Tastes
-
Monkey Shoulder Blended Malt
Blended Malt — Speyside, Scotland
Reviewed October 5, 2017 (edited October 21, 2024)PRICE: $25-35. INFO: Blended Malt from Kininvie, Glenfiddich, and Balvenie. NAS. 43% ABV. NOSE: 80/100. Nice nose. You can tell it’s young, but the youthful funk is hidden well by confident notes of hazelnut vanilla coffee creamer, clementines, and apple. A very Glenfiddich-y apple. PALATE: 76/100. That’ll do monkey. To ape the classic movie about a pig, “Babe.” This is family friendly indeed. Sweet arrival. Citrus and cream, ala orange marmalade. I even get a little bit of milk chocolate. So comforting and pleasant until you swallow, when it becomes a little harsh. FINISH: 66/100. Not a complete disaster, and I can’t complain for the price point. It’s short, and the orange flavors remain with lots of maltiness. A little bitter, a little spicy. OVERALL: Not something I seek out, but it’s something I’m always happy to have around. And if you ever do a BYOB blind tasting event, bring Monkey Shoulder. It won’t costs you much. People will give you dirty faces until they inadvertently rank this gem higher than their twice-as-expensive single malt. I will never turn my nose at a gifted Monkey Shoulder either. I don’t feel guilty for drinking too much, using it to cook, or having it side-by-side with a Guinness (delicious BTW). MARK: 75/100 VALUE FOR PRICE: Hell yes. Best bottle of scotch you can hope to purchase for under $30. -
Michter's US*1 Toasted Barrel Finish Rye (2017 Release)
Rye — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed September 29, 2017 (edited March 12, 2018)This has quickly become my go to American whiskey. It’s $75-90 per bottle, and I haven’t bought myself a bottle yet, but I’ve probably had enough pours already that I could’ve bought a bottle. Most whiskies bank on the nose, and gets weaker on the palate, and weaker still on the finish. This is a rare dram that picks up intrigue from nose, to palate, to finish. NOSE: Out of the bottle, it comes at you like a feral dog. Hot, spicy, nutty, and too oaky. Put the glass back down. It needs water and time. On the do over, after 1-1.5 teaspoon water per ounce and ~10 minutes, it becomes more composed. Vanilla, cinnamon, chocolate, rotting wood, cashews and almonds. There’s a pickled smoke background. PALATE: Definitely wait until the nose settles before you try to sip. There is a lot of rye spiciness, caramel, and chocolate on the arrival. This is an aggressive whiskey. A little bit sour, a little bit bitter, which balances well with the sweetness. With more breathing time, it rounds into Macadamia and cranberry flavors. FINISH: Addicting. As the sweetness disappears first, it’s mouth-drying and relentless with spiciness, bitterness, sourness. But then the toasted barrels show their influence and the final notes are of the best boozy Indonesian mocha beans. It lasts about an hour. You can have one pour (drink responsibly!) at a restaurant and enjoy the aftertaste throughout the drive home. WITH WATER, WITH FOOD: You need to add some water to tame this dram. I have found a lot of enjoyment using this as both an aperitif and digestif. The tartness stimulates the appetite, and transitions well into game meats such as venison or quail. By the time you are finished your meal, the remaining dram becomes more rounded. The long toasted mocha bean finish is a very rewarding desert. MARK: 87/100 -
Espolòn Añejo X Tequila
Tequila Extra Añejo — Mexico
Reviewed September 22, 2017 (edited November 28, 2022)Most extra anejo tequilas are a contradiction. Non-tequila enthusiasts are not likely to buy such expensive products. Tequila enthusiasts lament at the absence of tequila. You only need more than 3 years of aging to be labeled as extra anejo, but most distillers must be using wet casks because the spirit becomes lost in offerings such as Don Julio, Tears of Llorona, and Fuenteseca. It’s like these Mexicans are ashamed of their spirit. Enter Espolon extra anejo, aged 6 years (!) in virgin oak. So, this is not going to be like a bourbon, or a scotch, or a brandy. This is going to be agave spirit and oak. Bring it on. NOSE: Herbal and spicy. The virgin oak perfectly complements the agave notes. You get earthiness, grassiness, cinnamon, mintiness, some faint smoke from roasted plants, and faint sweetness of vanilla. PALATE: Peppery arrival. The spirit of agave is elevated, rather than hidden. You get the green cactus bolstered by nutmegs, chili peppers, and mint. Bitter lemon zest and underripe pineapple balanced with soft creamy caramel. Becomes salty towards the end. FINISH: Surprisingly briny. Dry, but not harsh. The virgin oak is reportedly not charred or toasted, but you are left with some roasting/burning banana leaves because the agave is still the star of the dram. WITH WATER: This can take a few drops, and things get sweeter and creamier. It unlocks the softer wood flavors, and definitely rounds out the drink. VERDICT: Restored my faith in tequila. At $100, this is very reasonably priced for a 6-year old tequila. A spirit-forward tequila of this age is unheard of. The bottle is beautiful, and will have to be my “black art” until I actually obtain a bottle of Bruichladdich Black Art. The only better tequila I’ve had is old (2009 and 2011) bottlings of Jose Cuervo de la Familia; sadly, the newer offerings are much worse. Currently, Espolon’s extra anejo just may be as good as it gets for tequila. MARK: 90/100. -
Had a vertical Hibiki tasting: Some lovely 1.5oz pours of Harmony ($10), 12 year ($22.50), and the 21 year ($75). I feel like Hibiki 21 is for people who enjoy giving and receiving commemorative pens. They see the big picture of accomplishment, and appreciate effortless precision and technique. I am not one of those people. So, my big picture perspective, even the top-of-the-shelf 21 year Hibiki loses out to the 12 year Yamazaki. Hibiki, as a brand, is all about harmony, meditation, asking questions without answers, writing haikus, and becoming aware of your nature and nature itself. Fine and dandy. But when I pay $75 for a dram, I want Godzilla. NOSE: Very floral. Like with Hibiki 12, I’m stuck on cherry blossoms after a light rain. Terroir is just a nice way to say stereotyping. Richer, more buttery, and more nutty than the 12. I do not get sandalwood oils with the other two Hibikis (they promised I would!), but I get some here. It’s very perfumy, like you want to pour some into a Glade plug-in. PALATE: Soft, flowery, gentle. Full body that’s all fat and no muscle. Oily. Walnut oil, citrus oils. Buttery sweetness with a hint of bitterness, ala Crème brulee with burnt sugar. Lovely apricots and nectarines. Plums and sultanas. It tastes expensive, to be sure. FINISH: Is that peat? I’ll call it lapsong suchong. Stereotyping again. Layers of various stone fruit notes, essential wood oils, rich fruitcake, slowly fading. This is a whiskey that never fought back, for better and worse. WITH WATER: Water kills Hibiki. Seriously. It’s like the twist ending to M. Night Shyamalan’s Signs. VERDICT: To summarize: it’s a blend that appeals to the tastes of the masses, and the pockets of the fortunate few; floral nose; luxurious and balanced palate; a little peat on the finish; does not like water; overpriced and overhyped, in my estimation. Sounds like Johnny Walker Blue? To be fair, Hibiki is 43% ABV and has a little more oomph, especially winning out on the finish. JW King George V is 43%. I’ve never tried King George, and it’s priced in the same ballpark as Hibiki 21 ($450-ish). If I ever make fuck you money, I’ll do a side-by-side between Hibiki 21 and King George. And I’ll have Glenfiddich 12 with a crystal dropper instead of water to zero the palate in between drams and to open up the whiskies. MARK: 84/100. Minus one star for the price.
-
Had a vertical Hibiki tasting: Some lovely 1.5oz pours of Harmony ($10), 12 year ($22.50), and the 21 year ($75). Best value for money ends up going to the 12. I did not like Harmony (63/100), and the 21 (review upcoming) did not add much to justify being 3x the price. NOSE: Sherry, not sherry! There is such a distinct Asian plum on the nose because of some Asian trickery! This was partly matured in casks that once held plum liquer. Orange marmalade. Apple juice. Floral, so, because it’s Japanese, cherry blossoms. Of course, right? Terroir does exist. It’s not a property of the spirit, it’s a property of our minds. PALATE: So soft. It’s like eating a pillow. Comparing this to the Harmony highlights the difference between a whiskey that’s subtle (the 12), and a whiskey that’s absent (Harmony). Plums, oranges, apples, and flower petals are again on the forefront, but superbly balanced with oak, vanilla, and honey. Spiciness leans towards cinnamon, but is very slight. You can tell the grain components are properly aged, and add a good backbone. FINISH: Plums stay on board, but never does it get overpowering or become unwelcomed. Fruity sweetness gradually becomes a little sour and bitter; just a gentle nudge to take another sip. I don’t mind at all. VERDICT: Nothing really pops out of this dram. It’s a picturesque scene rather than a compelling story. The price for this before Yamazaki divided by 0 was $50-60. Double that? Fine, maybe still worth it. Quadruple that? No way. Bottles are now around $200, and I don’t do investing. I know for consumption purposes, this is not worth $200. MARK: 82/100.
-
Had a vertical Hibiki tasting: Some lovely 1.5oz pours of Harmony ($10), 12 year ($22.50), and the 21 year ($75). One ounce of the Hibiki 21 is the price of an entire 750mL bottle of the Harmony… and I would rather have another ounce the 21 rather than an entire bottle of Harmony. NOSE: Bourbon and water. Is that harmony? I been smelling too many crazy cask-strength stuff recently. I had to put my nose into the glass and almost touch the liquid with a single overgrown nosehair I need to clip to get any discernable aromas. Soft, rounded notes of vanilla, oak, coconut. Maybe imagine some honeydew and bamboo forest. PALATE: Rounded to the point of being unnoticeable. At first, you’re like “Oooh, this is nice,” and then you’re like, “That’s it?” Every sip is the same as the last. Vanilla, honey, wheat, sawdust, apples. Is it muddled or is it balanced? It’s so shy, I don’t care. What I do notice is that it’s tainted by a young liquorice flavor. FINISH: It goes away. VERDICT: This is not an adequate replacement for the 12 year. The entire delicious plum, marmalade sherry profile is absent. If you’re into the whole “wellness” fad, and dig gentle, soft, meditative things, maybe Harmony is appropriate, but at a lower price point than $50-60. At $20-30, this would be adequate, but is currently way overpriced due to the Japanese whisky hype. MARK: 63/100.
-
William Larue Weller Bourbon (Fall 2016)
Bourbon — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed September 18, 2017 (edited September 24, 2017)Nothing beats a free pour for your birthday. And nothing makes you feel younger than trying new stuff. So I’ve been trying stuff outside of scotch, including bourbons. I’m really enjoying some natural strength Michter’s and Four Roses, which are expensive enough pours, so bartender asks what’s the occasion, and I say it was my birthday. He gives me an ounce of “their most sought after and rarest whiskey” on the house. Whatever. Just sayin’ that to make me feel special. I find out later that this is harder to find than Pappy, rated by most experts as better than Pappy, and some online stores are selling this marked up to as much as $890. Wow. NOSE: Probably the best nose of any bourbon I’ve tried so far. It’s utterly decadent bakery stuff with a boulangery sweetness and spiciness (as opposed to “America runs on Dunkin”). I feel most bourbons sadly strive to be the perfect corn syrup; but there’s no corn syrup in this one. There’s brown sugar, dark chocolate with cherry syrup, cloves, nutmeg, and cinnamon sprinkled on a French Baguette. The high 67.7 ABV keeps the scents under wraps. Even though you can already smell it with your nose 2 feet above the glass, you know there are pent up aromas that will explode out with some water. PALATE: Hot caramel sludge. Molten macaroons. So densely sweet and hot, it’s almost unbearable. The alcohol dries your mouth in the first 1-5 seconds, despite the rich sweetness. This transitions to the gentler tartness of grape and strawberry jams. The salivary glands start to catch up after about 10 seconds, and the mouth waters. FINISH: Baking spices and Dr. Pepper lingers on. The finish is long. The liquid is resinous and mouth-coating. As the intensity wanes, a little bit of the vanilla American oak finally is noticeable. And some coconut oil, exotic yeast proteins, sourdough sourness. WITH WATER: I had one sip neat, and then added almost 50% water by volume. Even with the addition, there’s plenty of alcohol punch. Candied fruit aromas wake up and start jumping out of the glass. The sweetness changes from brown sugar to more honeycomb. The palate is much fruitier, bordering on Juicy Fruit bubblegum, but this is balanced by tartness. The wood influence makes an earlier appearance. Neat offered some tightly wrapped flavors that spill out with the addition of water. I would recommend trying this both ways. VERDICT: Spent a long time with this one, and had fun. In the end, the Michter’s Toasted Barrel I paid for earlier was better to my tastes, but this one deserves respect because it threatened to put me on my ass. It lacks the full fruity range and salinity of a good Scotch, but this makes up for it with a confectionary clobbering. What is a fair price for this bottle? I would consider buying at the $150 range, not the >$500 prices I see online. MARK: 89/100. -
Jameson Caskmates Stout Edition
Blended — Ireland
Reviewed September 11, 2017 (edited November 24, 2017)My favorite, ahem, mixed drink is an Irish carbomb. Folks keep telling me that Jameson is stepping up their game lately. The original Jameson is a staple shot for bachannals, not something I dare analyze. Methinks what better way to reevaluate Jameson than to try their Caskmates, which is potentially 2/3 of an Irish carbomb. VERDICT: This might actually be worse than the original Jameson. Bad stout. It’s not Guinness. Not enough stout. I really have to search for the coffee and dark chocolate notes. The rest is light bodied malty creamy forgettable crap, ala Jameson. The finish is now more bitter, coppery, and unpleasant. Sadly, this is still missing a Guinness and an Irish cream. Caskmates my ass. $33 wasted. MARK: 48/100. -
Don Julio 1942 Tequila
Tequila Añejo — Los Altos, Jalisco, Mexico
Reviewed September 11, 2017 (edited January 24, 2020)This is an easy-sipping luxury tequila bottled in 1942. Yeah, right. On principle, I’m just going to call this Don Julio Too Tall. You can’t have this on any shelf except at the top of the bar (unless you have low ceilings; then you’re screwed). Goddam marketers. Alas, it works. Everyone who has had experience sipping on some spirit, without coughing and gagging, can enjoy this – this includes people who are tequila aficionados and people who don’t know anything about tequila. People with a superficial knowledge in tequila will often point to this bottle as the best there is. If you like having guests over, have one in your bar. That’s pretty much the review. NOSE: Vanilla. Caramel. Butterscotch. Not much else. Clean and straightforward. PALATE: Vanilla. Caramel. Butterscotch. So rich, so chewy, like a nougat; but definitely not very complex. Almost no spice or herbaciousness. FINISH: Vanilla. Caramel. Butterscotch. A trace of its agave roots. If you think tequila is gag reflex exercise for undergrads, this one will change your perception. VERDICT: Too Tall was aged 2.5 years in American oak bourbon casks, but the wood and bourbon influence completely take over. This is definitely a sippable tequila, but not a tastable one, which only concerns we snobby folks who can cerebralize the difference. Mexican duty frees, and reputable stores State-side have it for ~$90. Do not spend triple digits on this. Some stores are selling it for up to $150. Thanks Meek Mills. Question the quality and price tag of any product in a hip hop song; that just might be a bigger kiss of death than “travel retail exclusive.” MARK: 78/100. -
Don Julio 70 Añejo Claro Tequila
Tequila Añejo — Los Altos, Jalisco, Mexico
Reviewed September 11, 2017 (edited January 18, 2021)The prices of Don Julio bottles have been really dropping. The DJ70 used to cost easily $70, and I see bottles on sale now for $40, which is about the same price as their blanco. Of course, the DJ70 is famous (or infamous) for looking exactly like a blanco when it is in fact an anejo, which has been aged in American oak for 18 months. They used some sort of super charcoal filtration technique to filter even the color that the oak imparted until the drink has become crystal clear. Dublew Tee Fuck. Why did they do that? I guess it caters to the weird segment of liquor drinkers who think the more filtered something is, the more premium and smoother it is. Just buttshot vodka then. No taste. Gets you drunk. Anyways, I digress. NOSE: It’s strange, and unpleasant. The initial notes are green and direct, like a blanco, but you can tell it’s been aged on the backend with base notes of vanilla, cinnamon, and not-quite caramel. The rich caramel notes that are the main feature of the DJ 1942 smell artificial here. The fruity and sweet notes have a chemistry lab taint. It’s acetone is what it is. Gets that nail polish off. PALATE: It tastes better, and I get what the intention of filtering out the color is now. You get subdued agave spiciness and bitterness, which when in full force as in many blancos, can be upsetting to many palates. You get a creamy smooth vanilla sweetness that is direct and easy to drink – I guess that part of the maturation does not get filtered out with the color. You lose the distraction of complexity that all that colored goodness of cask maturation brings. Perfect for “novices.” With repeated sips, this almost becomes enjoyable. Perfect for the refined drunkard. FINISH: Bitter and sweet, but not bittersweet. Two different things going on here: the sweet vanilla continues, and there is a little bit of syrupiness at the back of the throat. And then there’s that unpleasant immature astringency creating a bitter aftertaste. This could’ve used some more time in wood for subtractive maturation. Or maybe the autotuning properties of wood maturation were filtered out with the color? VERDICT: To be sure, this one is for beginners to sipping spirits and to tequilas. For those a little more advanced, it does provide some geeky contemplation because this strange dram essentially boasts removing color, rather than sneakily adding it. What is color? Just what does it all mean? Ponder, and enjoy some DJ70 with some honey habanero guacamole; this pale shit needs some spice. MARK: 66/100.
Results 241-250 of 282 Reviews