Tastes
-
A gift from a visiting friend, this is my first experience with this distillery. Tasted neat from a NEAT tasting glass after a few moments rest. I've had this on a few occasions already and the bottle is about 2/3 full after this pour. It's been open for about a month. The pour is a very pale apple juice brassy color, painfully clear. The nose is all in on the apples with strong notes of sweet apple juice, tart apple skins, green apples, red delicious apples, green pears, slight lemon, lemongrass, slight grain and almost no ethanol note. This is very, very complex and also very dainty and delicate. After a while there's just the slightest hint of ash and an ephemeral note of something resembling mercurochrome. I'm loving this complexity while the whisky never becomes overpowering. Very impressive. On the palate this maintains its delicacy. There is a sweet blush of butter and honey up front that quickly dissolves into an assortment of orchard fruits, primarily Honeycrisp apple, green pears, green tea, and graham crackers. As the flavor begins to fade there's a nice transition to ginger, allspice and finally cracked pepper. The finish is moderate, fading cleanly to a lemony tartness with a bit of the bitter lemon pith left on the back of the tongue. I don't have a lot of experience with Japanese whisky. I've had Toki (not a fan), Nikka Grain (quite nice if ultimately a bit too reticent to hold my attention), Nikka From the Barrel (yes, please), Yamazaki 12 (I remember liking it but I don't remember specifics about it) and this. If this is typifies an excellent Japanese whisky, then I've done myself a disservice by not paying more attention to the category. Taken on its own this is a top tier distillate, full stop. I use a simple grading system based on bell curve distribution. Mass market quality product (Beam, JD, Woodford, Dewar's) will hover between 2 and 3. Truly good product emerges at 3.5 and above 4 are the stand-out products that offer unique tasting adventure balanced with a reachable price point. This is such a whisky. This is absolutely above average. Well above average, in fact.
-
Tasted neat at room temperature side-by-side with Kirkland French Vodka. I'm not a vodka fan, certainly not a vodka snob. This started because my wife and I really like a Cajun Martini (https://www.liquor.com/cajun-martini-cocktail-recipe-5218591) pool-side and I needed to buy vodka. Naturally I wanted to know which is the best to get and that's how I started tasting mid-shelf vodkas. ,On ithe nose there is a very slight sugary cake-frosting note to the Wheatley that I don't get from the Kirkland. They are very, very close and that's why I do these sbs - no way to parse out differences so slight over time based on memory alone. Both smell "like vodka" with the Kirkland giving a slightly more ethanol-centric note. On the palate the Wheatley is definitely sweeter, but also a bit thinner in mouthfeel. The Kirkland is richer, a bit more peppery and has a slight bitterness in a fast finish. The Wheatley is altogether a more approachable, sweeter take while still retaining a significantly neutral personality. This is like comparing "Snowbound" white paint with "Atrium" white paint. Yes they are different but at the end of the day they are white paint. Both are clean and neutral and perhaps sweeter and less hot than Sobieski, thinner and not quite as earthy as Luksusowa, and no where near as transparent in flavor as Smirnoff 100 proof. This bottle set me back about $28 for a handle. The Kirkland is $20. The Sobieski is $17. I have to be honest, I did like the Wheatley best in the Cajun Martini, though. Something about that sweetness. Or was that just the particular pepper I used? Recommended if the additional costs doesn't matter to you. If it does, opt for the Sobieski or Kirkland.
-
Thompson Saison cask single cask
Single Malt — New Zealand
Reviewed June 28, 2023 (edited July 6, 2023)Enjoying a sample courtesy of @PBMichiganWolverine. Tasted neat from a NEAT glass after a bit of rest. The nose has a bit of vanilla and caramelized sugar, but that's in the background. Up front this is dry grass, almond, and ghosts of young, green fruit like immature grapes. Interesting. On the palate I'm struck by the silky mouthfeel. There's more sweetness in the palate than the nose suggests. Caraway and dark chocolate notes emerge after an initial burst of sweet, dark raisins and a molasses-like note that's far more dry than that syrup, but has the dark elements of that taste profile. The finish is relatively quick and there's a bit of sweet and bitter that hang around for a few long seconds after the swallow. Very interesting whiskey. I'm reminded of Koval millet whiskey here, only with much less spice and greater richness. This is worth exploring if you find a bottle. -
Rothman & Winter Orchard Peach Liqueur
Fruit Liqueurs — Austria
Reviewed May 31, 2023 (edited July 6, 2023)I purchased this on a lark from a LLS that had it on close-out pricing at $10 for the bottle. I took a flier and this time that chance was a complete win! Both on the palate and on the nose all I can say is WOW! Peaches and more peaches. Sweet. Very, very rich. Very deep and full flavor. A truly excellent flavored brandy. This is excellent neat and is quite enjoyable after a meal on a big piece of ice. The killer app is to add about 1/2 ounce to an Old Fashioned made with a cask strength bourbon in place of the simple syrup. Holy smoke! I'm very glad I took a chance on this and I'll have no problems ponying up the $30 per bottle for the apricot and maybe one or two others. Recommended if you need a really well made flavor modifier for your cocktail needs. -
I'm not going to become obsessed with vodka, but my recent consumption of Cajun martinis has me leaning in that direction at this moment in time. While at Costco, I just couldn't resist taking a shot at this expression, reported to be the equivalent of Grey Goose at half the price. I wouldn't know, I don't drink a lot of vodka so I will compare this to the Sobieski, Luksusowa and Smirnoff Blue I've recently reviewed on this site. Tasted in the aforementioned Cajun Martini, 4:1 Vodka Martini, Reverse Martini and neat. On the nose this is slightly sweet, otherwise very neutral. On the palate this retains the sweetness of the nose and adds a rich 'bready' note that reminds me of the center portion of grocery store white bread. It's subtle but adds a "comfort food" vibe to the experience. Of particular note is mouthfeel, which is silky and rich. Nicely creamy with very little pepper or heat, this is a clean and delivers a fast, muted finish. Overall I like this the most of the four vodkas I've examined recently. This is the best balanced by far, and the most interesting on its own. It is at least equal to the Sobieski in the jalapeno concoction where the rye vodka's spicy DNA works with the vegetal elements of the pepper. The Kirkland is better in the other applications where I've tried it. Good price, good value, definitely recommended as a quality house vodka. At $21 for a 1.75 liter bottle, this is an easy buy. One thing I'll add to this - the bottle is stupidly large and heavy. It's tall enough to potentially present some storage issues, as if finding a spot for the Luxardo Maraschino wasn't annoying enough. I score on a simple scale that follows a bell curve. A 1 on this scale is well below average, most mass market offerings will cluster around 2.5. Kirkland French Vodka is a bit ahead of the curve.
-
Bombay Sapphire Premier Cru Murcian Lemon
London Dry Gin — England
Reviewed May 10, 2023 (edited March 20, 2024)We enjoy Bombay Sapphire gin in many cocktails. My wife and I are both fans of it in a martini, although we can to lean towards different vermouths. It's also outstanding in a White Lady, a Bee's Knees, or any other cocktail that can benefit from a gin that's slightly softer than a full London Dry. There was zero hesitation when we saw this premium expression of our house gin hit the market. On the nose the lemon is forward and orange takes a back seat. Lemon elements really make the orange a bit obscured. In comparison to the regular Bombay Sapphire, the fruitiness is significantly more present. The standard bombay sapphire expresses more spices. On the palate the Bombay Sapphire standard expression is soft, slightly leaning towards juniper with notes of licorice, cardamom, and soft floral elements. In contrast, the Premier Cru takes all of that and turbocharges it with a citrus party. The lemon is there in spades and the orange makes a solid appearance on the taste buds. There's no mistaking the citrus fruit DNA of this distillate. This is an excellent gin, particularly with Fever Tree elderflower tonic water. That's a great combination!. This is also very good with soda and a blood orange wedge as a garnish. Perhaps not surprisingly this also makes a very worthy Martini and loves a lemon twist garnish. It's fruity, but it does hold up well in partners with Dolin dry vermouth, a couple drops of orange bitters, and a drop of saline. I have to look at value on this particular expression. The Premier Cru carries a rather steep price penalty over the standard expression. I believe this bottle set me back something north of $30 and that's too much. It's very good but must be weighed within the context of its value proposition. Overall, I like it and I would recommend it if you already enjoy sapphire or would just like to take a shot at something new. It probably won't be replaced on my bar as there are other expressions I like a bit better that hit the wallet a bit softer. BSPC is positioned against Tanqueray 10 - they are similar in price and both claim a crafted, citrus bias. I think the BSPC is taking a shot at the special releases from Hendricks. I've had almost all the Hendrick's available domestically, and I've enjoyed 10. I would likely take Orbium, Neptunia, Lunar or Flora Adora over this, and maybe the T10 too but its been too long for me to say that with certainty. I'm a full-throated fan of the Hendrick's special releases, To me they tend to take gin to a new flavor destination as a temporary "experiment" in flavors. That's fun. I'm a bit more reticent to crow about this one. It is very good, but unlike something like Neptunia or Flora Adora it's really a relatively safe and moderate expression and I believe a permanent line extension. It doesn't break new ground, but does give a very high polish to spaces that may have already been explored within the gin world. I'm glad I bought it and I'm glad to know I can get it again but I'm not in a hurry to do so. Recommended if you haven't tried it, if you like Sapphire and if you like citrus forward gin.35.49 USD per Cocktail -
I'm not generally a vodka guy. It's not that I don't like vodka, but more along the lines of I don't (or didn't) find it interesting. That is until I recently made a Cajun Martini. My wife and I have likely consumed more vodka in the last 30 days (since first batching this cocktail) than we've drunk in the 12 months before that all together! There's no surprise that inspired me to take a closer look at vodka. First let's define a Cajun Martini. Here's the whole story - https://www.liquor.com/cajun-martini-cocktail-recipe-5218591 The short version to make a 750ml batched cocktail - put 450ml of vodka in a jar with a big, ripe, fresh jalapeno pepper that has been washed and cleanly split in half from stem to end with just one cut. Let the pepper infuse into the vodka for 6 to 8 hours or so. Strain the pepper out and bottle the infused vodka. Add 175ml of Martini & Rossi dry vermouth (this expression has a bit of an oregano note that some folks don't love in a Martini, but it works perfectly in this recipe, imho). Add 100 to 125 ml of distilled water to the batched drink and keep it in the freezer. Serve up in a chilled glass with a spicy pickle as the garnish. So far we've batched this drink with Smirnoff Blue, Sobieski and Luksusowa. To get a better idea of the nature of each vodka we also sampled them neat and neat/freezer-chilled. Here are our thoughts about the Sobieski. This is a Polish vodka made from rye. It was recommended to me by a vodka martini drinking friend who liked it more than Tito's. Trying those two side-by-side left me agreeing that, while the Tito's had a bit of lemony citrus, the Sobieski had better "roundness". On the nose this vodka had a very slightly citrusy note. While the Sobieski didn't have the forward ethanol note of Smirnoff Blue, it was hot. My wife called it "very sharp". As with the other vodkas evaluated, the icy cold freezer pour offered up no aroma beyond slight alcohol. On the tongue this vodka doubled down on being sharp with a bit of a bite. The citrus was in play, though it was behind the peppery aggressive nature of the vodka's rye ancestry. Mouthfeel was rich, but not quite to the level of the Luksusowa. The freezer chilled sample was very thick and rich with a silky finish that left a slightly bitter finish. Sobieski is the yin to Luksusowa's yang, but the differences are slight. My wife chose the Smirnoff as her favorite of the three with the Luksusowa in second place when tasted neat. I chose the opposite and had the Luksusowa as my first choice and the Smirnoff was my second place. We both agreed, however, that the Sobieski offered the best Cajun Martini. Now the problem here is that we have a pretty small statistical sample, having made precisely three batches with Sobieski and one each with Smirnoff and Luksusowa. The difference could well have been the differences in the pepper, which seriously swamps the differences in vodkas. But we both agreed that the Sobieski tended towards a sweeter, "greener" and more vegetal take on the batched cocktail, but we've enjoyed each batch with enthusiasm (and chips with salsa). I like and recommend Sobieski vodka. It's very mixable, good in a Vesper, excellent in a Cajun Martini and at least acceptable in every other vodka application I can think of. I'm not going to become a vodka fanatic and I doubt I'll ever have more than a handle or two hanging about for cocktails. That said, I have a renewed reason to at least pay a bit more attention to those bottles; we'll be drinking a lot more vodka as the sweet, vegetal freshness and slight capsaicin heat of the Cajun Martini keeps us entertained poolside for the foreseeable future.13.99 USD per Bottle
-
I'm not generally a vodka guy. It's not that I don't like vodka, but more along the lines of I don't (or didn't) find it interesting. That is until I recently made a Cajun Martini. My wife and I have likely consumed more vodka in the last 30 days (since first batching this cocktail) than we've drunk in the 12 months before that all together! There's no surprise that inspired me to take a closer look at vodka. First let's define a Cajun Martini. Here's the whole story - https://www.liquor.com/cajun-martini-cocktail-recipe-5218591 The short version to make a 750ml batched cocktail - put 450ml of vodka in a jar with a big, ripe, fresh jalapeno pepper that has been washed and cleanly split in half from stem to end with just one cut. Let the pepper infuse into the vodka for 6 to 8 hours or so. Strain the pepper out and bottle the infused vodka. Add 175ml of Martini & Rossi dry vermouth (this expression has a bit of an oregano note that some folks don't love in a Martini, but it works perfectly in this recipe, imho). Add 100 to 125 ml of distilled water to the batched drink and keep it in the freezer. Serve up in a chilled glass with a spicy pickle as the garnish. So far I've batched this drink with Smirnoff Blue, Sobieski and Luksusowa. To get a better idea of the nature of each vodka I also sampled them neat and neat/freezer-chilled. Here are my thoughts about the Luksusowa On the nose this vodka had a slightly sweet, slightly loamy note. This is a potato vodka and maybe its the power of suggestion, but I got less of a refined chemical vibe from this than I did from the Smirnoff Blue that was also included in this side-by-side tasting. There was an alcohol note to the nose but it wasn't nearly as sharp as the Smirnoff, although I wouldn't call this fragrant by any stretch of the imagination. As with the other vodkas evaluated, the icy cold freezer pour offered up almost no aroma. On the tongue this vodka retained its earthy, slightly sweet character. The mouthfeel was more oily than either the Sobieski or the Smirnoff, particularly in the freezer chilled sample. It had a silky finish and left a slightly sweet note that quickly decayed to a soft bitter finish. I would still consider this neutral but in the same way that alabaster white is still neutral, but not nearly as neutrally sterile as arctic white. My wife chose the Smirnoff as her favorite of the three with the Luksusowa in second place when tasted neat. I chose the opposite and had the Luksusowa as my first choice and the Smirnoff was my second place. When it comes to the Cajun Martini there's a monkey wrench in the gears as we both liked the Sobieski best! More about that in the upcoming review of that brand. I can recommend this vodka and I think this might be the one I'd enjoy most in a "traditional" vodka martini (5:1, dash of orange bitters, garnished with a twist). It is very subtle, but there's a bit of personality there that can make it interesting. Plus its an inexpensive way to compare a potato vodka to a rye vodka, to a multi-grain vodka (and maybe more to come). I'm not going to become a vodka fanatic and I doubt I'll ever have more than a handle or two hanging about for cocktails. That said, I have a renewed reason to at least pay a bit more attention to those bottles; we'll be drinking a lot more vodka as the sweet, vegetal freshness and slight capsaicin heat of the Cajun Martini keeps us entertained poolside for the foreseeable future.16.99 USD per Bottle
-
I'm not a vodka guy. At all. It's not that I don't like vodka, but more along the lines of I don't (or didn't) find it interesting. That is until I made a Cajun Martini. I've consumed more vodka in the last 30 days since first batching this cocktail than I'd had in the 12 months before that combined. That inspired me to take a closer look at vodka. First let's define a Cajun Martini. Here's the whole story - https://www.liquor.com/cajun-martini-cocktail-recipe-5218591 The short version to make a 750ml batched cocktail - put 450ml of vodka in a jar with a big, ripe, fresh jalapeno pepper that has been washed and cleanly split in half from stem to end with just one cut. Let the pepper infuse into the vodka for 6 to 8 hours or so. Strain the pepper out and bottle the infused vodka. Add 175ml of Martini & Rossi dry vermouth (this expression has a bit of an oregano note that some folks don't love in a Martini, but it works perfectly in this recipe, imho). Add 100 to 125 ml of distilled water to the batched drink and keep it in the freezer. Serve up in a chilled glass with a spicy pickle as the garnish. So far I've batched this drink with Smirnoff Blue, Sobieski and Luksusowa. To get a better idea of the nature of each vodka I also sampled them neat and neat/freezer-chilled. Here are my thoughts about the Smirnoff On the nose this vodka delivered ethanol and not much else. There was a dominant alcohol note and maybe a very slight hint of black pepper and of lemon rind but those required some teasing to get to and disappeared in the freezer-chilled sample. On the tongue this vodka was a bit hot with notes of black pepper and slight citrus. I noted a rich mouthfeel and overall thought it was quite neutral compared to the other vodkas we tested in this side-by-side comparison. My wife chose the Smirnoff as her favorite of the three with the Luksusowa in second place when tasted neat. I chose the opposite and had the Luksusowa as my first choice and this was my second place. When it comes to the Cajun Martini there's a monkey wrench in the gears as we both liked the Sobieski best! More about that in the upcoming review of that expression. I recommend this vodka as a solid, somewhat boring and generally average sample of the liquor style. I'm particularly interested in using this for infusions as its higher ABV may be helpful in wringing out every bit of flavor in my experiments plus I think it might stand up a bit better in complex concoctions. At the end of the day none of this is leading to a love affair with vodka, but the sweet freshness and slight capsaicin heat of the Cajun Martini will keep me entertained poolside for the foreseeable future.19.99 USD per Bottle
-
It's been said a bit of fragrance clings to the hand that gives flowers. I like gin, and I like big, bold flavors. I like the unusual and this is the crest of that hill. Rarely am I taken so far from my expectations as this drink has taken me. I like the Hendricks special releases and they all have been quite enjoyable, but this is simply an exercise in "so you think that's all of it". This is what happens when you try to get all Spinal Tap with a fragrant elixir. This is so goddam flowery that you'll think you're drinking a cocktail made from potpourri. Fragrant and perfumy doesn't even begin to describe the zip code where this exists. This is gin turned up to 11 on the botanical and flower scale. I've tried this gin neat, on ice, with varieties of tonic and in a martini. This is unlike any gin I've have before. It's not easy to like, but it is easy to love. It is the single most floral gin I've ever tasted. It's complex, rich, layered and requires patient contemplation to reveal its reason for appreciation. My wife isn't a fan, but I like it! Juniper and coriander are there for sure, but they are in the background. Rose, chrysanthemum, dendrobium, and pansy take the foreground. This is a full on flower garden in bloom, and it works. Neat or on ice this is a delicious sipper. In a martini with a properly delicate vermouth like Dolin or Noilly Pratt this is an explosion of springtime on the taste buds. With soda and garnished with a wedge of ruby grapefruit this is a perfect Sunday brunch cocktail. I had this with Fever Tree Elderflower tonic - way too much of a good thing. Don't go there. With Indian tonic and a blood orange slice this redeemed itself as a tall drink. This is a polarizing gin. You'll love it or you'll hate it. You won't be neutral, and that's okay. This is a big flavor and very far from the usual. Clearly Ms Lesley Gracie has decided to leave the pasture of safe and expected and taken this to a new level. This is an 11 on the 1 to 10 scale of the tasteometer - it's louder and, therefore, better. You're probably not having 2 in a row, but I'm guessing if you like intense you'd like to have one every now and then. I know I do. What I'm thinking next is 'can this gin go where only a few liqueurs go?' This is as herbaceous as a St Germain, Benedictine or Chartreuse liqueur but without the sweetness. This gin needs to be in a cocktail designed to take advantage of its fragrant nature. I'll be working on it, and if you get any ideas please share! I think this is worth every penny of the $38 price tag even though I doubt I'll be getting a back-up bottle. It's a special release and it should be enjoyed the way flowers are enjoyed. In the words of W Somerset Maugham, "Nothing in the world is permanent, and we’re foolish when we ask anything to last, but surely we’re still more foolish not to take delight in it while we have it." Enjoy this while we have it.38.99 USD per Bottle
Results 31-40 of 277 Reviews