Tastes
-
Yellow Spot 12 Year Single Pot Still
Single Pot Still — Ireland
Reviewed November 10, 2020 (edited April 29, 2021)Rating: 17/23 N: This has a substantially different nose than Green Spot does. This one is simultaneously more restrained, less sweet, more oily, and characterized by richer, more dried fruit scents. I get some spicy wood and vanilla from the bourbon barrels on a slightly bitter, oily backing that is more watery than rich. The fruit smells are dried with sultanas being the big one, but also regular raisins and hints of dried orange peel and cherry. It's a good nose, though I would prefer it to be fuller and sweeter. P: This is a fuller, richer palate than Green Spot has by a long shot. It immediately has sweet dried fruits (particularly sultanas, orange peel, and apricot) balanced by some quite spicy barrel that is unfortunately a bit harsh. On first sip alone, this is a big improvement over Green Spot and is a very good 12 year old whiskey. Some grain tartness comes out, bringing with it some harshness comparable to that in Green Spot, but it is not excessive. Oiliness is there providing an extra bitter layer to the backing. I'm not a fan of the oiliness, but it does at least let me know that this is a good Irish whiskey in spite of it having the usual flavor profile at its core. With a substantial dose of water, I do start getting the Green Spot bubblegum and cotton candy again, but it takes a while to get to that point. It's flawed, but it's a good palate. F: The bitter oiliness lasts for a long time, mixed with spicy wood, hints of minerals and vanilla, and some wafts of the fruits. I don't love this finish, but I can accept it. I would take this over Green Spot any day of the week, even if I had to pay up to get it. The added richness and maturity of the flavors here is a big improvement. This is a more challenging drink than Green Spot, but I really appreciate its increased maturity and nice finishing. This is not an excellent whiskey though. It's impressive for a 12 year old Irish whiskey, but for $80 there are many others that I'd rather have instead. I can't imagine rating this higher than an 18 or lower than a 15, so it's probably a 16 or 17. I'll give it a 17 for now.79.0 USD per Bottle -
Yellow Spot 12 Year Single Pot Still
Single Pot Still — Ireland
Reviewed November 10, 2020 (edited April 29, 2021)18: This doesn't revolutionize whiskey, but it is very good. Sweetness with orange and a but of smoke giving it depth. It's a terrific choice. The right hness definitely has nutty and maybe even milk chocolatey influences, but the malt does not disappear. It isn't the king of the hill, but this is a massive success. Irish whiskey is able to stand it's ground, even when it does not cost as much as Bushmill's 21. The depth impresses, the richness impressed, and the smoothness impresses. This is creamy, fruity, rich (in a nutty way), and delightful. Just a bit of spice makes it through. This is magnificently balanced with a tremendous finish. It is unbelievably hard to accept that this is a 12 year whiskey...and from Ireland! There is no avoiding the marvelousness of Yellow Spot 12. And at the price, this is probably the best Irish whiskey you can buy. This has a weird amount of caramel and brown sugar to it. It's rich, but in a kind of immature way. I enjoy it well enough, but it doesn't achieve greatness. It's quite impressive for a 12 year though.79.0 USD per Bottle -
Rating: 14/23 I know it's artificial, but I really love the color of this. Imagine the pristine blue water of the ocean waves approaching a white Caribbean beach as viewed from above. N: It's tropical fruity with a clear bias toward citrus. I get lemon, lime, orange, passionfruit, and possibly mango and pineapple. It smells tart, but still sweet and very juicy. It smells enticing, like a refreshing cocktail for a summer day. P: Very fruity. I get orange with a lot of lemon tartness and some lime bitterness leading into a bit of passionfruit. I'm not sure that I quite taste the mango or pineapple that I might have smelled, but maybe they are there. I can imagine that there is some cognac in here, but I can equally imagine that it's all well-executed vodka though. A nice corn or wheat vodka would make sense given the sweetness and fullness, but it does remind me just a tad of Grand Marnier, so I definitely believe their claim that there is at least a dash of cognac. It's very balanced if you'd like a good hit of citrus like in lemonade or limeade and the complexity is decent. F: It citric and drying just like the end of a glass of lemonade. This is richer, fuller, and more complex than lemonade without just having a big blast of one other flavor like most flavored (e.g. mango) lemonades. It's a bit too puckering on the finish, but it feels right given the nose and palate. So on it's own it essentially tastes like a cocktail with the fruits dialed up to 11. And by fruits, I mean citrus. It isn't bad, but it does make me think of a cocktail in a bottle mixed with orange concentrate (you know, from the freezer section, or from Trading Places if you prefer a dated movie reference that doesn't help you understand what I'm writing about). It's solid enough to drink on its own, though I really would like a bit more going on. It's simultaneously hard to figure out what to do with this and also hard to go wrong with it. What do I mean by that? I mean that there is no clear purpose that I can say it was designed for (well, there are like 2 cocktails), but it also fits in all sorts of fruity drinks. Essentially, if you have a fruity cocktail (I mean one with a substantial amount of fruit juice), there's a decent chance that throwing a bit of this in could make it better and there's not a huge risk of making it worse. Hypnotiq's flavor is pretty much citrus with some tropical influence though, so its complexity is likely to get flattened in mixing. That makes it hard to rate. The value for money question is also out to the jury, though for drinking on its own, I'd wager that some fresh lemons and limes with some orange liqueur and a few good base spirits would be cheaper and also more flexible. This isn't bad and it's not very expensive either though, so I wouldn't be afraid of buying a bottle. Come summer, it should be pretty easy to make use of. Now, I do think that I saw a mention of some cocktail somewhere mixing this with Chartreuse Green. Throwing a dash of Chartreuse Green in with this really made it less biting and added a lot more complexity. It was a big improvement. It might be a decent way to use Chartreuse Green or not (considering the price). It isn't as good as Chartreuse Green neat and even gin actually made it worse (though maybe I picked the wrong gin). The color is pretty cool at least - very tropical, just like a clean ocean meeting a pristine beach! It really helps to sell the whole experience. I think that this is most suited for some variation on a Mai Tai. Maybe it makes sense to use this in place of some or all of the lime juice and simple sugar and then reduce the amount of rum as well. This works pretty well mixed with some good light rum and a bit of dark rum (maybe 2:1 light:dark). I could have a lot of fun with this and while I don't see myself buying another bottle soon, that largely has to do with a lack of shelf space (the trials of collecting liquor!). I don't really think that the value for money is here since at only 17% ABV. I could instead get a $44 bottle of rum and water it down with fruit juice (OK, $44 less the price of the fruit juice, so let's call it $30-35). and probably get a better result. Well, at least if I'm allowed to assume a situation in which I'm debating between buying a few bottles of rum to use for cocktails at parties over the course of a summer versus buying several bottles of this, I can probably do better using some rum at the $20 range with a little bit of Grand Marnier. This is fun and easy to use though and the fact that I actually had to do some math indicates that it isn't too far off from being a decent value. In terms of raw quality, I think I'm going with a 14. It's pretty tasty, but it's kind of hard to drink neat because the citrus is a bit much for me. I can't quite figure out what to do with it in cocktails and I don't really think it's bringing anything to the table that I can't get with rum (and/or other spirts/liqueurs that are not too expensive and I likely already have stocked) and fruit juice. I like this pretty well given the price, but it would be at best a 15 and I might drop it to a 13 if I found on closer analysis that it consistently produced inferior cocktails.18.0 USD per Bottle
-
15: The blue color is obviously fake. The flavor is very fruity and initially has quite and appealing sweetness but then it develops a bitter bite. The flavor is also kind of watery. It's very tropical, with lots of orange, mango, passion fruit, and pineapple coming through. There's a bit of mint too and some lemon and underripe strawberry really drive home the more biting side of this drink. It's kind of like a fun punch that is a bit too aggressive. There's a hint of licorice on the nose, but the mint is really the main medicinal flavor. I wouldn't want to sip a whole lot of this, but I might sip a little. It could be an effective mixer with rum to make a nice fruity drink. The grapefruit presence is really what does this in. I wish that there were far less grapefruit. This is OK with E&J XO. It works nicely in a refreshing way with Beefeater gin. Chopin vodka is fine but not terribly exciting. Rye whiskey synergizes well, enhancing the flavor. Irish whiskey (Kavanagh) is not a great combination. The combination with Old Forester Signature is good. Mixing with Symbole National is a delightful balance. That Symbole National balance is so sublime that this instantly becomes a terrific cocktail. Amaretto is a nice complement. Hypnotic plus Symbole National plus amaretto? A fantastic cocktail. This isn't a standard liquer but it is surprisingly versatile and delicious. Framboise is a surprisingly ill-fitting flavor, but Cointreau is quite good. OK, Cointreau on its own doesn't work too well, but mixed with framboise it is quite good. The mix with Grand Marnier is interesting and rich it it could use some more balance. The mix has a weird tequila flavor. Some amaretto balances it out a bit though.18.0 USD per Bottle
-
Rating: 13/23 OK, I just noticed that Dickel is spelling it "whisky" (without an "e"). I'm still confused by this, but mostly I just wish that everyone would agree on one way to spell this word. This does not affect my rating; it's just a thing. N: I get a bit of light but generic rye smell with herbal and floral scents that occasionally veer into soap territory. A bit of mineral as well. Overall, it doesn't smell all that complex, but it generally smells refreshing and like it has a lot of rye. It certainly does smell young though. P: I get the rye from the nose, but the palate is richer and has just a bit of caramel in it as well. It's herbal and floral too with the minerality really coming out and making it taste lighter and younger than I'd like. It dips into soap territory a bit at times, unfortunately, too. This is actually decently complex - certainly moreso than the nose is. There is some alcohol showing through though. F: The complexity of the palate fades into sort of a sickly sweet, unpleasant flavor. The alcohol was there in the palate, but now it comes out more and exacerbates the sweetness. It isn't awful, but it is a big disappointment. I'm pretty confident I'm tasting the youth here because it reminds me of the sweet part of Copper Fox Rye, which is only aged 20 months (side note: try a pour of Copper Fox Rye if you get a chance - it's some weird stuff (and also has fox in its name)). I have to say that this Dickel is growing on me. Side-by-side, it now seems a lot better than Templeton 4 now with its increased spicy and herbal characters and simultaneous reduction in syrupy, floral, vanilla sweetness. The alcohol does show through here more and I sure wish that it didn't, but this is still superior. It's also better than Wild Turkey Straight Rye, which kind of tastes like young nothing. This is somehow richer, and it also has more personality and rye flavor. This is actually moving into sipping territory a tad. I'm increasingly appreciating the clean, distinct rye flavors here. Don't get me wrong though: this is still too young. In comparison, Sazerac tastes mature even though it is (in my opinion) not a very full, mature rye. I'd love to get a more aged version of this. Isn't that what everyone says though: the problem with MGP bottlings is that most aren't aged long enough? I'm definitely considering this as a potential ingredient for at home blending, but I've tried a bit and I still need to figure out a way to deal with that youth. For the price, this seems like a reasonable value. I'm really disappointed that Dickel doesn't seem to have an older (MGP) rye though. Considering that I gave Wild Turkey Straight Rye a 10, this is pretty solidly a 12 and it could be a 13. I have Sazerac at a 14 and while its richer nuttiness and maturity make it better overall, it isn't as complex and interesting as this is. Considering that, I think that this is closer in quality to Sazerac than to Wild Turkey Straight Rye, so I'll give this that bump up to 13.18.0 USD per Bottle
-
Rating: 15/23 N: It's pretty rich with oily, nutty, and caramel notes. It does feel a bit forced though somehow. There's actually not a lot going on here, even in comparison with Sazerac, which is less rich on the palate. P: It's bold and rich. There's a big alcohol bite mixed with some youthful caramel, rich juicy cherry, oiliness, a bit of peanut. It's richer than Wild Turkey 101, but it has the same youthfulness and tastes a bit like somebody just poured some sort of caramel syrup into it. F: There's some bitterness mixed with the caramel and cherry that tastes a bit off somehow. There's maybe a hint of something metallic as well. It's not as good as the palate, but at least it has presence, unlike the nose. There's something a bit off about the flavor here. It does remind me of Pikesville in a good way, but it definitely tastes less mature and put-together. This is richer than Sazerac and doesn't have the same problem with being light, but it's also less balanced and a bit artificial somehow. I'm torn between 14 and 15 on this one. The flavor is delightfully rich, but also just off somehow. I think what pushes me over the edge though is that the richness makes this a pretty good mixer. I'll give it a 15 for that reason, but I won't be at all surprised if I drop it to a 14 in the future.21.0 USD per Bottle
-
Rating: 13/23 This is the last pour in the bottle and I'm trying it side by side with Lunazul Reposado. N: Decently rich. There's definitely a decent amount of wood influence, with standard toasted American Oak spiciness and hints of vanilla. I get the agave's vegetal flavor as well, along with some mineral notes from its youth and a bit of caramel. There isn't much going on here, but it isn't bad. P: The palate is a lot better than the nose. It's fairly rich with plenty of wood and spices, as well as a some agave syrup melding into sweet caramel. I get some of the agave vegetal and somewhat herbal flavor and plenty of vanilla. There is mineral as well, but it isn't overwhelming. I'd call this a kind of light añejo, but it's still reasonably full. It isn't all that complex though. F: The agave flavor lingers with the wood for a while, but the minerals and vegetal element along with a bit of cinnamon burn gradually take over. It's pretty meh. I can't say I am a big fan of this, but it's a perfectly serviceable tequila. I'm torn between a 13 and a 14 for it. I'm leaning toward rating Lunazul Reposado, Cabo Wabo Blanco, and this 12, 13, and 14, respectively, but I'm still very borderline on all of this. I'm going to try something bold and do a cross-category comparison to try to ground my rating here. Wild Turkey 101 is my quintessential 14 at this point, so let's see if this meets that bar. Hmm, no. This is less complex and less tasty. It could be the lower ABV, but, regardless, I like this less. Jim Beam Black is more of a 13 (though I occasionally think it might be a 12) and this is pretty close to that. I like this a bit more than the Jim Beam, but not enough to move it past a 13. I think that means I'm landing on ratings of 11, 12, and 13, unfortunately.30.0 USD per Bottle
-
Rating: 10/23 I threw this into a bunch of mixed drinks in order to get rid of the bottle as quickly as possible, but even that didn't work too well. Finally, I'm on to my bottle kill tasting. N: Rye with a bit of meat. It doesn't smell like a super young rye, but I suspect that's because low amount of rye is masked by the other grains. I get a bit of mint and floor polish. Not much going on here and it doesn't smell really good either. P: Like the nose, this is pretty flat. I get some herbal and vegetal flavors from the rye. It tastes a little bit young, but not too bad. It's actually a bit better than when I first tried it so it could either be just a different palate or maybe the air was good for this. I do get a bit of meatiness from the alcohol though, and a bit of minerality further increasing the lightness. So there's a bit more complexity than before, but it's still flat and bland with some off notes. F: The off notes of alcohol and meat linger, along with a faint hybrid of mineral and floor polish. There are faint herbal notes, but not too much. This is probably the worst part of the experience. This is still a really disappointing rye. It didn't even make a great mixer because it is fairly light. At its best, there are genuine flavors that make me consider giving it a 12, but I often find myself thinking of it in 10 or even 9 territory because of the off notes. At least it isn't harsh though. I think I'm going to settle on a 10 to 11 because it isn't all that bad, but I really would rather not ever drink it. It might be comparable in quality to Ezra Brooks, but that's as generous as I think I can be. I think I'm going to go with a 10 this time I would consider raising it up to an 11 if I ever tried it again (but I hope I won't).20.0 USD per Bottle
-
Rating: 12/23 N: This has a richer, somewhat oilier nose than Lunazul Reposado does. I get floral and vanilla notes, but also just substantial agave vegetal scent with a bit of herbal character. There isn't much going on here, but it toes the line between light and rich fairly well. Just smelling this, I can imagine the agave being stewed. That isn't true for Lunazul Reposado. P: I recall this having tons of vanilla, but although it does still have quite a bit of vanilla, it has way more stewed agave than I remembered. It's on the light side, but it's quite natural and has a nice bit of oiliness. I get a mix of vegetal, light savory, faintly herbal, and kind of briny flavors. There's nothing special going on here, but it is pretty solid. There's also quite a bit of cardboard Definitely a good choice for mixing, but it's also sippable. It really just isn't that interesting though. F: The cardboard remains the most, along with a vague creek water sweetness. There are suggestions of the agave flavors and vanilla, but nothing too strong here. This is kind of a disappointing finish. Lunazul Reposado is more complex, but also more immature and also a bit harsher. Both of these are fine enough and considering the price I think I'd go for the Lunazul, but between the two, I do find the Cabo Wabo to be a bit more enjoyable. It may be less complex, but I get a bit more of that natural agave flavor in it. I'm thinking 12 or 13 for this one. I compared it with Lunazul Reposado and El Mayor Añejo and determined that this was the middle one. Most likely, their ratings are 11, 12, and 13. I can imagine them being 11, 13, and 13, or even 12, 13, and 13, but I really think that 12 is what this probably deserves. For a simple cross-category comparison, I think I'd rather have Jim Beam Black than this, but I'd rather have El Mayor Añejo than Jim Beam Black. Jim Beam Black is a 13, but sometimes maybe a 12, so this is clearly a 12, unfortunately.25.0 USD per Bottle
-
Lunazul Reposado Tequila
Tequila Reposado — Tequila Valley, Jalisco, Mexico
Reviewed November 4, 2020Rating: 12/23 N: Floral, mineral, sweet. A bit on the light side. A little bit of vanilla and wood, but it maintains some of that classic agave character as well, bringing in a little bit of herbal and vegetal scent. Not bad, but it does all end up a bit light and muddled. P: There's more presence here than on the nose, with a richer, more bitter agave character coming out. It's still quite floral with a clean spring water mineral sweetness, so it's better for a refreshing summer margarita than a fall or winter dram. I get a little bit of wet cardboard, but it kind of works. It's nowhere near as extreme as in Gran Centenario Reposado or San Matias Legado Blanco. There's a little bit of spice in here as well, with cinnamon being the most prominent flavor. This does have more of that agave tartness and saltiness than El Major Añejo does. F: The finish isn't all that rich. It's kind of sweet and papery with some spring water mixed with a dash of vegetal and light caramel flavor. It's inoffensive, but pretty bland. Like Lunazul Blanco, I initially find myself quite impressed by this one. I get a fair amount of character to it and there's perhaps a tad more complexity even now that there's that little bit of wood in this. Still, in comparison with other tequilas, it's light and a bit flat. I'm looking at the 11 to 13 range for this one. There's enough complexity that I think it at least avoids a 10 and there's nothing particularly bad about it flavor-wise, but it kind of falls flat with too much light mineral character. It really just leaves me wanting something with more character. I prefer El Mayor for its richness, but the gap isn't as large as I might have thought (probably just 1 point, but there's a bit too much ethanol coming out in this, so it could be 2 points). I've compared this with Cabo Wabo Blanco and El Mayor Añejo and determined that I like this the least of the three. It is therefore a 12 at best, but, unfortunately, I really think it's an 11. I'm still very borderline though. I've been doing a lot of cross-category comparisons against bourbon with these three, so I might as well continue. I would probably take this over Ancient Age, but I would prefer Evan Williams Bottled In Bond. Neither is far closer than the other, so that puts this right in the 11 to 12 range. Considering that if anything I would raise the ratings of both Ancient Age and Evan Williams and that at times I though that this might match Cabo Wabo, I'll go ahead and give this a 12.17.0 USD per Bottle
Results 671-680 of 1462 Reviews