the merits of different options. These tasting “Showdowns” are fun to do, and I believe are good exercises for your nose and palate. Finding the good stuff requires wading through a lot of crap. I’ve waded through a lot of crap already, and am sure that ECBP is among the good stuff. Overall, the A119 is more complex and assertive, whereas the B519 is softer (and still complex). Both are perched near the top of the bourbon world. The A119 appeals a bit more to my palate than the B519, but I will continue to happily drink them both. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2019 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A119 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B519 Continuing to work through whiskies in my collection that I’ve yet to review. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; however, my only complete year for all three releases is 2017. For 2019, I was never able to find C919, so this showdown will compare the A119 to the B519. I’ve gone through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and averaged the 21 averages themselves to establish a community mean for the seven-year period 2017-2023. This will enable us to quantify what the group things about a particular release relative to the overall average (mean). At the time of yesterday’s review: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 standard deviation is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% of the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). Elijah Craig Barrel Proof A119 Color is a clear russet mahogany, consistent with Pantone 153. Prominent cherries on the nose, orange marmalade, caramel apples, oaky vanilla, and noticeable alcohol. Just the slightest bit of creaminess on the palate, with caramelized sugar and spicy cinnamon with the alcohol kick, finishing with some tobacco, leather, toasted oak, and lots of vanilla on the medium-long finish. For $75-80, the age statement, barrel proof, and consistent good- to-great quality of ECBP makes this bourbon a no-brainer. Unfortunately, they get scarce pretty quickly, and I’m typically not able to secure all three releases for any given year—though I definitely try. ECBP always represents a great value. This particular batch is very good: complex, robust, and approaching hazmat proof, which doesn’t overwhelm the depth and richness of flavor. Give me a campfire in the woods on a cool fall evening, and this (and a good woman). 4.5 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.5 Community: m=4.36, z=0.70, n=270 (moderately better than all ECBPs) 135.2 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B519 Bourbonesque clear mahogany (Pantone 153) is indistinguishable in color from the A119. Nose begins with a soft cocoa powder followed by fruity cherries, grilled peaches, and strawberry preserves, and a whiff of cool licorice. The palate has a little sweetness, quickly revealing some espresso bitterness, woody tannins, char, roasted marshmallow, and burnt caramel, before fading to vanilla. Tasted after the A119, the B519’s lower proof is evident: this is a kinder, gentler ECBP. “Gentler,” but not “gentle.” It’s softer than the A119, but has the gusto to wear the ECBP banner proudly. While the community rates this as slightly below all ECBPs over the past seven years, I’d rate it just slightly above, but given the quarter-point increments of the Distiller rating system, there’s not enough to push it to a 4.5 like the A119. Great value as always. Would I buy it again? Yes. I buy every ECBP release that I see. 4.25 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.23, z=-0.23, n=305 (slightly worse than all ECBPs) 122.2 proof. 12-year age statement. For the most part, comparing ECBPs is like comparing BMWs with Mercedes, or critiquing any luxury car brand and debating the merits of different options. These tasting “Showdowns” are fun to do, and I believe are good exercises for your nose and palate. Finding the good stuff requires wading through a lot of crap. I’ve waded through a lot of crap already, and am sure that ECBP is among the good stuff. Overall, the A119 is more complex and assertive, whereas the B519 is softer (and still complex). Both are perched near the top of the bourbon world. The A119 appeals a bit more to my palate than the B519, but I will continue to happily drink them both. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2018 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B518 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C918 Continuing to work through whiskies in my collection that I’ve yet to review. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; however, my only complete year for all three releases is 2017. For 2018, I was never able to find that A118, so this showdown will compare the B518 to the C918. I thought it would be instructive to go through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and then quantify what the community thinks of each release relative to the whole. For the seven-year period 2017-2023, as of the time of this review, aggregating all releases of ECBP: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). For each year that I review, again for the bottles I have, I’ll do the same stats for that particular year. I’ll also attempt to go back and insert this information in other reviews I’ve done, when appropriate. So here we go. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B518 Color is a clear mahogany, with bourbon typicity much like Pantone 153. The nose is a bit sharp, and shows apple cider, cocoa, oranges, caramelized sugar, char, espresso, and a dusting of softening nutmeg. The palate is expressive, starting off sweet, followed by a barbecue sauce tang, and then the heat kicks in. Vanilla is prominent on the long finish, with roasted marshmallow making an appearance, along with some lingering char, a touch of bitterness, and additional burn. After the C918, the barbecue sauce tang that I caught on the palate is detectable on the nose, and even a little salt. Nowadays, current releases of ECBP (or previous releases still in inventory) retail for around $75. However, bottles are often marked up because of the scarcity of each release (three per year). Older bottles are even more scarce, and ostensibly would be priced accordingly. I always have my eye out for ECBP; the problem is, I’m frequently not able to find them all. Would I buy them again? Yes. There is variability among releases—they can range from merely good to fantastic—but ECBP is known for its consistency and quality, and on a value basis, $75 (if you can get it) is very good for a barrel-proof bourbon with a 12-year age statement. 4.25 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.32, z=0.41, n=81 (moderately better than all ECBPs) 133.4 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C918 Color is indistinguishable from the B518, analogous to Pantone 153. Cocoa powder, pressed sugar cane, orange oil, cinnamon stick, toasted oak, and vanilla. A little creaminess on the palate, with noticeable ethanol. The finish starts with a touch of bitterness—some woody tannins masquerading as espresso—along with some leathery dryness, and then the cocoa and vanilla from the nose appear again on the medium-length finish. All ECBPs are rich and robust, and when sipped neat, not for the faint of heart. The ECBP C918 is no exception. But it comes across as a bit softer and more mellow than the B518. This is great bourbon, period. In the humble opinion of this reviewer, the value can’t be beat—value being not just price, but what you’re getting for the price. And you’re getting an awful lot. At $75-80 retail, would I buy it again? Yes. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.27, z=0.05, n=173 (essentially dead-on average vs all ECBPs) 131.4 proof. 12-year age statement. Perhaps the best thing about doing these “Showdowns” is after spending some time individually with each one and writing some notes, I’m then able to go back and forth a bit and smell and taste additional nuances that I wouldn’t have caught otherwise. Overall, the B518 has more complexity and dimensionality than the C918. It has more presence and pervasiveness on the palate. It does carry 2 additional proof points, but at this level, that’s insignificant. Both of these are good, but not otherworldly, consistent with the overall community profile for ECBP. Initially, I had the C918 better than the B518, but after some back-and-forth, the B518 gets the nod, even though due to the quarter-point increments of the Distiller rating system, I rate them both 4.25. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

ELIJAH CRAIG BARREL PROOF SHOWDOWN: 2018 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B518 Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C918 Continuing to work through whiskies in my collection that I’ve yet to review. I’ve got several years and releases of ECBP; however, my only complete year for all three releases is 2017. For 2018, I was never able to find that A118, so this showdown will compare the B518 to the C918. I thought it would be instructive to go through seven years of community ranking data for each triannual rating of ECBP, and then quantify what the community thinks of each release relative to the whole. For the seven-year period 2017-2023, as of the time of this review, aggregating all releases of ECBP: • mean(m): 4.26 • standard deviation(s): 0.14 • sample size(n): 3008 (If you don’t care about stats, you can skip the next two paragraphs). Because I’m unable to aggregate all ratings for each specific release (Distiller, are you listening? Give us more data!), I’m unable to establish a standard deviation for a particular release. But I am able to compute the z-score for each particular release relative to the entire sample. The z-score is computed as follows: ((mean for the specific release minus the mean for the entire sample) divided by the overall sample’s standard deviation). This statistic quantifies how much better or worse a particular release is in relation to the community’s ranking of all ECBP over the sample period. Assuming a normal distribution, any z-score within +/- 1.0 is assumed to be within “normal” limits (per the empirical rule, ~68% the distribution is within +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A z-score of +/- 2 standard deviations would represent ~95% of the distribution; and +/- 3 is ~99% of the distribution. Thus a z-score of +1.5 would be a significantly better release than normal (and -1.5 would be significantly worse). A z-score of 2.0 would be better than 95% of the sample, etc. (End of stats geek stuff). For each year that I review, again for the bottles I have, I’ll do the same stats for that particular year. I’ll also attempt to go back and insert this information in other reviews I’ve done, when appropriate. So here we go. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof B518 Color is a clear mahogany, with bourbon typicity much like Pantone 153. The nose is a bit sharp, and shows apple cider, cocoa, oranges, caramelized sugar, char, espresso, and a dusting of softening nutmeg. The palate is expressive, starting off sweet, followed by a barbecue sauce tang, and then the heat kicks in. Vanilla is prominent on the long finish, with roasted marshmallow making an appearance, along with some lingering char, a touch of bitterness, and additional burn. After the C918, the barbecue sauce tang that I caught on the palate is detectable on the nose, and even a little salt. Nowadays, current releases of ECBP (or previous releases still in inventory) retail for around $75. However, bottles are often marked up because of the scarcity of each release (three per year). Older bottles are even more scarce, and ostensibly would be priced accordingly. I always have my eye out for ECBP; the problem is, I’m frequently not able to find them all. Would I buy them again? Yes. There is variability among releases—they can range from merely good to fantastic—but ECBP is known for its consistency and quality, and on a value basis, $75 (if you can get it) is very good for a barrel-proof bourbon with a 12-year age statement. 4.25 on the Distiller scale. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.32, z=0.41, n=81 (moderately better than all ECBPs) 133.4 proof. 12-year age statement. Elijah Craig Barrel Proof C918 Color is indistinguishable from the B518, analogous to Pantone 153. Cocoa powder, pressed sugar cane, orange oil, cinnamon stick, toasted oak, and vanilla. A little creaminess on the palate, with noticeable ethanol. The finish starts with a touch of bitterness—some woody tannins masquerading as espresso—along with some leathery dryness, and then the cocoa and vanilla from the nose appear again on the medium-length finish. All ECBPs are rich and robust, and when sipped neat, not for the faint of heart. The ECBP C918 is no exception. But it comes across as a bit softer and more mellow than the B518. This is great bourbon, period. In the humble opinion of this reviewer, the value can’t be beat—value being not just price, but what you’re getting for the price. And you’re getting an awful lot. At $75-80 retail, would I buy it again? Yes. My rating: 4.25 Community: m=4.27, z=0.05, n=173 (essentially dead-on average vs all ECBPs) 131.4 proof. 12-year age statement. Perhaps the best thing about doing these “Showdowns” is after spending some time individually with each one and writing some notes, I’m then able to go back and forth a bit and smell and taste additional nuances that I wouldn’t have caught otherwise. Overall, the B518 has more complexity and dimensionality than the C918. It has more presence and pervasiveness on the palate. It does carry 2 additional proof points, but at this level, that’s insignificant. Both of these are good, but not otherworldly, consistent with the overall community profile for ECBP. Initially, I had the C918 better than the B518, but after some back-and-forth, the B518 gets the nod, even though due to the quarter-point increments of the Distiller rating system, I rate them both 4.25. N.B.: All spirits tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.

KNOB CREEK SHOWDOWN Knob Creek NAS Small Batch Bourbon Knob Creek 9-Year Single Barrel Reserve Knob Creek 12-Year Small Batch Continuing to work through whiskies in my collection that I’ve yet to review. I have reviewed the 12-Year previously, but since I’d yet to review the NAS Small Batch and the 9-Year Single Barrel, I thought I’d group the three together for a side-by-side tasting. Knob Creek may be a little like the old Chevy Nova, which was spurned by Hispanic clientele because “no va” means “no go” in Spanish. I was at a bar in Manhattan a few years back with an English colleague and Knob Creek looked like a safe bet, so I ordered it. When he heard this he said “I would never order Knob Creek, mate.” While Knob Creek bourbon was named after the Knob Creek Farm in Kentucky, “Knob” in the U.K. means something else entirely. I have no idea what U.K. sales look like for this Jim Beam brand. Knob Creek NAS Small Batch Bourbon Color is a clear and bourbon-like caramel-colored Pantone 138. Nose shows sweet caramel, a little orange, and a healthy dose of oak and vanilla. The palate Knob Creek NAS Small Batch can be found for around $40. The 100-proof is not diluted to the bare minimum 80 proof, which is a good thing. But the $40 price tag is high relative to the market. I recently wrote a “BUDGET BOTTLED IN BOND BOURBON SHOWDOWN” review (September 24, 2023), and each of those three 100-proof, NAS bourbons (Evan Williams BiB, Old Tub, and Wild Turkey 101) can be had for nearly half the price. The Knob Creek NAS doesn’t differentiate itself enough from those to warrant a price nearly twice as high. There are no particular flaws; but it’s not a sipper, and while higher proof is good for cocktails, you can find far cheaper 100-proof bourbons that will perform just as well. Would I buy it again? No. 3.0 on the Distiller scale. 100 proof. NAS. Knob Creek 9-Year Single Barrel Reserve Virtually identical Pantone 138 color as the Knob Creek NAS. The nose is complex, and unsurprisingly outshines the NAS, with chocolate covered cherries, dried orange, Honey-Nut Cheerios, charred oak, vanilla, and noticeable but well-integrated alcohol, followed by a little cooling mint. The mouthfeel shows a very light creaminess and coats the tongue, and the palate shows dark caramelized sugar and bittersweet chocolate, which transitions to some light woody tannic bitterness, via the charred wood and vanilla on the finish. The 9-Year Single Barrel is a significant uptick from the NAS small batch, as one would expect. There’s a lot going on here, and it’s good, but not quite very good. This could definitely be a sipper for me, and it represents good value in today’s market with a retail price around $57. Would I but it again? Yes. 4.0 on the Distiller scale. 120 proof. 9-Year age statement. Knob Creek 12-Year Small Batch Even with the older age statement, the 12-Year is the same Pantone 138 hue as the NAS Small Batch and 9-Year. The nose is reticent; I’m not getting nearly as many notes as I did when I reviewed it over a year ago. There is a bit of toffee, nutmeg, and come cooling spearmint. The palate is an enormous improvement, with sweet banana bread, gobs of toasted oak and vanilla, and at last, the presence of the 100 proof lifting its head. Toasted oak and vanilla continue on the medium-length finish, which then shows some espresso-tinged bitterness, likely the result of woody tannins from the extra barrel age. I reviewed the Knob Creek 12-Year on its own back on June 22, 2022. I was a little disappointed then, as the 12-year age statement is rare in today’s market at a “reasonable price,” and I rated it at 3.25 on the Distiller scale. This tasting is marginally better than my previous assessment. The aromatics today were not the same for me as they were a year ago; perhaps this is because this tasting was preceded by the 9-year, which is deeper, richer, and more complex. I prefer the 9-year to the 12-year, which can be had for around $65. Would I buy it again? Yes. But it comes with a caveat: due to the age statement, the flavor profile could change year to year, and the 12-year age statement is enough to roll the dice. 3.5 on the Distiller scale. 100 proof. 12-year age statement. N.B. All spirts tasted neat in a Glencairn glass.