Tastes
-
Quarter Horse Kentucky Bourbon
Bourbon — Kentucky, USA
Reviewed April 9, 2021 (edited October 13, 2021)Quarter Horse is made using a technology called TerrePure which the distillers claim can recreate years of aging in a matter of hours using ultrasonic waves. No I am not making it up. That's how the technology is described. This Bourbon has been aged for a year and, as far as I can tell, then put on the TerrePure machine to give it additional flavor. Sounds like a cool technology and interesting gimmick but in practice, if the Quarter Horse is anything to go by, this will hardly be the future of bourbon making. Right off the bat it has one of the least inviting smells from a bourbon I have ever experienced. It smells of corn, rye, hay, sandalwood chips and a strange burst of ethanol. The sandalwood chip smell isn't pleasant though. More like a dusty accident than an intended odor. As for the ethanol, it reminds me of the various alcohols I got to experiment with in Organic Chemistry. Not quite the ethanol humans consume. Taste wise this is just really bizarre. It tastes like some other liquid that isn't bourbon doing it's best impression and falling quite short. Best comparison I have is how Stevia kind of replaces the taste of sugar. You can still tell it's not "real" sugar though. Or as if you left a glass of bourbon out on a hot day then came back to it and it tastes flat and lost most of its flavor. This isn't pleasant. There is some flavor of apple tart along with the sweet corn flavor of bourbon so it isn't all completely bad but these positives don't last for very long. They're extremely ephemeral quickly giving way to one of the worst finished I have ever experienced in my life. Medicinal, perversely bitter, acrid coupled unpleasantly with that fake ethanol taste I caught on the nose which overwhelms the finish quite unceremoniously--it tastes synthetic in the worst sense of the word. Worst of all the finish stays around for much, much longer than the actual flavor. I timed it and it stuck with me for 2 minutes. That's a real shame because I really wanted to like this product. I'm open to new technologies when it comes to production methods and it's a cool bottle. I'm not going to lie, I'm half tempted to buy the bottle both because it looks cool and it makes for an interesting conversation piece and point of comparison. But as something to drink, this is borderline undrinkable. I'm not even sure it can be used as a mixer, though maybe with some Coke the worst of the finish can be dealt with. I could finish my glass so it's not getting a rating below 1 which I reserve for stuff I can't finish and outright makes me want to gag. But this is pretty damn close. -
An amazing introductory bourbon. Nose is on point with it's ingredients. My initial guess was 60% corn, 40% rye which is pretty close to the actual ingredients. Look deeper and you see the traditional notes of vanilla and caramel. On the tongue not much changes. Sweet corn, a bit of a kick from rye, sweet vanilla and caramel linger in the background. The finish is light and has a surprisingly cherry finish. Sweet without overdoing it and a perfect mixer or guilt free daily sipper.
-
This is NOT a complicated bottle. Aroma is of corn, ethanol and the expected sweetness of bourbon. You can tell this is mostly made from corn and is over 40%. Taste wise you get what you smell. There is no complexity or surprises here. It tastes of generic bourbon with an overwhelming taste of corn, caramel (maybe more rightly stated caramel corn), overly sweet vanilla and molasses. You can catch a whiff of the oak at the end reminding you that this has been aged for four years. This is very, very sweet stuff. But unlike Jack Daniel's it just feels sugary rather than the weird artificial additives and odd sour note that reminds you that define Jack. Sure this is more generic and sickly sweet but at 43% it goes down so smoothly and the sweetness does wonders mixed. Recommend you drink it on the rocks to deal with the sugar but for the price this is my go to ultra-budget bottle.
-
Hands down the best ultra-budget Tequila on the market. This is super basic. Smells of agave with a whiff of ethanol though not bad for the bottom shelf. Taste is the same. Agave. That's it. Lasts for a few seconds then it's gone. Basic but drinkable. Medium-light ethanol burn. I don't mind it but I do drink a lot. Added an extra .75 points because this stuff is dirt cheap. Excellent value. Use this for your party bowls.
-
I really wanted to like this drink but unfortunately I found it has a few major problems. You can't drink it straight, it's far too sweet for that and cloys easily. Chilling it does little to make it easy to sip. Only by drowning your glass with ice does this approach a good level of sweetness but it's so much ice required to make this mix work. Even then you're left with two problems. The first is that New Amsterdam vodka has a peculiar bitter after taste that just melds together with the bitterness of the pink lemonade making it a weirdly bitter affair despite the persistent sweetness. The second is that both ingredients, the vodka and pink lemonade taste cheap. It doesn't taste too artificial and I can see the appeal but it just wasn't the refreshing drink I was hoping for. Shame.
-
Maker's Mark smells quite pleasant but you wouldn't know it immediately upon opening the bottle. Without letting the Bourbon open up it just smells of oak and paint thinner. Let it linger in your glass though and the sweet smells begin coyly venture out. Vanilla, custard and baked pastries with chocolate mark the smell. There's also hints of corn and oak at the back. Nothing unusual for a Bourbon but they are quite pleasantly balanced. The palate is much less sweet but still appealing. Vanilla, brown sugar, oak and caramel dominate the experience. Further in the back you get toffee and baked bread. Towards the back mid palate you get a pleasant burst of corn. The finish is pretty light but lingers for a surprising amount of time. I'd say it's like having some vanilla with a nice, yeasty, sweet bread. Not bad if not at all complex. Ultimately Maker's Mark is a standard but well rounded Bourbon. There are no surprises here but by the same token it's hard to find any concrete fault with it. It's a worthy addition to any bar and a great daily sipper with lots of sweetness and breadiness to please just about anyone.
-
Martell VS Single Distillery
Cognac — Cognac, France
Reviewed April 3, 2021 (edited October 29, 2023)Absolutely lovely smell of red berries, maraschino cherries and grapes. Can't sense much else but honestly it has such a fine aroma I'm not mad. Pleasantly sweet on the tongue without cloying, the taste almost reminds me of chocolate covered cherries followed by the berries from the smell.The expert Review identified the berry as raspberry but I'm not entirely sold I'd narrow it down to that. Towards the mid palate you can taste some nice French Vanilla taste. The finish is magnificent with a nice oak and spicy finish that lingers without being unpleasant. Great price point too! -
On the fence about this offering. At first I didn't like it much at all with the tequila seemingly overwhelming all else. But as I sipped on not only did it began to grow on me but I began to appreciate the formidable 13% ABV. This gives you an instant buzz as any respectable LIT should. Unpacking the flavors the tequila, cola & citrus flavors are most prominent with the gin showing up at the finish. The spirits used are of the Cutwater brand so very decent if not outright spectacular and as far as an RTD goes this is actually pretty decent and actually even tastes better than some LITs I've had at less reputable dive bars. After finishing the can I realized what my gripe was. The cola was just on the flat side and a bit artificial. Given it's prominent role in the mix that's a bit of a shame, especially since more carbonation could have gone a long way. Nonetheless if you're looking for a quick way to get buzzed this is a great option and a cut above Monaco RTD's which are my go-to for instant buzz. Don't let my lukewarm review stop you from giving this a go. It gets the job done and definitely tastes as it should.
-
This is an extremely weird alcohol. It definitely tastes better than Bacardi Superior which is an exceedingly simple offering. On the nose it smells of caramel, vanilla, and fruit. It also has a more interesting taste with nice woody undertones, a stronger molasses profile than it's white brethren and sugar and caramel rounding out the experience. It definitely packs more of a boozy punch than the Superior but that's not necessarily a good thing. The time in the barrels definitely gives it more character but it hasn't been in the barrels long enough for the flavors to really develop and set in. In a cocktail I imagine that the faint flavors melt away by the other ingredients which functionally wouldn't make it too different from it's White counterpart. There are other offerings, including Bacardi 8, that are able to provide a more robust sipping experience. Which leaves me wondering what role is this supposed to play? If I want something more sophisticated to sip on, why not shelve out $5-7 more dollars for another offering or $10 for the 8 year which has a profoundly more refined experience to savor? Hell, if I want something more boozy why not just add a touch more of Bacardi Superior? I don't want to say this is a bad product because it isn't. It's very drinkable and offers some welcome complexity lacking in Bacardi Superior. It just sits at a weird angle where it's not the best mixer, sipper or shot. I enjoyed drinking it but it isn't a product I'm compelled to have.
-
Vodka is already hard enough to review as it's meant to be a neutral, blank slate spirit. Smirnoff is even harder to review because not only is it so ubiquitous, but it leads the pack of cheap vodkas. Do you review it compared to its other cheap brethren or, given it's pervasiveness, against the backdrop of all vodkas? That's no easy question to answer let alone when you consider that Smirnoff is truly one of the most characterless vodkas on the market. Given vodka's lack of flavor texture sticks out. Smirnoff quite literally doesn't have any texture. You could almost be forgiven for mistaking it for water. There is a hint of sweetness towards the end betraying that it is made from corn. I actually didn't know what it was made from until I tasted it and the faintest trace of corn caught my attention. But really, this is remarkably neutral especially for the price point. I will note there is some bitterness at the end as well with a medium lingering burn, the only indicators this is alcohol and not just sweetened water. All in all Smirnoff isn't a bad vodka. It just can't really differentiate itself or bring anything to the table. That may not be a bad thing at all. After all, vodka is *meant* to be neutral. Put this thing in the freezer and you can take shots to your heart's content. At this point whether you spend more money just depends on how much you want to lessen the burn when it goes down.
Results 71-80 of 102 Reviews