Tastes
-
I've never really been a fan of any of the Hendrick's variants, or even the original for that matter, as I feel the unusual botanicals chosen are so aggressively on the palate that it feels more like a gin cordial than anything that could be 80 proof, let alone more. As far as this variant goes, I did have this once in a gin-heavy bar, and was very impressed at how the peach, cherry, and stone fruit really took the spotlight. The flavor was still a little too aggressive to be enjoyed as a unique gin, and instead tasted more like gin with added flavor syrups, but I'm happy that this is not the case. In any case, let's give this another try from the beginning. Did I accidentally spill peach schnapps in this? The nose is seriously full of this and not much else, but it's all very juicy and sweet overall. Additional notes of stone fruit, oily lemon peel, maraschino cherries, and sweet orange marmalade are also all present, with it all resting on a fairly dry body. The flavor starts off dry and coating the gums with a slight spice, as well as some dried citrus peels. The fruit from the nose is surprisingly second tier here, but still all comes through pretty well, if not also fairly muted. The finish returns to the dry and spicy notes of the forefront, with more of an ethanol burn than I would have expected. If the tasted flavors here sound disappointing and bleak, worry not; when I first tried this, I thought some ice would help the oils move around and the fruit come through, and this has already been proven to be the case on my end. Put some cubes in this and it becomes a cocktail all on it's own, and could easily get gin-shy individuals far more interested in the playfulness of botanical experimentation. If this is what I understand old-school Parisian gin to taste like, then this explains why the French take their food and drink so seriously.
-
When your coworker says their father bought this bottle during his travels, took one sip, didn't like it, and then proceeds to offer you the rest of the bottle for free, you simply don't say no. Already liking Laphroaig to begin with, I'm excited to taste the development from the 4 different oaks used, and am wondering what there's not to like here. Knowing that this will still have classic Laphroaig notes of brine and peat, based on the packaging, I'm to expect buttery, creamy, sweet notes that come from the oak in addition to the base profile. As long as this is the case, we should be able to put this liter bottle to good use. The color is between straw and gold, but is ultimately very light and quite translucent. The nose, not surprisingly, leads with a salty, peaty brine that's familiar, but also introduces small notes of vanilla and stewed mixed berries. Not a whole lot of complexity or depth here, and is even a bit watery overall, but still embodies classic Laphroaig so far. The initial body is extremely light as far as ethanol or any burn is concerned, but the peat and some sea spray start to creep in over time. The malty character is both slightly sour and dry at the same time, and although there is some vanilla here somewhere, it's lost and struggles to bring any much needed sweetness. I keep going back with repeated sips, but the body just isn't where it needs to be, and there isn't enough added here to be expected from 4 different oak usages that are all supposed to have different flavor profiles. So, I can certainly see the disappointment in this, and wouldn't want to have to travel globally just to have a chance to buy it, but it sure as hell is good enough to be free. However, I find myself preferring Laphroaig 10 year over this variant, enough to the point that if both were on the shelf, I can't think of a reason I would reach for this one. Still, it has a nice peated body and can get the job done if you wanted that smoky flavor without it sticking to you quite as much as some stronger variants. The packaging suggests using water or ice to bring out a "smooth buttercream flavour and tangy, liquorice finish," and although this sounds exciting, my expectations will remain low throughout.
-
This isn't an aged spirit, despite someone putting 2 years of age on this entry, in addition to "copper pot distilled" not being a cask type, but hey, good try, mate. Batch number: 1 It's strange that I've only ever tried a couple Irish gins, and have only seen a few more than that in total. You would think that with all those stills lying around in Ireland, those distillers would be cranking out more than just whiskey. Maybe there are rums, agave spirits, and gins that just aren't being distributed or leaving the country, but even if that were the case, an Asian-Irish fusion gin was not one I would have expected to see at all. They really went all in with this, too; the bottle art, design, and shape are all very unique and definitely have an Asian flair. The choice of fully opaque, coated glass also matches nicely with the exposed cork. Above all, though, the choice of Asian-inspired botanicals are not only unique by themselves, but even more exciting to be combined with an Irish base. Wow, the nose is very bright and potent here, and although the juniper is certainly present, it's not as dry as I would have expected, and is full of citrus oil, lemongrass, and a touch of allspice. A general florality starts rising, with a focus on rose, and even the specifically used persimmon is detected. A slightly sweet grain note comes around at the end, and this is also where the ethanol presents a small burn to the nostrils. The body is light and watery at first, but in a refreshing manner more than a weak one. The initial taste is definitely on the floral side, with rose starting the journey, then a touch of ginger and some lemongrass, with a just-as-quickly change to notes of cinnamon, and surprisingly, the dill is even found here. The finish plays with all of these flavors, but that dill really sticks with you, as it's very unexpected in a gin botanical blend. Although the finish does become a little dry and even spicy, it invites repeated sips to begin the process anew. For sure a memorable and unique gin with the blend of different cultures and botanicals, and as this was given as a gift to me from a native Chinese friend, I would agree with his assessment that this would excel with a small amount of ice to bring out the more Asian botanicals. I don't think this needs ice, though, and is just as approachable by itself as it is versatile in other cocktail uses. A decent price point really does round this out for a uniquely delicious gin.
-
Batch number: 23D18 (mostly illegible) Finally getting around to trying this last Christmas gift, and I'm conflicted on how to feel up front. I've always loved one of the rye-based whiskies from High West, but I can't remember if it was Bourye, Double Rye, or Rendezvous Rye. After looking through the distillery's website to try to jog my memory, I learned 3 distinct things. First, this Cask Collection product is not listed anywhere throughout the whole site. Second, the prices of all High West products have increased no less than 2-3 times over within the last ~5 years, according to listed prices of the products for purchase on the site itself. And finally, while I was still trying to decipher the differences between the core rye whiskeys, I learned that High West is clearly trying to become the American version of Johnnie Walker, as they produce blends of whiskey that are very similar to each other, most of them filled with whiskey that they do not produce, and sell it for a massive mark-up. I've never been a fan of blended whiskey, mostly because I can purchase all the individual spirits and blend them myself, and in 9 out of 10 cases, save loads of money based on volume. However, blending also feels almost disrespectful to the origin distillers, since the blender is affirming that their blend tastes better than the sum of it's parts, while overshadowing any natural flavors of each individual base spirit. All that aside, I'm always a fan of finishing barrels, especially when the finish is new, unique, or downright weird. In this case, I feel the use of the specific cabernet sauvignon barrels is risky, since the tannic, dry, almost bitter notes that are possible from this grape don't seem like they would play well with the sweet, grain-forward, boozy notes of a bourbon. I love being pleasantly wrong and put in my place by a surprising underdog, though, so I'm hoping this is one of those reviews. From what I was able to find outside of the distillery's website, this is a blend of 4-9 year old bourbons that was finished in cabernet sauvignon barrels for 9 months, which brings about an expectation of a noticeably darker color. This indeed rings true, as certain light and backgrounds can turn the glass from an expected golden brown, to a cherry-chocolate color, and sometimes even a touch of black on the edges. The nose is both sweet and fruity, and funny enough, even has a slight cherry cordial scent to it. Dry, toasted oak, a general florality, mixed red berries, and a touch of banana and tobacco are also among the nose during repeated smelling. The ethanol is balanced, as it's not light or nonexistent, but also isn't strong enough to singe nose hairs. Initial flavors focus on slightly sweet red berries, with a big focus on milk chocolate and a much lighter note of banana. The ethanol quickly heats up the whole mouth, with a focus on the gum-line, but without penetrating very deeply. The body is overall quite dry, which prevents the finish from being very long, although a note of sweet oak can be savored throughout the short, yet powerful finish. This is definitely very tasty, which isn't all that surprising, but I am a little shocked at how hot and concentrated the entire flavor profile is, while only being 100 proof. I've had hot spirits (mostly whiskey) at this proof point, but it's far more common to be underwhelmed than the inverse. Also, while wine barrel finishing is certainly not new, I did not expect the choice of only cabernet sauvignon barrels to work out, but it thankfully delivered the juicy, berry notes to the end product, while leaving behind the heavier tannic and earthy flavors. This definitely is a fun and delicious whiskey with a unique barrel finish that was also unexpected to have worked out so well. I enjoyed this neat, and am just as excited to add water, ice, and play with cocktail experimentation, but I don't think it's worth the exuberant price point this distillery is moving toward, especially since the barrel finishing is the only thing that High West contributed to this likely MGP-made base.
-
Jefferson's Tropics Aged in Humidity
Bourbon — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed February 3, 2024 (edited October 21, 2024)Not often do I get excited and impressed about having found something that I was passively looking for, but this hit that part of my brain earlier today. After this released, I wrote it off to never be found, let alone in Ohio, but there it was, on the "regular" shelf, and at MSRP! I don't care who you are, if you're shopping in the American whiskey asile and you see the word "Singapore," your interest will be piqued. Plus, knowing and having sampled many, if not all the Jefferson's line of products, I've always been interested in the different finishing processes they've used, especially the location-based ones from the Ocean line. The idea of playing with the environment on the aging process is such a unique, genius breakaway from the safe, almost milk-toast weather of Kentucky. With the Ocean barrels proving these environment changes are noticeable, the humid and much hotter finish in Singapore sounds like both a safe and delicious entry into the Tropics series. With the added finishing time in the much hotter environment, I would expect a much darker color from the accelerated barrel interaction, but instead it's somewhere between sherry and copper with a touch of light gold. The nose is nutty and full of dark caramel, with an approachable ethanol and a touch of cinnamon. There's also a strange sourness after repeated scents, but is also somehow raw and sweet, like drinking cooking sherry with a sugar-coated glass. The initial flavor digs well into the gums, and becomes spicy quite quickly. Actually, the spice is quite aggressive, like sucking on a cinnamon stick dipped in pure high wine while chewing through some Red Hots. This calms down after a short time, while light caramel and young corn begin taking over. This continues through the finish, which is dry, but fades very quickly. It really only occurs to me now that, although expectations for this were high, the simplicity behind it makes it easier to detect the differences from the finishing process. The intensity from the Singapore weather created a whiskey that's both hot and aggressive (fitting for cask strength drinkers), but would also benefit greatly from a couple ice cups to cool it down and unlock a few more layers. I still think this is a great first entry for the Tropics series, but the premium is too high for flavors that can be found in similarly priced products, some of which with much higher age statements, if you take the time to search.100.0 USD per Bottle -
Ahh, the French champagne... Wait, wrong commercial. The best way to follow up an at-home wine tasting seemed to be cheap cognac, and until I find one, I guess this will do. All joking aside, even for a half bottle, a price of $5 for an 80 proof spirit felt like I was stealing something. I'm not a brandy fan, and I'm certainly ignorant in a lot of production and facts behind it, but I know VSOP has a quality increase compared to VS, so a $1 difference in the bottles seemed like an obvious, if not concerning, choice. I know Paul Masson far more for their flavored brandies, but since flavored isn't my thing, I'm excited to taste the base that drives the popularity in all these other products. 4 years aged really did a number on the color here, as it almost looks like garnet, scarlet, and maroon had a baby, in addition to the expected chestnut brown. Dry oak and raw ethanol initially on the nose, with some overripe banana, brown sugar, and a touch of raisin behind it. Mostly sweet but without the grape musk or fig that's usually present on brandies that I've had, and isn't overpowering while still providing a savory dryness as well. A slightly dry, spicy, and watery body tasted up front. The banana comes back, mushy with some brown sugar and sweet oak alongside it. The body returns lighter and lighter with each sip, with a hint of rum notes coming up as well. The finish comes back dry and spicy, returning full circle from the initial taste, and only a minimal amount of grape musk. I've always been a firm believer in "you get what you pay for," but this is very impressive for the cost, at least, to me it is. With a more refined palate for brandy, I'm sure I could appreciate many more products and easily forget about this one, but I will absolutely savor the blissful ignorance in this instance as long as I can. Hell, I'd pay any amount of money for this amount of simple ignorance in the craft American whiskey market, but I digress. Maybe this is a simple, unrefined cognac, or maybe it actually is an unsung hero of taste for an actual fair, affordable price... What a world that would be. I'll surely be trying this out in some classic cocktails to see if it can stand up there as well, but even if it doesn't, it seems easy and obvious to me to get a few dollars together to keep this on the bar whenever the craving strikes.
-
Log Still's take on modern, American gin was tasty when I sampled it after touring the distillery last weekend, but I personally didn't find it unique enough to take it home. My wife, however, disagreed, and for how affordable the bottle was, I'm glad we brought it home after all. I'm always looking for any new modern gin to stow on the shelf, especially ones that have very specific botanical blends that cut through the aggressive, dry, one-note London gins; leave it to England to conquer the world for spices hundreds of years ago, then proceed to use none of them. Anyway, although I don't remember the Monk's Road classic gin for being that memorable tasting less than a week after tasting it, I loved the unique additive of watermelon for one of the botanicals, and perhaps I just need more of it to try in my own environment to unlock more of that flavor. The nose is very dry, and leads mostly with the juniper, despite the distillery representative proudly claiming the botanical blend helped steer away the aggressive juniper. It's also very clean, but unfortunately clean in the sense of cleaning supplies, with a slight ethanol tinge behind it to boot. There is a medium nose of lemon and lime peels and oils, coriander, and just a touch of the watermelon if you go reaching for it. A fairly watery body starts things off, with baking spices leading the flavor charge, including coriander and even some cardamom. Some floral notes start to surface, specifically lilac and lavender, but are very faint. The citrus is one of the last things I taste as the body gets a tad bit hotter, and it's very dry, as if all the oil has dried out with just a bit of rind and pith remaining. I really want to taste the watermelon since it's clearly the most unique botanical used, but I think any flavor I'm just barely getting is only a placebo effect. In the end, this affects me the same as it did while at the distillery; fairly uneventful and plain, but still a good entry into modern/American gin if you're new to the style. I definitely remember the barrel aged gin much more, but after finding out they used a different botanical blend for that one (one that much better complimented the added barrel flavors and character), it makes sense that this gin and the particular botanical blend used is a smart choice for their first and base gin product. Again, if you're looking to break away from the London or juniper-heavy gin world but don't want to stray too far at first, this is a great gin to start that journey with, especially at a very affordable price point. Here's hoping some ice or water will unlock a bit more of the citrus and spring-type botanicals.
-
Yellowstone Kentucky Straight Bourbon Finished with Toasted Oak Staves
Bourbon — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed January 20, 2024 (edited January 31, 2024)Another Limestone Branch trip, another master distiller signed bottle, and another beautiful piece to round out my shelf. Originally I had no interest in this product, mostly because they have another product with "toasted barrel" right on the label. Because of the confusion, I emailed the distillery before this product even released, in order to help clarify the differences, and never received a response. 3+ months later, I happened to be in the area for some other distillery hopping, and couldn't resist stopping by for an updated tour, since I haven't had an official tour in ~6 years. During the tasting, both this product and the "Toasted Barrel" black label product were tasted, definitely with noticeable differences, but the explanation there was what I finally wanted. Apparently the black label product utilized a multi-use barrel from several kinds of spirits, and was never explained when I first purchased that. This toasted "finish" product, on the other hand, was explained as the more traditional aging, then inserting toasted barrel staves to finish it for a short period of time. At the distillery, I was told that American oak was used, but now I see from the Distiller description that many types of staves were used, in addition to American oak. I hope that this mess and lack of information sharing by the distillery is no indication to how the Yellowstone line will be expanding and changing, especially since these new products are all very unique and have noticeably different flavor profiles. The color reflects the classic chestnut brown in the center of the glass, but the meniscus is very light, almost straw or lemony yellow; expected for the 4 year base, but the toasted staves may be responsible for the added lightness. The nose is full of freshly cooked grain, mostly too young but with enough barrel character to add a much-needed sweetness. There are also shockingly specific notes of lemon zest, toasted baking spices, fresh strawberry jam, and some light florality on a creamy, dry finish with a touch of burn from the ethanol. Surprisingly, these are all the basic notes I expected from all the added staves that were used, and I didn't expect all the very different profiles to meld together so well. The body begins with very light flavors, but lacks the watery character found in lighter proofs. Vanilla is one of the first flavors that rises up, alongside light toasted spices and a general florality. The vanilla really continues, with some light caramel alongside it, with the body picking up the spices and gum burn from the ethanol without being unapproachable. All the notes found on the nose from the toasted staves are all tasted in a small amount, but all at once instead of being layered as they were then on the nose. The finish falls off fairly quickly as far as the toasted flavors go, but the original bourbon base sticks around with some young corn, while the rye flavors push into the outer surface of the gums. In the end, it's not that I'm surprised that the toasted stave flavor came through as much as it did, but instead it's shocking how concentrated those flavors are, and how much each type of stave was represented here. Because flavors of the young grain and fresh, still fairly aggressive corn are tasted throughout sips, this leads me to think that perhaps the young overall age of the base bourbon here are what led to the toasted flavors coming through the way they did. My mind naturally wants to compare this to a particular popular wheated bourbon that allows custom staves to be added to a finishing process, but I've never been able to dissect a lot of those added stave flavors from that product as much as I have been here. I'd love to see more finished bourbons and American whiskeys in general, but of those, I'd be more curious to see young base whiskeys used and then letting any additional age time desired to be done with the finishing wood. After all, the longer a whiskey ages, the more character it has by itself, and the more it should never be adjusted from that well-earned journey. All said, if you're looking for a quality toasted finished bourbon (and don't mind a slightly higher proof and body) on the market for a very similar price, go for this, especially over the black label/black sheep "toasted barrel" product from the same distillery. -
Monk's Road Single Barrel Bourbon
Bourbon — Gethsemane, KY, USA
Reviewed January 18, 2024 (edited June 8, 2024)Privately selected & bottled exclusively for: Log Still Veterans 2023 Barrel number: LSD6998 Bottle number: 132 Proof: 122.77 Something gripped me about the Log Still distillery when I visited them earlier this week. For being nestled quite far in a rural area, it really welcomes people in, starting as soon as you see the iconic water tower in the distance. The whole music and event scene is super unique and helps to bring people in, but it always boils down to how the spirits come across, and there was something about the classic Monk's Road bourbon that I had that was impressive in a way that I haven't experienced with other craft American whiskey in quite some time. I took a gamble and went with the last bottle of this single barrel, mostly after learning that it was chosen by all the veterans working at the distillery (I believe it was 13 total vets), and being assured that most of them were Air Force, so it was likely that it was a quality barrel. Life turned even better when I noticed the proof was so high (the highest off all the single barrel batches they offered at the time), which is even further proof that military was involved in the process. For being a young, wheated bourbon with no other specialities used or found in the distilling process, the classic Monk's Road had a well-rounded flavor that steered away from the expected softness and sweetness of most other wheated bourbons. Although this particular single barrel of this whiskey was available for tasting there, I decided to purchase it blind, and we'll see how the Nelson County veterans picked after all. I can't remember if the base Monk's Road was 4 or 6 years aged, but even with the higher age, the color is quite impressive in it's depth, without knowing the size or char level of the barrels. I attribute this to the high absence of excess water, which is further evidenced during the first few smells from the glass. Instead of the ethanol being overbearing and burning the nostrils, it instead helps concentrate the other notes found. The nose is full of the iconic sweet grain smell from a freshly cooked mash that just started fermentation, the same smell that wafted over the whole campus of the distillery while I was there. This may be the best American whiskey that has captured this scent in the final spirit, especially so because of the high concentration from the aforementioned proof. Strangely enough, I also smell iconic cinnamon and spearmint/grass that comes along with rye whiskey, despite none being used here in leiu of the sweeter, softer wheat. Rounding things out, there are also notes of cream soda as well as a slight earthy/smoky smell. First flavors are full of cinnamon and other similar baking spices, but blend alongside the expected soft body created from the wheat. The proof is initially fairly approachable, but quickly moves to scorch the gums, but more on the surface than the penetrating manner that rye usually does. A slight watery earthiness surfaces, and although there is a creamy and an even smaller floral flavor present if I really reach for them, the burning ethanol turns away any sweetness or further flavors, and keeps the mouth hot all the way through the finish and beyond. As compared to the classic Monk's Road bourbon, this is aggressive, hot, and difficult to find any secondary tasting notes... Which makes it a highly desirable spirit for any service member that needs that stiff drink. I won't say I prefer the batched original version over this based on taste alone, but I can say that if you don't desire a more powerful, concentrated craft bourbon flavor in leiu of the more approachable body of the proofed down, batched version, then this single barrel isn't for you. But if that does sound good, this is a very nice price point (I like how Distiller considers ~$60 as 3 out of 5 dollar signs in cost, despite this being very affordable for the craft American whiskey market) that blends the flavors of both rye and wheat based bourbons, despite only using the latter as the flavoring grain. I think this may be too aggressive as a neat drinker, but has an almost infinite excitement for use in cocktails and other ice-based drinks, considering the fresh mash flavor is still present in the core, but just needs a little bit of taming to shine through. -
My wife has been searching for her own bottle of this after trying it at a nearby lounge, and we finally picked it up a few nights ago. I have never personally been a fan of Hendrick's, as I've thought even the base spirit had certain botanicals that were aggressive and too overpowering, with the variants being even further away from a more traditional gin flavor. However, Hendrick's markets themselves as a modern gin and is fully aware of their uniqueness of ingredients, so there's no docking them for that. This variant seems very curious, since nowhere on the bottle or website is there any list of the specific additional botanicals that were used, instead using creative buzzwords and leaving the flavor profile up to imagination. Based on this, I'm expecting obvious and heavy use of flowers or other garden botanicals that are not present in other competitive modern gins. The nose indeed reflects floral notes alongside a soft base of coriander and juniper. I get very green, leafy notes of non-specific fresh plants, with a focus on roses and lavender. There's a small ethanol kick present, but not enough to force you to draw back from the glass. Repeated smelling brings small notes of lemon and lime zest, and an even smaller hint of raw cacao. The body is quite light, but also fairly watery, with immediate flavors of the same roses and lavender found on the nose, alongside some baking spice and fairly soft, approachable juniper. The finish has a dry, perfume-y taste, while the body remains light and falls off pretty quickly. There's a small tingle in the front of the gums, but not enough to be considered spicy or boozy. That same raw cacao comes around through the finish, but repeated sips continue to bring up more and more plain floral notes without any specificity. There indeed is a noticeable uniqueness of flavor to this Hendrick's variant, but ultimately falls flat with the delivery. It's especially difficult to deliver an aggressively floral flavor without any speicifc promises to go off of, so this leads the customer to draw their own conclusions, and, in my case, this doesn't quite hit the mark. If you must have a gin with these specific floral notes in it for some cocktail, the price point is still very fair here. And speaking of cocktails, I find it a very nice touch to include a cocktail recipe right on the bottle that benefits from using this speicifc variant; this is likely a turning point detail contributing to a good chunk of sales to those who love spirit-specific cocktails. As for myself, I am hesitant for cocktail use, especially with a lot of ice, because the body is already so light and very well may easily be drowned out by other additives or ingredients.
Results 21-30 of 361 Reviews