Tastes
-
Shieldaig The Classic Blended Scotch Whisky
Blended — Scotland
Reviewed June 23, 2021 (edited November 19, 2023)I'm having some fun with a handful of 50ml samplers I purchased at Total Wine. This sample is tasted near from a glencairn. Ample time was allowed for the whisky to rest after the pour before tasting. The nose on this is ethanol and what I perceive as "cheap whisky smell". Its kind of a musty, grainy, stale smell that's not very appealing. After a series of vigorous swirls, If I really dig into it, I get green apple, slight sultanas and a wisp of non-distinct floral notes. On the palate this is only slightly better than the nose. The entry is sweet (surprisingly so) and somewhat thin. It quickly fades right as you're beginning to think "well, this isn't so bad - in fact its kinda surprising - oh, wait..." From that point on it starts falling apart. The mid palate turns quickly bitter, then sour. There's maybe a blush of something like smoke over the top of this sweet chewing gum note and right after the bitter-thing-that-could-be-wood hits the taste buds. The finish is watery with slight black pepper and a sour tale that reminds me slightly of Buffalo Trace (there's a lemon sourness to the finish in BT that makes it work really well in a whiskey sour but makes it quite unpalatable for me as a neat sipper, though admittedly not this bad). Anyway, at no point does this really get any better than the first sip. I rate on a simple scale where a 1 = drain pour and 5 = a perfect example of the expression. Most competently produced whisky (or whiskey) should land right about 2.5 with a majority favoring the bell curve between 2.0 and 3.0. This blended scotch belongs at the bottom of that range. This doesn't hold a candle to JW Black, Monkey Shoulder, or even Dewar's White Label, which I drink quite often when I'm travelling or otherwise in a situation where a better dram isn't an option. I might put this on the same plane as a Famous Grouse, or maybe even a step lower. I'm not a fan and I don't recommend this whisky, although it certainly could be worse. If I'm lucky I won't have to taste any that are less appealing, but I know that's an inevitable outcome for a cocktail warrior hell-bent on trying just about everything. Cheers and good luck! -
Grangestone 12 Year
Single Malt — Highlands, Scotland
Reviewed June 22, 2021 (edited November 16, 2021)I'm having a little bit of fun with 50ml samplers that I purchased from Total Wine. I am completely unfamiliar with Grangestone and I have never had any of this brand of whisky before. I sampled this neat from a Glencairn and gave the whiskey ample opportunity to rest before tasting. The nose is pretty nondescript. I get a little honey, some ethanol, a bit of a light grain note, perhaps a bit flowery. Certainly nothing special about it. There is also nothing off-putting. It has a surprisingly good mouth feel, with a soft entry and a wave of sweetness. The finish goes a bit bitter after the swallow. A bit of wood is what's left as an aftertaste. There's really not much to it and there's nothing to get excited about. 2.5 stars for being wholly average and, I'm assuming, pretty inexpensive. -
I'm back for a serious look at this rye. I was gobsmacked by my first taste at a casual restaurant and I knew immediately that JDSBR was a near future purchase. This bottle has been open for about 4 days and I've had maybe 4 oz from the bottle, so this is as good a look at a bottle as I can manage. I tasted this neat from a shot glass. I also enjoyed a similar taste of my current favorite in the rye category, Wild Turkey Rare Breed Rye. Looking at them side by side in the glasses they are indistinguishable. Both are old copper penny colored. I've had enough of both to know they have a similar viscosity. On the nose the JDSBR is fruitcake covered in warm caramel. It's just beautifully sweet and fruity. By comparison the rich nose of the WTRBR is more akin to warm cinnamon banana bread with more of a baking spice note. They are nearly equally rich, one leaning towards the yin and the other the yang of the smell spectrum. I mean seriously, I could go on but would you want me to? On the palate the JDSBR is Christmas candy and sweet bran muffins with butter. I get a bit of clove, ginger, dark rye bread, cream cheese frosting. It's just a dessert in a shot glass with a great, oily mouthfeel. This is a very good, reasonably complex rye whiskey with absolutely no sharp edges. This is too easy to drink. In comparison the WTRBR is all about cinnamon red hots and Jamaican jerk spice. There's rye bread, darker pumpernickel notes, a bit of smoky char, barrel oak, black pepper, plums, apricots and maybe a bit of banana and cherry. This is rich and demands a bit of attention be paid. No Willy Loman in a bottle, this rye wants you to pay attention "right now". On the finish the JDSBR is modest with a touch of heat and a nice slow, sweet fade to a fruity exhale. The balance here is just perfect - this is a light, fruity, complex rye and the finish is moderately long with a variable flavor profile that never strays from a pleasing sweetness coupled with a touch of heat. The WTRBR is a brute. It leaves with stone fruit sweetness in an envelope of chile pepper fire. Complex, brash, maybe even loud and unapologetic - I'll restate my previous admonishment that this might not be a good choice for a beginner. Bring your grown-up palate to this party. Pick your mood. If you find yourself feeling lyrical, euphoric and in need of a whiskey version of Don Giovanni then I'd say it's Jack Daniels all the way. If you're feeling a bit more "Ride Of The Valkyries" then maybe you should consider the bird for the win. Either way, you can't lose! I'm increasing my previous rating on this, it's a solid 4.49.99 USD per Bottle
-
Tasted neat from a small snifter. The pour is a deep clear mahogany and really shows the sherry cask tint. My nose immediately says "sweet". This smells like the hot caramel Dairy Queen puts on a sundae. There are notes of spun sugar & corn syrup hard candy. There is the slightest hint of latex paint, but no edgy methanol. There's not a lot of fruit from the sherry on the nose. It's a very pleasant, if not terribly complex profile. This has a creamy mouthfeel and my first impression is that this is quite a silky, easy sipper. It's not nearly so sweet as the aroma suggests. There's a flash of egg white, dark chocolate, yellow cake and a suggestion of maple with orchard fruit. The flavor profile doesn't escape the slightly chemical note noticed on the nose with a slight layer of ethanol giving this an unwelcome roughness. It's by no means aggressive, but the fault is one of commission that keeps this rum from being a contender. I like this, but not enough to spring $45 for it again. I just don't think its a great value, although it is a reasonably good rum My rating scale holds a 1 = drain pour & 5 = a near perfect example of the expression. Most competently manufactured liquors should be found on a bell curve with the average being 2.5. This is a little above average and is borderline 3.0 to 3.25, imho.44.99 USD per Bottle
-
Knob Creek Cask Strength Straight Rye (2018 Release)
Rye — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed May 21, 2021 (edited May 28, 2021)Barreled in 2009, 119.6 proof. Tasted neat from a shot glass with a Kulture Ting's ( Green Bench Brewing) Pilsner handling the supporting role. Hey, we all have our weaknesses... "Wow, this is big" were my first thoughts when my wife brought this out for me. She'll do this to me from time to time; just grab a shot from a bottle in the cabinet and bring it out to me and ask me to guess what the hell I'm drinking. She's absolutely a keeper... This is a candy bar on the nose. Sweet with not as much fruit as I expected from a rye. This is all nougat and caramel and milk chocolate. There's a hint of cherries. The nose is absolutely spectacular. On the palate this is definitely serious business. It's 120 proof and drinks like it is. Cinnamon red hots, ginger, allspice, apples, maple, it's all there. This is a barely legal rye? That's just a guess, I haven't looked up the mash bill. It tastes more bourbon than rye to me. Regardless this is a powerhouse. Super tasty if just a bit over the top. Recommended for the adventurous at heart.70.0 USD per Bottle -
Labeled as Mt Gay XO Triple Barrel Blend, I'm assuming this is the correct listing. This is from a 3 rum sampler from Flaviar. Tasted neat from a glencairn. The pour is a brassy walnut and shows significant sheeting and slow tears on a swirl. I'm thinking this might have a rich and creamy mouthfeel. The nose is very tempting with rich butterscotch, maple sugar, creme brulee, brioche, and a bit of baking spice. It's quite complex and devoid of unruly ethanol or acetone notes. Quite a nice nose all around! I'm looking forward to a sip! The taste profile of this rum is in line with it's aromas. It has the rich mouthfeel promised in the swirl. There's a bit of over ripe banana, some bitter banana skin, turbinado sugar, ripe dates, caramel, slight cafe au lait, vanilla and maple. The finish is short and marked with a bit of allspice, dark chocolate and a sweet egg bread like massa sovada. I like this rum. It's a nice sipper. It could definitely benefit from a higher proof. According to the interwebs, this was discontinued in mid 2020 but it's possible this is a new expression? In looking around I see this listed at about $65 locally. It's not better than Foursquare Sagacity (not close) and that bottle is only about $10 more (and now very hard to find), so I'm not going to stand in line to buy this. Value is a judgement, taste is taste - and this is a tasty rum in my judgement. Maybe its not the best value, but that's never stopped anyone from raving about Blanton's bourbon so there's that. This is better than average.62.99 USD per Bottle
-
Mount Gay Black Barrel Rum (Discontinued)
Dark Rum — Barbados
Reviewed May 18, 2021 (edited July 4, 2021)Tasted neat from a glencairn, this is one of three rums offered as a tasting kit from Flaviar. The pour is a brassy gold and shows consistent sheeting on a swirl with slow legs. I'm expecting a richer mouthfeel. I gave the pour a solid 10 minutes rest before tasting. The nose of this rum is sweet with vanilla, caramel and butterscotch notes. There's also an ethanol note. Pretty much four notes and not much depth/complexity to the aromas coming off the glass. There's maybe a touch of wet wood barrel. Nothing about the smell of this rum is inspiring me. On the palate, this is a bit better than the nose intimated. There's a silky mouthfeel, sweet cream initial impact and a short white pepper finish. Some might call this "smooth" but I've learned this is often a way of saying "I'm so happy that this drink doesn't challenge me and has no spice" - which is a pretty reasonable translation in this case. There's a touch of lemon sour about mid curve, then a stronger hint of chemical alcohol. There's also a prominent "paper" note, like cardboard. A slight aftertaste of banana skins and a bit of a floral character hang on for a few seconds. Finally, there's a ghostly hint of maple syrup after the finish. I had to really dig to find flavors. I can't help but feel there might have been a good rum buried somewhere under a young, very pedestrian filler and that's where it fails. Nope, this isn't doing it for me. I looked up the price and for $39.99 for a 750ml in my local market I'm going to say this is a hard pass. It's not horrible, but I don't want to drink any more of it and I certainly wouldn't pay that kind of money to mix it, either. It's not a good value and its not ultimately a very good rum, imho I'd rather have Mt Gay Eclipse at half the price.39.99 USD per Bottle -
Part of a Mt Gay rum tasting trio from Flaviar. I'm somewhat new to critical rum reviews. I've had many, many "sipping rums" on my travels through Florida, Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. The 2021 New Year marked a more serious appreciation for this spirit and my love for Foursquare is pretty intense. Let's see what this iconic brand brings to the party. The pour is a light brass. A swirl shows multiple thin legs and light sheeting that dissipates quickly. I anticipate this will be just a touch thin. I gave it a good 5 minutes to rest and tasted neat from a glencairn. The nose is slight cotton candy, cut grass, gently butterscotch. The nose is thankfully free of any ethanol or chemical notes. It's very soft, but clean and appealing. On the palate this rum continues its lightweight journey. Surprisingly this is reminding me of Japanese whisky, particularly Suntory's Toki. Very light and delicate. It is not at all complex. There's a slight sweetness, a touch of honey, a bit of caramel, very light white pepper and a short, clean finish. There's a blush of ginger. and a light sweetness remains on the palate after a swallow. This is the antithesis of demanding. The finish is short, clean and combines sweet with a touch of sour lemondrop. Interesting, I get no banana or fruit. I get more banana from a Belgian ale than is present in this by an order of magnitude. This is okay as a sipper, but not good enough to be enthusiastic. It might be a reasonable mixer, but its ephemeral taste profile means it will get lost quickly in multi-element cocktails. I'm thinking this is a good choice for a highball with Q soda and an orange zest twist. It might also be interesting to mix this into something Manhattan-like with an Ambrato vermouth That's probably my next experiment. This is a $20 bottle. It's certainly a good value with no fatal flaws for its inexpensive market position. It's really not my thing, but I'm not hating on it. I'll happily trade a 90% full 750ml bottle of Toki for a 50% full bottle of this! I rate on a scale where 1 is undrinkable for me and 5 is a perfect example of the expression. Looking at a bell curve, most competently made liquors should sit between 2 and 3 with the peak at 2.5. I think this is an honest 2.75 and that's not a bad thing at this price point.19.99 USD per Bottle
-
Del Maguey Chichicapa Mezcal
Mezcal Joven — Oaxaca, Mexico
Reviewed April 23, 2021 (edited March 6, 2022)Tasted neat from a glencairn. The pour was allowed to rest for a while after the pour. This is from a fresh bottle as I begin to explore mezcals. This is a liquor with which I've had little experience and I don't understand why I waited. The combination of vegetal and phenol elements hooked me. I sense this could get expensive... This is the fourth mezcal I've tried and is easily the best so far. The aromas from the glass are complex and delightful. I get fresh grapefruit, mint, cactus, cut grass, plastic (think cheap rain poncho), ethanol and oil smoke. It's both an assault on the senses and an Alice-in-Wonderland experience and I'm enjoying the ride. Mouthfeel is rich and creamy. The palate is lush with sweet syrup, smoky ash, agave, lemons, ruby grapefruit, green bell pepper, black pepper and a touch of capsacin. The finish has a lovely fade, leaving a sweet film on the lips and a gentle warming in the throat. I find this to be an easy drinking expression of what has to be one of the more polarizing liquors. I can easily see how mezcal can be a love it or hate it thing. I can't get away from the echoes of Islay. I like the category and I really like this expression. It's bracing, refreshing, relaxed and challenging all at once. My ratings 1 = simply horrible and 5 = a perfect expression with the bell curve predicting most average liquors will land between 2 and 3. 4 stars and above represent the very best of what I've had and easily land on my "buy again" list. This Del Maguey Chichicapa expression belongs near the top.79.99 USD per Bottle
Results 111-120 of 277 Reviews